Theory and Decision

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 249–262

A Process Approach to the Utility for Gambling


DOI: 10.1023/A:1010325930290

Cite this article as:
Le Menestrel, M. Theory and Decision (2001) 50: 249. doi:10.1023/A:1010325930290


This paper argues that any specific utility or disutility for gambling must be excluded from expected utility because such a theory is consequential while a pleasure or displeasure for gambling is a matter of process, not of consequences. A (dis)utility for gambling is modeled as a process utility which monotonically combines with expected utility restricted to consequences. This allows for a process (dis)utility for gambling to be revealed. As an illustration, the model shows how empirical observations in the Allais paradox can reveal a process disutility of gambling. A more general model of rational behavior combining processes and consequences is then proposed and discussed.

Gambling Expected utility Process utility Rationality Consequentialism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departament d'Economia i Empresa, Ramon Trias VargasMarc le Menestrel, Universitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations