Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Satellite Images to Classify and Analyze the Health of Hemlock Forests Infested by the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid

  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method is described to classify stands of eastern hemlock by health condition, at the landscape level, using remote sensing. The hemlock woolly adelgid has been a major cause of hemlock decline in Connecticut since 1985, resulting in varying degrees of defoliation in the region. A 1985 Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) image was classified to develop a base line of once healthy hemlock stands. Radiance normalization and non-hemlock masking techniques were used to pre-process a 1995 TM image. Several techniques were used to transform the 1995 TM image; each was followed by cluster analysis to separate hemlocks into four levels of tree vigor. We evaluated 600 trees at 150 sites across the study area using the USFS Crown Condition Rating Guide. These field data were used to measure the accuracy of various health classification techniques. The Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index-2 (MSAVI2) transform provided the best overall accuracy, 82.1%, for classifying hemlock according to tree vigor. Non-parametric statistics were used to determine if there were any significant variations in distribution of hemlock pixels by health class in association with features in the landscape. Several features were found to be statistically significant at a confidence level of 0.001. These were aspect of slope, hydrology group (infiltration rate), depth to bedrock, soil order, drainage class (hydraulic conductivity), and surface texture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benzinger J (1994) Hemlock Decline and Breeding Birds. Records of New Jersey Birds 20(1): 2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez PS (1988) An Improved Dark-Object Subtraction Technique for Atmospheric Scattering Correction of Multispectral Data. Remote Sensing of the Environment 24: 459–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff AD and Ord JK (1973) Spatial Autocorrelation. Pion, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of the Environment 37: 35–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG and Green K (1999) Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist EP and Cicone RC (1984) Application of the Tasseled Cap concept to simulated Thematic Mapper data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 50: 343–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebdon D (1990) Statistics in Geography, 2nd edn, Billing and Sons Ltd, Worcester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman RM and Lancaster K (1990) Tsuga canadensis — Eastern Hemlock in Silvics of North America: Vol 1 Conifers. USDA Forest Service Agriculture Handbook 654

  • Jenkins JC, Aber JD and Canham CD (1999) Hemlock woolly adelgid impacts on community structure and N cycling rates in eastern hemlock forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 630–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Joria PE, Ahearn SC and Connor M (1991) A comparison of the SPOT and Landsat Thematic Mapper satellite systems for detecting gypsy moth defoliation in Michigan. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 57: 1605–1612

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen N (1978) A Sierra Club Naturalist's Guide — Southern New England. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, California, 417 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: Trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74(6): 1659–1673

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebhold AM, Hohn E and Gribko LS (1993) Forecasting the spatial dynamics of gypsy moth defoliation using 3-dimensional kriging. In: Liebhold AM and Barrett HR (eds) Proceedings: Spatial Analysis and Forest Pest Management, Mountain Lakes, Virginia, USA, 27–30 April 1992, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-175, pp 150–159

  • McClure M (1987) Hemlock woolly adelgid may also attack spruce. Frontiers of Plant Science. Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut 39: 7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure M (1989) Evidence of a polymorphic life cycle in the hemlock woolly adelgid, Adelges tsugae (Homoptera: Adelgidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 82: 50–54

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure M (1991) Density-dependent feedback and population cycles in Adelges tsugae (Homoptera: Adelgidae) on Tsuga canadensis. Environmental Entomology 20: 258–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Millers I, Anderson R, Burkman W and Hoffard W (1992) Forest Health Monitoring, Crown Condition Rating Guide. USDA Forest Service. State and Private Forestry Northeastern Area and Southern Region

  • Muchoney, DM and Haack BN (1994) Change detection for monitoring forest defoliation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 60: 1243–1251

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwig DA and Foster DR (1998) Forest response to the introduced hemlock woolly adelgid in southern New England, USA. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 125(1): 60–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi J, Chehbouni A, Huete AR, Kerr YH and Sorooshian S (1994) A modified soil adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sensing of the Environment 48: 119–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray TW (1994) A FAQ on Vegetation in Remote Sensing 〈ftp://kepler.gps.caltech.edu/pub/terrill/rsvegfaq.txt〉 (March 18, 1996)

  • Reich RM and Geils BW (1993) Review of spatial analysis techniques. In: Liebhold AM and Barrett HR (eds) Proceedings: Spatial Analysis and Forest Pest Management, Mountain Lakes, Virginia, USA, 27–30 April 1992, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-175, pp 142–149

  • Royle DD and Lathrop RG (1997) Monitoring hemlock forest health in New Jersey using Landsat TM data and change detection techniques. Forest Science 43(3): 327–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL (1990) Ecology and Field Biology, 4th edn, HarperCollins

  • Suoto D, Luther T and Chianese R (1996) Past and current status of HWA in Eastern and Carolina Hemlock Stands, In: Salmon SM, Tigner TC and Reardon RC (eds) Proceedings of the First Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Review, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA, 12 October 1995, USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, pp 9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, RF, Shields KS and Berlyn GP (1995) Hemlock woolly adelgid (Homoptera: Adelgidae): stylet bundle insertion and feeding sites. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 88: 827–835

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources Management and Engineering, Laboratory for Earth Resources Information Systems, The University of Connecticut, USA

    Laurent R. Bonneau & Daniel L. Civco

  2. Center for Earth Observation, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA (e-mail: laurent.bonneau@yale.edu; fax: +1-203-432-3134)

    Kathleen S. Shields

Authors
  1. Laurent R. Bonneau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathleen S. Shields
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel L. Civco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonneau, L.R., Shields, K.S. & Civco, D.L. Using Satellite Images to Classify and Analyze the Health of Hemlock Forests Infested by the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid. Biological Invasions 1, 255–267 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010021629127

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010021629127

Search

Navigation