Skip to main content
Log in

Market-based approaches for controlling space mission costs: the Cassini Resource Exchange

  • Published:
Journal of Reducing Space Mission Cost

Abstract

Using economic incentives to control costs is a new concept for space missions. The basic tenets of market-based approaches run counter to typical centralized management techniques often utilized for complex space missions. NASA's Cassini mission to Saturn used a market trading system to assist the Science Instrument Manager in guiding the development of the spacecraft's science payload. This system allowed science instrument teams to trade resources among themselves to best manage their resources (mass, power, data rate, and budget). Thus, Cassini Project management was no longer responsible for adjudicating and reallocating resources that result from instrument development problems. Instrument teams were responsible for directly managing their resources and if they ran into a development problem it was their responsibility to resolve their problem by descoping or through the use of a 'resource exchange.' Under the trading system, instrument cost growth was less than 1% and the total payload mass was under its allocation by 7%. This result is in stark contrast to the 50%–100% increases in these resources on past missions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G.: 1970, The market for 'lemons': Qualitative uncertainty and the marketmechanism, Quart. J. Econ. 89, 488–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.: 1963, Uncertainty and the welfareeconomics of medical care, Am. Econ. Rev. 53, 941–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassini Project Policies & RequirementsDocument, JPL PD 699-004, Rev. D, 1995 September, pp. 43–45.

  • CSP Associates, Inc.: 1993,Science Systems Contract Study, Final Report, Vol. 1, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, W. G. to PIs and TeamLeaders, JPL Memorandum re: Mass Auction Results, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, 1993 May 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R.: 1995, Could gambling save science? Encouraging an honest consensus,Soc. Epist. 90, 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J.: 1989, The Economics of Uncertainty and Information. MITPress.

  • Ledyard, J. O., Porter, D., Rangel, A.: 1994, Using computerized exchange systems to solve anallocation problem in project management, J. Org. Comp. 4, 271–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C.: 1994, Marketarchitectures, institutional landscapes and testbed experiments, Economic Theory, Vol 4.

  • Polk, C.,Mars Observer Project History, JPL D-8095, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California, 1990 December.

  • Polk, C.: 1994, Subcomponent Innovation and Moral Hazard: Where Technological ProgressMeets the Division of Labor, Caltech Social Science Working Paper 895, Pasadena, CA.

  • Ruskin, A.:1982, What Every Engineer Should Know About Project Management. M. Dekker, New York.

  • Wessen, R. and Porter, D.: 1997, A management approach for allocating instrument developmentresources, Space Policy 13(3), 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wessen, R.R., Porter, D. Market-based approaches for controlling space mission costs: the Cassini Resource Exchange. Journal of Reducing Space Mission Cost 1, 9–25 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009990907796

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009990907796

Navigation