Skip to main content
Log in

Overcontrol in Retirement Communities

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Overcontrol, a personal propensity to control or dominate others, is examined as found in large retirement communities. Aspects of personality theory related to control issues are examined and utilized, particularly social cognitive and cognitive-affective personality system theories. Aspects of social psychological theory, particularly interactional role theory and reference group theory, are also employed. Overcontrol, which is asserted to flourish particularly in large retirement communities, is viewed as a coping device designed to ensure protection against anxiety, and as an intensification of a healthy control trait in the elderly. Three patterns are presented and some approaches to their mitigation are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aleksiuk, M. (1996). Power therapy: Maximizing health through self-efficacy. Seattle: H & H Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, M. W. (1999). Relational schemas: Research into social-cognitive aspects of interpersonal experience. In D. Cervone & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability and organization (pp. 127–154). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bultena, G. (1974). Structural effects on the morale of the aged: A comparison of age-segregated and age-integrated communities. In J. F. Gubrium (Ed.), Late life communities and environmental policy (pp. 18–31). Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bultena, G. & Powers, E. (1976). Effects of age-grade comparisons on adjustment in later life. In J. F. Gubrium (Ed.), Time, roles, and self in old age (pp. 165–178). New York: Human Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervone, D. (1999). Bottom-up explanation in personality psychology: The case of cross-situational coherence. In D. Cervone & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 303–345). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, G. (1999). Working with toxic older adults. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havinghurst, R. J., & Neugarten, B. L. (1969). Disengagement reconsidered in a crossnational context. In R. J. Havighurst, J. M. A. Munnichs, B. Neugarten, & H. Thomae (Eds.), Adjustment to retirement: A crossnational study (pp. 138–146). Assen: Van Gorcum Comp. N. V. Dr. H. J. Prakke & H. M. G. Prakke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1974). Fun city: An ethnographic study of a retirement community. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1975). Older persons and retirement communities: Case studies in social gerontology. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E., & Rodin, J. (1976). The efforts of choice and enhanced personal responsibilities for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theorical perspectives (pp. 51–87). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1999). Personality coherence and dispositions in a cognitive-affective personality system (CAPS) approach. In D. Cervone & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 37–60). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., & Shoda,Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, N. J. (1982). Senior settlers: Social integration in retirement communities. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, S. (1962). The armored. The angry men. In S. Reichard, F. Livson, & P. G. Peterson (Eds.), Aging and personality: A study of 87 older men (pp. 136–154). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, J. (1986a). Aging and health: Effects of the sense of control. Science, 233, 1271–1276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, J. (1986b). Health, control, and aging. In M. M. Baltes & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), The psychology of control and aging (pp. 139–165). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, J., & Langer, E. (1977). Long-term effect of control-relevant intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 897–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussy, C. (1986). Control: Power or impotence? Quarterly Review, 6, 2, 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, R. (1976). Effects of control and predictability on physical and psychological well-being of the institutionalized aged. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 563–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Arizona Republic, August 13, 2000, p. A22.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lapsley, J.N. Overcontrol in Retirement Communities. Pastoral Psychology 49, 439–450 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010301617923

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010301617923

Navigation