Skip to main content
Log in

What Could Turn Out, Actually Speaking

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I distinguish three senses of could turn out/couldhave turned out in an attempt to elucidate how each is connected tothe notion of discovery and how each determines that a statement ofthe form `X could turn out P' (`X could have turned out P') is true.I argue that the actuality-oriented sense of could turn outbest captures what we ordinarily mean when we use could turnout or could have turned out in a nonevidential sense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, J. What Could Turn Out, Actually Speaking. Philosophical Studies 105, 211–236 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010309724733

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010309724733

Navigation