Abstract
The negotiation of international environmental agreements is rendered less effective and more costly than necessary on account of the incentives for rent seeking. This article argues that the problem of rent seeking in this context is complicated by the legitimate demand for the differential treatment of relevant heterogeneity, when insufficient information is available to distinguish between demands based on legitimate differences and rent-seeking. In order to reduce the overall costliness of the totality of international resource agreements, the general rule should be that differential treatment should be provided only in exceptional circumstances. A corollary to this rule is that differences that do not affect future negotiating costs may be considered in current negotiations. This points to differences that are exogenous to the bargaining process, such as a country's physical location. It is argued that development status of a country is another such factor, since the incentives to pursue development are unlikely to be affected by its recognition in current negotiations. Furthermore, the failure to recognise development status as a legitimate basis for differentiated treatment implicitly rewards the early identification and exploitation of unmanaged resources. Restriction of differential treatment to a small number of such differences enables the focusing of negotiations, and the structuring of discussions. A case study of the Montreal Protocol illustrates how the differential impacts of a uniform standard may be estimated, once the range of impacts is delimited.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K. (1962), ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’, in R. R. Nelson, ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Barrett, S. (1993), ‘On the Nature and Significance of International Environmental Agreements’, Oxford Economic Papers 46, 878–894.
Brugmans, I. J. (1971), Paardekracht en Mensenmacht. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Cameron, J. (1994), ‘The Gatt and the Environment’, in P. Sands, ed., Greening International Law. London: Earthscan.
Griffiths, R. T. (1979), Industrial Retardation in the Netherlands: 1830–1850. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Gundling, L. (1986), ‘Multilateral Co-operation of States Under the ECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution’, in C. Flinterman, ed., Transboundary Air Pollution. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hoel, M. (1992), ‘International Environmental Agreements: The Impact of Unilateral Actions’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25, 56–75.
Hoel, M. and K. Schneider (1997), ‘Incentives to Participate in International Environmental Agreements’, Environmental and Resource Economics 9(5), 47–66.
Holz-Eakin, D. and T. Selden (1993), ‘Stoking the Fires’, Journal of Public Economics 57(1), 85–101.
Maler, K. G. (1991), ‘International Environmental Problems’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 6(1), 80–108.
Mason, R. and T. Swanson (1998), ‘The Impact of International Environmental Agreements: The Case of the Montreal Protocol’, CSERGE Discussion Paper 98–13, CSERGE: UEA.
Mokyr, J. (1974), ‘The Industrial Revolution in the Low Countries in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century: A Comparative Case Study’, The Journal of Economic History 31, 1.
Olsen, M. (1974), The Logic of Collective Action. New York: Schoken.
Rothschild and J. Stiglitz (1976), ‘Asymmetric Information and Adverse Selection’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 90(4), 629–649.
Rowland and Molina (1974), ‘The Link between CFC Emissions and Ozone Depletion’, Nature 52, 18–20.
Shiff, E. (1971), Industrialisation Without National Patents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Swanson, T. (1992), ‘The Regulation of Oceanic Resources’, in D. Helm, ed., The Economic Approach to Environmental Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Swanson, T. and S. Johnston (1999), Global Environmental Problems and International Environmental Agreements. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Underdahl, A. (1980), The Political Economy of International Fisheries Management: The Case of NEAFC. Oslo: Universitetsforlagt.
Wiener, J. B. (1999), ‘On the Political Economy of Global Environmental Regulation’, Georgetown Law Journal 87(3), 749–794.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swanson, T. Negotiating Effective International Environmental Agreements: Is an Objective Approach to Differential Treatment Possible?. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 1, 125–153 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010109708847
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010109708847