Skip to main content
Log in

Teams, Firms and the Evolution of Profit Seeking Behavior

  • Published:
Journal of Bioeconomics

Abstract

Even as advances in information theory over the last quarter century have cast increasing doubt on the proposition that firms successfully maximize profits, the objective of profit maximization continues to be an axiomatic feature of the neoclassical theory of the firm. This paper attempts to improve our understanding firms by treating the objective function as an open question. Specifically, an ontogenetic thought experiment is undertaken to address the question of what differentiates production teams from firms by asking why team members would sell their control rights to a principal, thereby transforming the team into a firm. What results is an account of the emergence of the objective of profit seeking. Profit seeking emerges endogenously as a more fit alternative than the objective of value maximization, which is less capable of coping with uncertainty through purposive adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Alchian, Armen. A. 1950. Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 58: 211-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, Armen. A. & Harold Demsetz. 1972. Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review 62: 777-795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert. 1997.The complexity of cooperation: agent based models of competitionandcollaboration. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Young Back. 1993. Paradigms and conventions: uncertainty, decision making, and entrepreneurship. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4: 386-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Robert. 1979. Human behavior: an economic approach. Duxbury Press, North Scituate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enke, Stephen. 1951. On maximizing profits: a distinction between chamberlin and robinson. American Economic Review 41: 566-578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Oliver. 1995. Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Oliver & John Moore. 1990. Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of PoliticalEconomy98: 1119-1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, Jack. 1978. Natural economy versus political economy. Journal of Social Biological Structures 1: 319-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, Jack. 1982. Evolutionary models in economics and law: cooperation versus conflict strategies. Research in Law and Economics 4: 1-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, Bengt. 1982. Moral hazard in teams. Bell Journal of Economics 13: 324±340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, Bengt & Paul Milgrom. 1994. The firm as an incentive system. American Economic Review 84: 972-991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Benjamin, Robert G. Crawford & Armen A. Alchian. 1978. Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. Journal of Law and Economics 21: 297-326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Frank. 1921. Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, Janet. 1981.Atheory of the ethnically homogeneous middleman group: an institutional alternative to contract law. Journal of Legal Studies 10: 349-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, Paul & John Roberts. 1992. Economics, organization and management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard & Sidney Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1961. The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: ®rms, markets, and relational contracting. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Sidney. 1964. Economic `natural selection' and the theory of the firm. Yale Economic Essays 4: 225-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Sidney. 1971. Satisficing, selection, and the innovating remnant. Quarterly Journal of Economics 85: 237-261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, Ulrich. 1986. Evolution and stability of cooperation without enforceable contracts. Kyklos 39: 245-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, Ulrich. 1998. Imagination and leadership-the neglected dimension of an evolutionary theory of the firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 35: 161-177.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rose, D.C. Teams, Firms and the Evolution of Profit Seeking Behavior. Journal of Bioeconomics 2, 25–39 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010039609636

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010039609636

Navigation