Abstract
Our objective was to test the hypothesis that the pheromone blend and/or diel periodicity of pheromonal communication differ in populations of the nun moth, Lymantria monacha(Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), from eastern Asia (northern Honshu, Japan) and Central Europe (Bohemia, Czech Republic). Coupled gas chromatographic–electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD) analyses of pheromone gland extract of female L. monachafrom Japan confirmed the presence of compounds previously identified in pheromone extracts of L. monachafrom Bohemia, as follows: (Z)-7-octadecene, 2-methyl-(Z)-7-octadecene (2me-Z7–18Hy), cis-7,8-epoxy-octadecane (monachalure), and cis-7,8-epoxy-2-methyloctadecane (disparlure). Field experiments in Honshu suggested that (+)-monachalure is the major pheromone component of L. monacha. 2me-Z7–18Hy significantly enhanced attractiveness of (+)-monachalure. Addition of (+)-disparlure to (+)-monachalure plus 2me-Z7–18Hy in Honshu and Bohemia increased attractiveness of lures by 1.2 and 20 times, respectively, indicating that (+)-disparlure is of least and most significance in the respective L. monachapopulations. Moreover, capture of male L. monachain pheromone-baited traps between 18:00 and 24:00 hr in Bohemia and 2:00 and 5:00 hr in Honshu revealed a markedly different diel periodicity of pheromonal communication. Pheromonal communication late at night and use of (+)-monachalure, rather than (+)-disparlure, as the major pheromone component by L. monachain Honshu may have resulted from interspecific competition with coseasonal L. fumida, which uses the early night for pheromonal communication and (+)-disparlure as major pheromone component. Whether communication channel divergence of L. monachain Honshu indeed constitutes a case of reproductive character displacement is difficult to prove. The evolution of such divergence in sympatricpopulations of L. fumidaand L. monachawould have to be demonstrated.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
ARN, H., STäDLER, E., and RAUSCHER, S. 1975. The electroantennographic detector-a selective and sensitive tool in the gas chromatographic analysis of insect pheromones. Z. Naturforsch.30c:722-725.
BAKER, T. C. 1985. Insect mating and courtship behavior, pp. 621-672, inG. A. Kerkut and L. I. Gilbert (eds.). Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Pergamon Press, New York.
BIERL, B. A., BEROZA, M., ADLER, V. E., KASANG, G., SCHRöTER, H., and SCHNEIDER, D. 1975. The presence of disparlure, the sex pheromone of the gypsy moth, in the female nun moth. Z. Naturforsch.30c:672-675.
BEJER, B. 1988. The nun moth in European spruce forest, pp. 211-231, inA. A. Berryman (ed.). Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations: Patterns, Causes, Implications. Plenum Press, New York.
BUTLIN, R. K. 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2:8-13.
BUTLIN, R. K. 1995. Genetic variation in mating signals and responses, pp. 327-366, inD. M. Lambert and H. G. Spencer (eds.). Speciation and Recognition Concept: Theory and Application. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
CARDé, R. T., and BAKER, T. C. 1984. Sexual communication in insects, pp. 355-386, inW. Bell and R. T. Cardé (eds.). Chemical Ecology of Insects. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
CARDé, R. T., CARDé, A. M., HILL, A. S., and ROELOFS, W. L. 1977. Sex pheromone specificity as a reproductive isolating mechanism among the sibling species Archips argyrospilusand A. mortuansand other sympatric Tortricine moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Chem. Ecol.3:71-84.
GRANT, G. G, LANGEVIN, D., LIšKA, J., KAPITOLA, P., and CHONG J. M. 1996. Olefin inhibitor of gypsy moth, Lymantria disparis a synergistic pheromone component of nun moth, L. monacha. Naturwissenschaften83:328-330.
GRAY, T. G., SLESSOR, K. N., SHEPHERD, R. F., GRANT, G. G., and MANVILLE, J. F. 1984. European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): Identification of additional pheromone components resulting in an improved lure. Can. Entomol.116:1525-1532.
