Skip to main content
Log in

Clutter Reduction and Detection of Minelike Objects in Ground Penetrating Radar Data Using Wavelets

  • Published:
Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) signatures of shallowly buried landmines are normally obscured by a strong background signal comprised of the reflections from the ground surface and the antenna crosstalk. Based on the notion that buried landmine produces an anomaly in the soil dielectric an automated procedure has been developed which detects soil dieletric anomalies of the size comparable to the size of landmine in GPR data and enhances the signatures of such anomalies. A local background estimate is computed and a soil dielectric anomaly is detected at the spatial position where a change from the estimated background signal occurs. A translation invariant wavelet packet decomposition is applied for detection. The computation takes place in a running window which allows for the algorithm to adapt to the variations in ground conditions and antenna height. The technique was tested using a number of minelike targets buried in several different soil environments and the testing results are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daniels, D. J., 1996, Surface penetrating radar. Radar, sonar, navigation and avionics Series 6: IEE Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chant, I., Washl, J., and Bird, R., 1998, Develoment of ground penetrating radar as a landmine detector: Technical Report DSTO-TR-0653: Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruschini, C., Gros, B., Guerne, F., Piece, P.-Y., and Carmona, O., 1998, Ground penetrating radar and imaging metal detectors for antipersonnel mine detection: Jour. Appl. Geophys., v. 40, p. 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hewer, G., Kuo, G., and Peterson, L., 1996, Adaptive wavelet detection of transients using bootstrap: Proc. SPIE Wavelet Application, v. 2762, Orlando, USA, p. 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, A., and Landsberg, D., 1983, Adapative real-time wavelet detection: IEEE Trans. Biomed. Imag., v. 30, no. 6, p. 332–340.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carmona, R. A., 1993, Wavelet identification of transients in noisy time series: Proc. SPIE Mathematical Imaging, v. 2034, Orlando, USA, p. 392–400.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Noel, S. E., Gohel, Y., and Szu, H. H., 1997, Wavelet detection of singularities in the presence of fractal noise: Proc. SPIE Wavelet Application, v. 3078, Orlando, USA, p. 374–383.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guanghui, Z., Zailu, H., and Zhengquiang, H., 1993, Wavelet packets algorithm and its application in signal detection: Proc. SPIE Mathematical Imaging, v. 2034, Orlando, USA, p. 426–431.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pesquet, J.-C., Krim, H., and Carfantan, H., 1996, Time-invariant orthonormal wavelet representations: IEEE Trans. Signal Process., v. 44, no. 8, p. 1964–1970.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liang, J., and Parks, T. W., 1996, A translation-invariant wavelet representation algorithm with applications: IEEE Trans. Signal Process., v. 44, no. 2, p. 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Del Marco, S., and Weiss, J., 1994, M-band wavepacket-based transient signal detector using a translation-invariant wavelet transform: Optical Eng., v. 33, no. 7, p. 2175–2182.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Simoncelli, E. P., Freedman, W. T., Adelson, E. H., and Heeger, D. J., 1992, Shiftable multiscale transforms: IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, v. 38, no. 2, p. 587–607.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coifman, R. R., and Wickerhauser, M. V., 1992, Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection: IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, v. 38, no. 2, p. 713–718.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daubechies, I., 1988, Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets: Commun. Pure Appl. Math., v. XLI, p. 909–996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bear, M., and Kradolfer, U., 1987, An automatic phase picker for local and teleseismic events: Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., v. 87, no. 6, p. 1437–1445.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wong, B. C. Y., Chant, I., Crisp, G. N., Kappra, K., Strugess, K., Rye, A., and Sherbondy, K., 1997, Suggested soil characterisation techniques and surrogate targets for ultra-wide band radar mine detection experiments: Proc. SPIE AeroSense, v. 3079, Orlando, USA, p. 555–567.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Murray, W., Williams, C. J., and Pollock, J. T. A., 1996, A high resolution radar for mine detection: Proc. EUREL Int. Conf., EICC, Edinburgh, UK, p. 143–147.

  18. Carevic, D., Lee, D., Clonan, L., and Chant, I., 1999, Ground Penetrating Radar Measurement Series, February/March 1999. Internal Divisional Report DSTO-DP-0447: Surveillance Systems Division, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Carevic, D., and Chant, I., Feature extraction and classification of minelike targets from Ground Penetrating Radar data using Gaussian mixture models. Technical report: Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Australia (under review).

  20. Daubechies, I., 1992, Ten lectures on wavelets: SIAM.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carevic, D. Clutter Reduction and Detection of Minelike Objects in Ground Penetrating Radar Data Using Wavelets. Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications 1, 101–118 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010126810896

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010126810896

Navigation