Abstract
The problem of how physical systems, such as brains, come to representthemselves as subjects in an objective world is addressed. I developan account of the requirements for this ability that draws on and refines work in a philosophical tradition that runs from Kant throughPeter Strawson to Gareth Evans. The basic idea is that the ability torepresent oneself as a subject in a world whose existence isindependent of oneself involves the ability to represent space, andin particular, to represent oneself as one object among others in anobjective spatial realm. In parallel, I provide an account of howthis ability, and the mechanisms that support it, are realizedneurobiologically. This aspect of the article draws on, and refines,work done in the neurobiology and psychology of egocentric andallocentric spatial representation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ammassari-Teule, M., Save, E., de Marsanish, B. and Thinus-Blanc, C., 1998: Posterior parietal cortex lesions severely disrupt spatial learning in DBA mice characterized by a genetic hippocampal dysfunction, Behavioral Brain Res. 95, 85–90.
Andersen, R. A., 1995: Coordinate transformations and motor planning in posterior parietal cortex, in Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Anderson, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C. and Zing, J., 1997: Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements, Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 303–330.
Bach-y-Rita, P., 1972: Brain Mechanisms in Sensory Substitution, Academic Press, New York and London.
Bennett, A. D. T., 1996: Do animals have cognitive maps? J. Experim. Biol. 199, 219–224.
Berkeley, G., 1988: In R. Woolhouse (ed.), The Principles of Human Knowledge, Penguin Books, London.
Bermudez, J. L., 1997: The Paradox of Self-Consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Campbell, J., 1994: Past, Space and Self, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cohen, N. J. and Eichenbuam, H., 1993: Memory, Amnesia, and the Hippocampal System,MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cussins, A., 1998: Subjectivity, objectivity and frames of reference in Evans's theory of thought, in R. Grush (guest ed.), The Philosophy of Gareth Evans: Special Issue of the Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy. At http://www.phil.indiana.edu/ejap/ejap.html
Evans, G., 1982: In J. McDowell (ed.), The Varieties of Reference, Clarendon, Oxford.
Evans, G., 1985a: Things without the mind, in G. Evans (ed.), The Collected Papers of Gareth Evans, Oxford University Press, London.
Evans, G., 1985b: Molyneux's question, in G. Evans (ed.), The Collected Papers of Gareth Evans, Oxford University Press, London.
Farah, M., Sos, M. and Dasheiff, R., 1992: Visual angle of the mind's eye before and after unilateral occipital lobectomy, J. Experim. Psych.: Human Perception and Performance 18, 241–246.
Farber, I., Peterman, W. and Churchland, P. S. (ms): The view from here: Spatial representations.
Farrell, M. J. and Robertson, I. H., 1998: Mental rotation and the automatic updating of bodycentered spatial relationships, J. Experim. Psych.: Learning, Memory and Cognition 24(1), 227–233.
Franklin, N., Tversky, B. and Coon, V., 1992: Switching points of view in spatial mental models, Memory & Cognition 20, 507–518.
Grush, R., 1998: Evans on spatial content, in R. Grush (ed.), The Philosophy of Gareth Evans: Special Issue of the Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy. At http://www.phil.indiana.edu /ejap/ejap.html
Grush, R. (in preparation): The Machinery of Mindedness.
Heil, J., 1987: The molyneux question, J. Theory Social Behav. 17, 227–241.
Hyvarinen, J., 1982: The Parietal Cortex of Monkey and Man, Spinger Verlag, Berlin.
Kant, I., (Kemp-Smith translation, 1929): Critique of Pure Reason, Macmillan, London.
Karnath, H-O., Schenkel, P. and Fischer, B., 1991: Trunk orientation as the determining factor of the 'contralateral' deficit in the neglect syndrome and the physical anchor of the internal representation of body orientation in space, Brain 114, 1997–2014.
Kolb, B., 1990: Postrior parietal and temporal association cortex, in B. Kolb and R. C. Tess (eds), The Cerebral Cortex of the Rat, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 459–471.
Kolb, B. and Walkey, J., 1987: Behavioural and anatomical studies of the posterior parietal cortex in the rat, Behavioural Brain Res. 23, 127–145.
Luzziatti, C., Vecchi, T., Agazzi, D., Cesa-Bianchi, M. and Vergani, C., 1998: A neurological dissociation between preserved visual and impaired spatial processing in mental imagery, Cortex 34, 461–469.
McNaughton, B. L., Leonard, B. and Chen, L. L., 1989: Cortical-hippocampal interactions and cognitive mapping: A hypothesis based on reintegration of the parietal and inferotemporal pathways for visual processing, Psychobiology 17, 236–246.
Maguire, E. A., Frith, C.D., Burgess, N., Donnett, J. G. and O'Keefe, J., 1998: Knowing where things are: parahippocampal involvement in encoding object locations in virtual large-scale space, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10(1), 61–76.
O'Keefe, J. and Dostrovsky, J., 1971: The hippocampus as a spatial map: preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely moving rat, Brain Res. 34, 171–175.
O'Keefe, J. and Nadel, L., 1978: The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map, Clarendon, Oxford.
O'Keefe, J., 1994: Cognitive maps, time and causality, Proc. British Academy 83, 35–45. Reprinted in C. Peacocke (ed.), 1994: Objectivity, Simulation, and the Unity of Consciousness, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Olson, C. R. and Gettner, S. N., 1996: Brain representation of object-centered space, Current Opinion Neurobiol. 6, 165–170.
Petrosini, L., Leggio, M. G. and Molinari, M., 1998: The cerebellum in the spatial problem solving: a co-star or a guest star? Progr. Neurobiol. 56, 191–210.
Poucet, B., 1993: Spatial cognitive maps in animals: New hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms, Psychol. Rev. 100(2), 163–182.
Pouget, A. and Sejnowski, T., 1997: Spatial transformations in the Parietal Cortex using basis functions, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9(2), 222–237.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., McNamera, T. P., Shelton, A. L. and Carr, W., 1998: Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent, J. Experim. Psychol.: Learning, Memory and Cognition 24(1), 215–226.
Stein, J. F., 1991:Space and the parietal association areas, in J. Paillard (ed.), Brain and Space, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Strawson, P. F., 1959: Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, Routledge, London.
Tolman, E. C., 1948: Cognitive maps in rats and men, Psychol. Rev. 55, 189–208.
Yantis, S., 1993: Stimulus driven attention capture, Current Directions Psychol. Sci. 2(5), 156–161.
Zipser, D. and Andersen, R. A., 1988: A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons, Nature 331(6158), 679–684.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grush, R. Self, World and Space: The Meaning and Mechanismsof Ego- and Allocentric Spatial Representation. Brain and Mind 1, 59–92 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010039705798
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010039705798