Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 235–251 | Cite as

Improving sampling designs for measuring restoration in aquatic habitats

  • M.G. Chapman
Article

Abstract

Restoration of degraded habitat is an increasingly important toll for management. Unfortunately, much of the emphasis has been on restoring large structural elements of habitat (e.g. planting vegetation,removing weeds), with little consideration about how well these activities restore ecologically functioning habitat. There has been considerable research in recent years into improving sampling designs and analytical techniques to measure the effects of environmental impacts taking into account the large spatial and temporal variability that occurs naturally in undisturbed habitats. In a similar manner to detection of impacts, restoration needs to be measured as an interaction between spatial and temporal components of variation against a variable background. Very few studies of restoration have explicitly addressed how best to do this. Neither have they attempted to assess the usefulness of some of these new techniques for measuring restoration. This review discusses some of the problems that need to be considered when measuring restoration and the potential value of some of these new methodologies.

analyses aquatic restoration sampling design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam, P., 1995. Reversing the trend. Wetlands (Australia) 14: 1–5.Google Scholar
  2. Addison, R.F. & K.R. Clarke (eds), 1990. Biological effects on pollutants in a subtropical environment. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 138: 1–166.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, P., 1995. Ecological restoration and creation: a review. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 56: 187–211.Google Scholar
  4. Bayne, B.L., K.R. Clarke & J.S. Gray (eds), 1988. Biological effects of pollutants. Results of a practical workshop. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 46: 1–278.Google Scholar
  5. Bender, E.A., T.J. Case & M.E. Gilpin, 1984. Perturbation experiments in community ecology. Ecology 65: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernstein, B.B. & J. Zalinski, 1983. An optimal sampling design and power tests for environmental biologists. Environ. Manage. 16: 335–343.Google Scholar
  7. Botkin, D.B., 1990. Discordant Harmonies: A New Ecology for the Twenty-first Century. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Bradshaw, A.D., 1987. Restoration: an acid test for ecology. In: W.J. Jordon, M.E. Gilpin & J.D. Aber (eds), Restoration Ecology: A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 23–29.Google Scholar
  9. Bray, J.R. & J.T. Curtis, 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27: 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brinson, M.M. & R. Rheinhardt, 1996. The role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation. Ecol. Appl. 6: 69–76.Google Scholar
  11. Cairns, J. Jr., 1990. Lack of theoretical basis for predicting rate and pathways of recovery. Environ. Manage. 14: 517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapman, M.G., 1998. Relationships between spatial patterns of benthic assemblages in a mangrove forest using different levels of taxonomic resolution. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 162: 71–78.Google Scholar
  13. Chapman, M.G. & A.J. Underwood, 1997. Concepts and issues in restoration of mangrove forests in urban environments. In: N. Klomp & I. Lunt (eds), Frontiers in Ecology: Building the Links. Elsevier Science, Oxford: 103–114.Google Scholar
  14. Chapman, M.G. & A.J. Underwood, 1999. The need for a practical scientific protocol to measure successful restoration. Wetlands (Australia) (in review).Google Scholar
  15. Chapman, M.G., A.J. Underwood & G.A. Skilleter, 1995. Variability at different spatial scales between a subtidal assemblage exposed to the discharge of sewage and two control assemblages. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 189: 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke, K.R., 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18: 117–143.Google Scholar
  17. Clarke, K.R. & M. Ainsworth, 1993. A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 92: 205–219.Google Scholar
  18. Clarke, K.R. & R.H. Green, 1988. Statistical design & analysis for a ‘biological effects’ study. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 46: 213–226.Google Scholar
  19. Clarke, K.R. & R.M. Warwick, 1998. Quantifying structural redundancy in ecological communities. Oecologia (Berl.) 113: 278–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Connell, J.H., 1978. Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302–1310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Dawson-Shepherd, A., R.M. Warwick, K.R. Clarke & B.E. Brown, 1992. An analysis of fish community responses to coral mining in the Maldives. Environ. Biol. Fish. 33: 367–380.Google Scholar