GRIES, G., GRIES, R., KHASKIN, G., SLESSOR, K. N., GRANT, G. G., LIšKA J., and KAPITOLA, P. 1996. Specificity of nun and gypsy moth sexual communication through multiple-component pheromone blends. Naturwissenschaften83:382-385.
GRIES, G., GRIES, R., and SCHAEFER, P. W. 1998. Pheromone blend attracts nun moth, Lymantria monacha(Lepidoptera: Lymantiidae) in Japan. Can. Entomol.129:1177-1178.
HILL, A. S., and ROELOFS, W. L. 1979. Sex pheromone components of the oblique-banded leafroller moth Choristoneura rosaceana. J. Chem. Ecol.5:3-11.
KEENA, M., SHIELDS, K., and TORSELLO, M. 1998. Nun moth: potential new pest. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area; NA-PR-95-98, 2 pp.
KLIMETZEK, D., LOSKANT, G., VITé, J. P., and MORI, K. 1976. Disparlure: Differences in pheromone perception between gypsy moth and nun moth. Naturwissenschaften63:581-582.
LINN, C. E., JR., and ROELOFS, W. L. 1995. Pheromone communication in moths and its role in the speciation process, pp. 263-300, inD. M. Lambert and H. G. Spencer (eds.). Speciation and the Recognition Concept. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
LöFSTEDT, C., HERREBOUT, W. M., and MENKEN, S. B. J. 1991. Sex pheromones and their potential role in the evolution of reproductive isolation in small ermine moths (Yponomeutidae). Chemoecology2:20-28.
MCELFRESH, J. S., and MILLAR, J.G. 1999. Geographic variation in sex pheromone blend of Hemileuca electrafrom southern California. J. Chem. Ecol.25:2505-2525.
MOREWOOD, P., GRIES, G., HäUSSLER, D., MöLLER, K., LIšKA, J., KAPITOLA, P., and BOGENSCHüTZ, H. 1999. Towards pheromone-based detection survey of nun moth, Lymantria monacha, in North America. Can. Entomol.131:687-694.
SAS/STAT. 1988. User's guide, release 6.03 edition, SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
SCHAEFER, P. W., GRIES, G., GRIES, R., and HOLDEN, D. 1999. Pheromone components and diel periodicity of pheromonal communication in Lymantria fumida. J. Chem. Ecol.25:2305-2312.
SCHöNHERR, J. 1985. Nun moth outbreak in Poland 1978-1984. Z. Angew. Entomol.99:73-76.
SLIWA, E., and SIERPINSKI, Z. 1986. Gradation der Nonne (Lymantria monachaL.) in Polenvon 1978-1984. Anz. Schaedlingskde. Pflanzen. Umweltschutz59:81-86.
THOMSON, D. R., ANGERILLI, N. P. D., VINCENT, C., and GAUNCE, A. P. 1991. Evidence for regional differences in the response of obliquebanded leafroller [Choristoneura rosaceana(Lepidoptera: Trotricidae)] to sex pheromone blends. Environ. Entomol.20:935-938.
WELLENSTEIN, G. 1978. Lymantria monachaL., Nonnenspinner, Nonne, pp. 207-278, inW. Schwenke (ed.). Die Forstschädlinge Europas, Paul Parey, Hamburg.
VAKENTI, J. M., GAUNCE, A. P., SLESSOR, K. N., KING, G. G. S., ALLAN, S. A., MADSEN, H. F., and BORDEN, J. H. 1988. Sex pheromone components of the oblique-banded leafroller moth, Choristoneura rosaceana, in the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia. J. Chem. Ecol.14:605-621.
ZAR, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 718 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gries, G., Schaefer, P.W., Gries, R. et al. Reproductive Character Displacement in Lymantria monacha from Northern Japan?. J Chem Ecol 27, 1163–1176 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010316029165
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010316029165