Skip to main content
Log in

Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Israel

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study examines the effect of ownership structure on firm performance. We distinguish between family firms, firms controlled by partnerships of individuals, concern controlled firms, and firms where blockholders have less than 50% of the vote. The empirical work analyzes data on 280 Israeli firms and employs the technique of Data Envelopment Analysis. It is found that owner-manager firms are less efficient in generating net income than firms managed by a professional (non-owner) manager, and that family firms run by their owners perform (relatively) the worst. This evidence suggests that the modern form of business organization, namely the open corporation with disperse ownership and non-owner managers, promotes firm performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

eferences

  • Ang, J., S. Hauser and B. Lauterbach: 1997, “Top Executive Compensation under Alternative Ownership and Governance Structure: Evidence from Israel”, Advances in Financial Economics3: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A. and G. Means: 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. and K. Lehn: 1985, “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences”, Journal of Political Economy93: 1155–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elyasiani, E. and S. Mehdian: 1992, “Productive Efficiency Performance of Minority and Non-Minority-Owned Banks: A Non-Parametric Approach”,Journal of Banking and Finance 16(5): 933–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.: 1980, “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm”, Journal of Political Economy88: 288–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. and M. Jensen: 1983, “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. and W. Meckling: 1976, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics 4: 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, J. and H. Servaes: 1990, “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value”, Journal of Financial Economics 27: 595–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., A. Shleifer and R. Vishny: 1988, “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Financial Economics20: 292–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K.: 1985, “Corporate Performance and Managerial Remuneration: An Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 7: 11–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K.: 1998, Executive Compensation, Working Paper (University of Southern California).

  • Rosen, S.: 1982, “Authority, Control and the Distribution of Earnings”, Bell Journal of Economics 13: 311–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M. and R. M. Thrall: 1990, “Recent Developments in DEA: The Mathematical Programming Approach to Frontier Analysis”, Journal of Econometrics46: 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, H.: 1994, “Ownership, Control, Financial Structure and the Performance of Firms”, Journal of Economic Surveys 8(3): 203–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E.: 1964, The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lauterbach, B., Vaninsky, A. Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Israel. Journal of Management & Governance 3, 189–201 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009990008724

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009990008724

Navigation