Seeing More Than Right and Wrong Answers: Prospective Teachers' Interpretations of Students' Mathematical Work

Abstract

Listening to students' mathematical thinking is one of the trademarks of reform-minded visions of mathematics teaching. The questions of when, where, how, and what might help prospective teachers learn to do so,however, remain open. This study examines how a mathematics letter exchange with Grade 4 students provided an occasion for prospective teachers to learn about students' mathematical thinking and to examine their interpretive practices. Analysis of the interactions between students and prospective teachers, and of the reflective writing of the latter,revealed changes in the patterns of their interpretations. I characterized these as changes in the focus of interpretation, from correctness to meaning, and in the interpretive approach, from quick and conclusive to thoughtful and tentative. I also discuss factors associated with these interpretive turns.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, J. (1992). Journal writing: The promise and the reality. Journal of Reading, 36, 304–309.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ball, D.L. (1988). Unlearning to teach mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(1), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ball, D.L. (1990). Breaking with experience in learning to teach mathematics: The role of a preservice methods course. For the Learning of Mathematics, 10(2), 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ball, D.L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 371–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ball, D.L. (1994, November). Developing mathematics reform: What don't we know about teacher learning - but would make good working hypotheses? Paper presented at the conference on Teacher Enhancement K-6, Arlington, VA.

  6. Ball, D.L. Chazan, D. (1994). An examination of teacher telling in constructivist mathematics pedagogy: Not just excusable but essential. Unpublished manuscript. East Lansing: Michigan State University. [Cited with author's permission].

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brophy, J. Good, T. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, J.S., Collins, A. Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burns, M. (1987). A collection of math lessons: From grades 3 through 6. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cobb, P. (1988). The tension between theories of learning and instruction in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 23, 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Crespo, S. (1998). Math penpals as a context for learning to teach: A study of preservice teachers’ learning. Dissertation Abstracts International 59-05A: 1530.

  12. Davis, B. (1996). Teaching mathematics: Toward a sound alternative. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duckworth, E. (1987). The having of wonderful ideas (and other essays on teaching and learning). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feiman-Nemser, S. Buchmann, M. (1986). Pitfalls of experience in teacher preparation. In J. Raths L. Katz (Eds.), Advances in teacher education, Vol. 2 (pp. 61–73). Norwood, NJ: Albex.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Good, T. (1987). Two decades of research on teacher expectations: Findings and future directions. Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Holt-Reynolds, D. (1995, April). Learning teaching, teaching teachers. Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

  17. Kamii, C. (1989). Young children continue to re-invent arithmetic: Implications of Piaget's theory. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maher, C.A. Davis, R.A. (1990). Teacher's learning: Building representations of children's meanings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (Monograph No. 4), 79–90.

  19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nicol, C. (1997). Learning to teach prospective teachers to teach mathematics. Dissertation Abstracts International 58-06A: 2168.

  21. Phillips, E. Crespo, S. (1996). Developing written communication in mathematics through math penpals. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(1), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Richert, A.E. (1992). The content of student teachers’ reflections within different structures for facilitating the reflective process. In T. Russel H. Munby (Eds.), Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection (pp. 171–191). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smith, J.P. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 387–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wassermann, S. (1993). Getting down to cases: Learning to teach with case studies. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson, S. (1990). The secret garden of teacher education. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 204–209.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crespo, S. Seeing More Than Right and Wrong Answers: Prospective Teachers' Interpretations of Students' Mathematical Work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 3, 155–181 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009999016764

Download citation

Keywords

  • Teacher Education
  • Preservice Teacher
  • Prospective Teacher
  • Mathematics Classroom
  • Mathematical Thinking