  22. Den Boer, P.J., 1968. Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers. Acta Biotheor. 18: 165–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Detenbeck, N.E., P.W. DeVore, J.G. Niemi & A. Lima, 1992. Recovery of temperate-stream fish communities from disturbance: a review of case studies and synthesis of theory. Environ. Manage. 16: 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Edwards, C.J., B.L. Griswold, R.A. Tubb, E.C. Weber & L.C. Woods, 1984. Mitigating effects of artificial riffles and pools on the fauna of a channelized warmwater stream. N. Amer. J. Fish. Manage. 4: 194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferrell, D.J., S.E. McNeill, D.G. Worthington & J.D. Bell, 1993. Temporal and spatial variation in the abundance of fish associated with the seagrass Posidonia australisin south-eastern Australia. Aust. J. mar. Freshwater Res. 44: 881–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Galatowitsch, S.M. & A.G. van der Valk, 1996. Characteristics of recently restored wetlands in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 16: 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Galatowitsch, S.M., D.C. Whited & J.R. Tester, 1999. Development of community metrics to evaluate recovery in Minnesota wetlands. J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress and Recovery 6: 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gillanders, B.M., 1997. Patterns of abundance and size structure in the blue groper, Achoerodus viridis(Pisces, Labridae): evidence of links between estuaries and coastal reefs. Env. Biol. Fish. 49: 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glasby, T.M. & A.J. Underwood, 1996. Sampling to differentiate between pulse and press perturbations. Environ. Monitor. Assess. 42: 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glasby, T.M. & A.J. Underwood, 1998. Determining positions for control locations in environmental studies of estuarine marinas. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 171: 1–14.Google Scholar
  31. Gray, J.S., M. Aschan, M.R. Carr, K.R. Clarke, R.H. Green, T.H. Pearson, R. Rosenberg & R.M. Warwick, 1988. Analysis of community attributes of the benthic macrofauna of Frierfjord/Langesundfjord and in a mesocosm experiment. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 46: 151–165.Google Scholar
  32. Grayson, J.E., M.G. Chapman & A.J. Underwood, 1998. The assessment of restoration of habitat in urban wetlands. Landsc. Urb. Plan. 43: 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Green, R.H., 1979. Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Hobbs, R.J. & D.A. Norton, 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor. Ecol. 4: 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hurlbert, S.H., 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54: 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jenkins, G.P., M.J. Keough & P.A. Hamer, 1998. The contributions of habitat structure and larval supply to broad-scale recruitment variability in a temperate zone, seagrass-associated fish. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 226: 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kane, G.S., 1994. Restoration or preservation? Reflections on a clash of environmental philosophies. In: A.D. Baldwin Jr., J. de Luce & C. Pletsch (eds), Beyond Preservation: Restoring & Inventing Landscapes. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis: 69–84.Google Scholar
  38. Karr, J.R., K.D. Fausch, P.L. Angermeier, P.R. Yant & I.J. Schlosser, 1986. Assessing Biological Integrity in Running Waters: A Method & its Rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey, Illinois.Google Scholar
  39. Kentula, M.E., R.P. Brooks, S.E. Gwin, C.C. Holland, A.D. Sherman & J.C. Sifneos, 1992. An Approach to Improving Decision Making in Wetland Restoration and Creation. Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon.Google Scholar
  40. Langis, R., M. Zalejko & J.B. Zedler, 1991. Nitrogen assessments in a constructed and a natural saltmarsh of San Diego Bay. Ecol. Appl. 1: 40–51.Google Scholar
  41. Lawton, J.H., 1996. Patterns in ecology. Oikos 75: 145–147.Google Scholar
  42. Legendre, P. & M.J. Anderson, 1999. Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multi-species responses in multi-factorial ecological experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 69: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McDonald, L.L. & W.P. Erickson, 1994. Testing for bio-equivalence in field studies: has a disturbed site been adequately reclaimed? In: D.J. Fletcher & B.F. Manly (eds), Statistics and Environmental Monitoring. University of Otago Press, Dunedin: 183–197.Google Scholar
  44. Mitsch, W.J. & R.F. Wilson, 1996. Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecol. Appl. 6: 77–83.Google Scholar
  45. Morrisey, D.J., L. Howitt, A.J. Underwood & J.S. Stark, 1992a. Spatial variation in soft-sediment benthos. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 81: 197–204.Google Scholar
  46. Morrisey, D.J., A.J. Underwood, L. Howitt & J.S. Stark, 1992b. Temporal variation in soft-sediment benthos. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 164: 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moy, L.D. & L.A. Levin, 1991. Are Spartinamarshes a replaceable resource? A functional approach to evaluation of marsh creation efforts. Estuaries 14: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Naeem, S., 1998. Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conserv. Biol. 12: 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Niemi, G.J., P. DeVore, N. Detenbeck, D. Taylor, A. Lima, J. Pastor, J.D. Yount & R.J. Naiman, 1990. Overview of case studies on recovery of aquatic systems from disturbance. Environ. Manage. 14: 571–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oliver, I. & A.J. Beattie, 1996. Designing a cost-effective invertebrate survey: a test of methods for rapid assessment of biodiversity. Ecol. Appl. 6: 594–607.Google Scholar
  51. Olsgard, F., P.J. Somerfield & M.R. Carr, 1997. Relationships between taxonomic resolution and data transformations in analyses of a macrobenthic community along an established pollution gradient. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 149: 173–181.Google Scholar
