Skip to main content

Preface

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  1. Barth, E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue. A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, de Gruyter, Berlin, Wien, New York.

  2. Belnap, N.: 1982, ‘Display Logic’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 4, 375-418.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beth, E. W.: 1955, ‘Semantic Entailment and Formal Derivability’, Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeling Letterkunde 18, 309-342.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blass, A.: 1992, ‘A Game Semantics for Linear Logic’, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 56, 183-220.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blass, A.: 1997, ‘Some Semantical Aspects of Linear Logic’, Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logic 5, 487-503.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Došen, K.: 1988, ‘Sequent Systems and Groupoid Models I’, Studia Logica 47, 353-389.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Felscher, W.: 1986, ‘Dialogues as a Foundation for Intuitionistic Logics’, in D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. III, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 341-372.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fitting, M.: 1983, Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fitting, M.: 1993, ‘Basic Modal Logic’, in D.M. Gabbay, C. J. Hogger and J. A. Robinson (eds), Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 365-448.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gabbay, D. M.: 1996, Labelled Deductive Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gethmann, C. F.: 1979, Protologik. Untersuchungen zur formalen Semantik von Begründungsdiskursen, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp.

  12. Girard, J.-Y.: 1993, ‘Linear Logic: Its Syntax and Semantics’, in J.-Y. Girard, Y. Lafont and L. Regnier (eds), Advances in Linear Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-42.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Girard, J.-Y.: 1998a, ‘On the Meaning of Logical Rules I: Syntax vs. Semantics’, (unpublished manuscript).

  14. Girard, J.-Y.: 1998b, ‘On the Meaning of Logical Rules II: Multiplicatives and Additives’, unpublished manuscript.

  15. Hamblin, C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hintikka, J.: 1996, The Principles of Mathematics Revisited, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hintikka, J.: 1996-1998, Selected Papers, Vols. I-IV, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hintikka, J. and G. Sandu: 1996, ‘A Revolution in Logic?’, Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 1, 169-183.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hyland, M.: 1997, ‘Game Semantics’, in A. Pitts and P. Dybjer (eds), Semantics and Logics of Computation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 131-182.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson, R. H.: 1999, ‘The Relation between Formal and Informal Logic’, Argumentation 13, 265-274.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lorenz, K.: 1981, ‘Dialogical Logic’, in: W. Marciszewski (ed.), Dictionary of Logic as Applied in the Study of Language. Concepts/Methods/Theories, Nijhoff, The Hague, Boston, London, pp. 117-125.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lorenzen, P.: 1958, ‘Logik und Agon’, Arti del XII Congresso Internationale de Filosofia, Venezia, pp. 187-194. (Reprinted in Lorenzen and Lorenz 1978, 1-8.)

  23. Lorenzen, P. and K. Lorenz: 1978, Dialogische Logik,Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.

  24. Naess, A.: 1966, Communication and Argument. Elements of Applied Semantics, Universitaetsforlaget, Allen & Unwin, Oslo, London.

  25. Perelman, C. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1958, La Nouvelle Rhétorique, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Prakken, H. and G. Vreeswijk: 1999, ‘Logics for Defeasible Argumentation’, to appear in D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rahman, S.: 1999a, ‘Ways of Understanding Hugh MacColl's Concept of Symbolic Existence’, to appear in Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic.

  28. Rahman, S.: 1999b, ‘On Frege's Nightmare. A Combination of Intuitionistic, Free and Paraconsistent Logics’, to appear in H. Wansing (ed.), Essays on Non-Classical Logic, King's College University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rahman, S. and W. A. Carnielli: 1998, ‘The Dialogical Approach to Paraconsistency’, FR 5.1 Philosophie, Universität des Saarlandes, Memo No. 8. Also to appear in D. Krause (ed.), Essays on Paraconsistency, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rahman, S. and J. A. Roetti: 1999, ‘Dual Intuitionistic Paraconsistency without Ontological Commitments’, presented at the International Congress: Analytic Philosophy at the Turn of the Millennium in Santiago de Compostela (Spain), 1-4 December 1999.

  31. Rahman, S. and H. Rückert: 1999, ‘Dialogische Modallogik (für T, B, S4, und S5)’, to appear in Logique et Analyse.

  32. Rahman, S., H. Rückert and M. Fischmann: 1999, ‘On Dialogues and Ontology. The Dialogical Approach to Free Logic’, to appear in Logique et Analyse.

  33. Rückert, H.: 1999, ‘Why Dialogical Logic?’, in H. Wansing (ed.), Essays on Non-Classical Logic, King's College University Press, Oxford, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schröder-Heister, P.: 1999, ‘Substructural Logics’, to appear in D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Toulmin, S.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Walton, D. N.: 1984, Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies, University Press of America, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Walton, D. N.: 1985, ‘New Directions in the Logic of Dialogue’, in D. N. Walton (ed.), The Logic of Dialogue, Synthese 63, 259-274.

  38. Wansing, H.: 1994, ‘Sequent Calculi for Normal Modal Propositional Logics’, Journal of Logic Computation 4, 125-142.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wansing, H.: 1998, Displaying Modal Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Woods, J.: 1988, ‘Ideals of Rationality in Dialogic’, Argumentation 2, 395-408.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rahman, S., Rückert, H. Preface. Synthese 127, 1–6 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010314319474

Download citation