Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Size Dependence of Interior-to-Edge Ratios: Size Predominates Shape

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Bogaert, J., P. Van Hecke and I. Impens (1999). A reference value for the interior-to-edge ratio of isolated habitats. Acta Biotheoretica 47: 67-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, J., D. Salvador-Van Eysenrode, P. Van Hecke and I. Impens (2001). Geometrical considerations for evaluation of reserve design. Web Ecology, in press.

  • Diamond, J.M. (1975). The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves. Biological Conservation 7: 129-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, H.S., B.E. DeZonia and D.J. Mladenoff (2000). An aggregation index (AI) to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology 15: 591-601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imre, A.R. (2001). About the ranking of isolated habitats with different shapes: an interior-to-edge study. Acta Biotheoretica 49: 115-120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geography Department, Climate and Vegetation Research Group, Boston University, 675 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    J. Bogaert

Authors
  1. J. Bogaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bogaert, J. Size Dependence of Interior-to-Edge Ratios: Size Predominates Shape. Acta Biotheor 49, 121–123 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010287928739

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010287928739

Keywords

Search

Navigation