Prevention Science

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Drug Abuse Prevention Among Minority Adolescents: Posttest and One-Year Follow-Up of a School-Based Preventive Intervention

  • Gilbert J. Botvin
  • Kenneth W. Griffin
  • Tracy Diaz
  • Michelle Ifill-Williams
Article

Abstract

Most drug abuse prevention research has been conducted with predominantly White middle-class adolescent populations. The present study tested a school-based drug abuse preventive intervention in a sample of predominantly minority students (N = 3,621) in 29 New York City schools. The prevention program taught drug refusal skills, antidrug norms, personal self-management skills, and general social skills in an effort to provide students with skills and information for resisting drug offers, to decrease motivations to use drugs, and decrease vulnerability to drug use social influences. Results indicated that those who received the program (n = 2,144) reported less smoking, drinking, drunkenness, inhalant use, and polydrug use relative to controls (n = 1,477). The program also had a direct positive effect on several cognitive, attitudinal, and personality variables believed to play a role in adolescent substance use. Mediational analyses showed that prevention effects on some drug use outcomes were mediated in part by risk-taking, behavioral intentions, and peer normative expectations regarding drug use. The findings from this study show that a drug abuse prevention program originally designed for White middle-class adolescent populations is effective in a sample of minority, economically disadvantaged, inner-city adolescents.

drug abuse minority youth school-based prevention longitudinal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1988). The effects of school-based substance abuse education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Drug Education, 18, 243–264.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, G. M., & Welte, J. W. (1986). Adolescent alcohol abuse: Subgroup differences and relationships to other problem behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1,79–94.Google Scholar
  4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal ofPersonality & Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.Google Scholar
  5. Botvin, G. J. (1986). Substance abuse prevention research: Recent developments and future directions. Journal of School Health, 56, 369–374.Google Scholar
  6. Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L. D., Botvin, E. M., & Diaz, T. (1995a). Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a White middle-class population. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1106–1112.Google Scholar
  7. Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., Tortu, S., & Botvin, E. M. (1990). Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive–behavioral approach: Results of a three-year study. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 58, 437–446.Google Scholar
  8. Botvin, G. J., Batson, H., Witts-Vitale, S., Bess, V., Baker, E., & Dusenbury, L. (1989a). A psychosocial approach to smoking prevention for urban black youth. Public Health Reports, 104, 573–582.Google Scholar
  9. Botvin, G. J., & Botvin, E. M. (1997). School-based programs. In J. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook (3rd Ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  10. Botvin, E. M., Botvin, G. J., Renick, N. L., Filazzola, A. D., & Allegrante, J. P. (1984). Adolescents self-reports of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use: Examining the comparability of video tape, cartoon, and verbal bogus pipeline procedures. Psychological Reports, 55, 379–386.Google Scholar
  11. Botvin, G. J., Dusenbury, L., Baker, E., James-Ortiz, S., Botvin, E. M., & Kerner, J. (1992). Smoking prevention among urban minority youth: Assessing effects on outcome and mediating variables. Health Psychology, 11, 290–299.Google Scholar
  12. Botvin, G. J., Dusenbury, L., Baker, E., James-Ortiz, S., & Kerner, J. (1989b). A skills training approach to smoking prevention among Hispanic youth. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12, 279–296.Google Scholar
  13. Botvin, G. J., Epstein, J. A., Baker, E., Diaz, T., Ifill-Williams, M., Miller, N., & Cardwell, J. (1997). School-based drug abuse prevention with inner-city minority youth. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 6, 5–19.Google Scholar
  14. Botvin, G. J., Griffin, K. W., Diaz, T., Scheier, L. M., Williams, C., & Epstein, J. A. (2000). Preventing illicit drug use in adolescents: Long-term follow-up data from a randomized control trial of a school population. Addictive Behaviors, 5, 769–774.Google Scholar
  15. Botvin, G. J., Renick, N. L., & Baker, E. (1983). The effects of scheduling format and booster sessions on a broad-spectrum psychosocial smoking prevention program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 6, 359–379.Google Scholar
  16. Botvin, G. J., Schinke, S. P., Epstein, J. A., & Diaz, T., (1994). Effectiveness of culturally-focused and generic skills training approaches to alcohol and drug abuse prevention among minority youths. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 8, 116–127.Google Scholar
  17. Botvin, G. J., Schinke, S. P., Epstein, J. A., Diaz, T., & Botvin, E. M. (1995b). Effectiveness of culturally-focused and generic skills training approaches to alcohol and drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: Two-year follow-up results. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 9, 183–194.Google Scholar
  18. Bruvold, W. H, & Rundall, T. G. (1988). A meta-analysis and theoretical review of school based tobacco and alcohol intervention programs. Psychology and Health, 2, 53–78.Google Scholar
  19. Bugen, L. A., & Hawkins, R.C. (1981). The Coping Assessment Battery: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  20. Ellickson, P., & Bell, R. M. (1990). Drug prevention in junior high: A multi-site longitudinal test. Science, 247, 1299–1305.Google Scholar
  21. Evans, R. I., Hansen, W. B., & Mittlemark, M. B. (1977). Increasing the validity of self-reports of smoking behavior in children. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 521–523.Google Scholar
  22. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  23. Flay, B. R. (1985). What we know about the social influences approach to smoking prevention: Review and recommendations. InC. S. Bell & R. Battjes (Eds.), Prevention research: Deterring drug abuse among children (NIDAResearch Monograph #63). Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  24. Gambrill, E.D., & Richey, C.A. (1975). An assertion inventory for use in assessment and research. Behavior Therapy, 6, 550–561.Google Scholar
  25. Goodstadt, M. S. (1986). Drug education: The prevention issues. Journal of Drug Education, 19, 197–208.Google Scholar
  26. Groemping, U. (1994). GEE: A SAS macro for longitudinal data analysis. Dortmund: University of Dortmund, Department of Statistics.Google Scholar
  27. Hansen, W. B. (1992). School-based substance prevention: A review of the state-of-the-art in curriculum. Health Education Research, 7, 403–430.Google Scholar
  28. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64–105.Google Scholar
  29. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Johnston, L.D., O Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J.G. (1998). National survey results on drug use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975–1997,Vol.I: Secondary school students (NIH Pub. No. 98-4345). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  31. McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 192–227). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Murray, D. M., Hannan, P. J. (1990). Planning for the appropriate analysis in school-based drug-use prevention studies. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 58, 45–468.Google Scholar
  33. Norton, E. C., Bieler, G. S., Ennett, S. T., & Zarkin, G. A. (1996). Analysis of prevention program effectiveness with clustered data using generalized estimating equations. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 64, 919–926.Google Scholar
  34. Oetting, E. R., & Beauvais, F. (1990). Adolescent drug use: Findings of national and local surveys. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 58, 385–394.Google Scholar
  35. Pandina, R. J. (1997). Risk and protective factor models in adolescent drug use: Putting them to work for prevention. In National conference on drug abuse prevention research: presentations, papers, and recommendations,U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  36. Pentz, M. A., Dwyer, J. H., MacKinnon, D. P., Flay, B. R., Hansen, W.B., Wang, E.Y., & Johnson, C. A. (1989).Amulticommunity trial for primary prevention of adolescent drug abuse. Effects on drug prevalence. Journal of American Medical Association, 261, 3259–3266.Google Scholar
  37. SAS Institute (1996). SAS/STAT User s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Tobler, N. S. (1986). Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs: Quantitative outcome results of program participants compared to a control or comparison group. Journal of Drug Issues, 16, 537–567.Google Scholar
  39. Tobler, N. S., & Stratton, H. H. (1997). Effectiveness of schoolbased drug prevention programs: A meta-analysis of the research. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 71–128.Google Scholar
  40. Tortu, S., & Botvin, G. J. (1989). School-based smoking prevention: The teacher training process. Preventive Medicine, 18, 280–289.Google Scholar
  41. Trimble, J. E. (1995). Toward an understanding of ethnicity and ethnic identity, and their relationship with drug use research. InG. J. Botvin, S. Schinke, & M. A. Orlandi (Eds.), Drug abuse prevention with multiethnic youth (pp. 3–27). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. U.S. Public Health Service (1974). Teenager s Self-Test: Cigarette Smoking, U.S. Public Health Service.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilbert J. Botvin
    • 1
  • Kenneth W. Griffin
    • 1
  • Tracy Diaz
    • 1
  • Michelle Ifill-Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Prevention ResearchWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNew York

Personalised recommendations