  52. Osgood, D.T. & J.C. Zieman, 1993. Factors controlling aboveground Spartina alterniflora(smooth cordgrass) tissue element composition and production in different age barrier island marshes. Estuaries 16: 815–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Otway, N.M., 1995. Assessing impacts of deepwater sewage disposal: a case study from New South Wales, Australia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 31: 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pickett, S.T.A. & P.S. White, 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
  55. Piehler, M.F., C.A. Currin, R. Cassanova & H.W. Paerl, 1998. Development & N-2-fixing activity of the benthic microbial community in transplanted Spartina alternifloramarshes in North Carolina. Restor. Ecol. 6: 290–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Race, M.S., 1985. Critique of present wetlands mitigation policies in the United States based on an analysis of past restoration projects in San Francisco Bay. Environ. Manage. 9: 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Race, M.S. & M.S. Fonesca, 1996. Fixing compensatory mitigation: what will it take? Ecol. Appl. 6: 94–101.Google Scholar
  58. Resh, V.H., A.V. Brown, A.P. Covich, M.E. Gurtz, H.W. Li, G.W. Minshall, S.R. Reice, A.L. Sheldon, J.B. Wallace & R.C. Wissmar, 1988. The role of disturbance in stream ecology. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc. 7: 433–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Roberts, D.E., A. Smith, P. Ajani & A.R. Davis, 1998. Rapid changes in encrusting marine assemblages exposed to anthropogenic point-source pollution: a ‘Beyond-BACI’ approach. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 163: 213–224.Google Scholar
  60. Roughgarden, J., S. Gaines & H. Possingham, 1988. Recruitment dynamics in complex life cycles. Science 214: 1460–1466.Google Scholar
  61. Seneca, E.D., S.W. Broome, W.W. Woodhouse & L.M. Cammen, 1976. Establishing Spartina alternifloramarsh in North Carolina. Environ. Conserv. 3: 185–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Simenstad, C.A. & R.M. Thom, 1996. Functional equivalency trajectories of the restored Gog-Le-Hi-Te estuarine wetland. Ecol. Appl. 6: 38–56.Google Scholar
  63. Smith, S.D.A. & R.D. Simpson, 1993. Effects of pollution on holdfast macrofauna of the kelp Ecklonia radiata: discrimination at different taxonomic levels. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 96: 199–208.Google Scholar
  64. Somerfield, P.J. & K.R. Clarke, 1995. Taxonomic levels, in marine community studies, revisited. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 127: 113–119.Google Scholar
  65. Somerfield, P.J., F. Olsgard & M.R. Carr, 1997. A further examination of two new taxonomic distinctness measures. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 154: 303–306.Google Scholar
  66. Sousa, W.P., 1984. Intertidal mosaics: patch size, propagule availability, and spatially variable patterns of succession. Ecology 65: 1918–1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stebbing, A.R.D., V. Dethlefson & M. Carr (eds), 1992. Biological effects of contaminants in the North Sea: results of the ICES/IOC Bremerhaven workshop. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 91: 1–361.Google Scholar
  68. Stewart-Oaten, A., W.M. Murdoch & K.R. Parker, 1986. Environmental impact assessment: ‘pseudoreplication’ in time. Ecology 67: 929–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thompson, S.P., H.W. Paerl & C.G. Malia, 1995. Seasonal patterns of nitrification and denitrification in a natural & a restored salt marsh. Estuaries 18: 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thrush, S.F., R.D. Pridmore & J.E. Hewitt, 1994. Impacts on softsediment macrofauna: the effects of spatial variation on temporal trends. Ecol. Appl. 41: 31–41.Google Scholar
  71. Tilman, D., 1996. Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77: 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Underwood, A.J., 1981. Techniques of analysis of variance in experimental marine biology and ecology. Ann. Rev. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 19: 513–603.Google Scholar
  73. Underwood, A.J., 1991. Beyond BACI: experimental designs for detecting human environmental impacts on temporal variations in natural populations. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 42: 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Underwood, A.J., 1992. Beyond BACI: the detection of environmental impacts on populations in the real, but variable, world. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 161: 145–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Underwood, A.J., 1993. The mechanics of spatially replicated sampling programmes to detect environmental impacts in a variable world. Aust. J. Ecol. 18: 99–116.Google Scholar
  76. Underwood, A.J., 1994a. On beyond BACI: sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances. Ecol. Appl. 4: 3–15.Google Scholar
  77. Underwood, A.J., 1994b. Spatial & temporal problems with monitoring. In: P. Calow & G.E. Petts (eds), The Rivers Handbook. Volume 2. Blackwell Scientific Publications: 101–123.Google Scholar
  78. Underwood, A.J., 1996. Detection, interpretation, prediction and management of environmental disturbances: some roles for experimental marine ecology. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 200: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Underwood, A.J., 1997. Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  80. Underwood, A.J. & M.G. Chapman, 1996a. Scales of spatial patterns of distribution of intertidal invertebrates. Oecologia (Berl.) 107: 212–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Underwood, A.J. & M.G. Chapman, 1996b. Subtidal assemblages on rocky reefs at a cliff-face sewage outfall (North Head, Sydney, Australia): what happened when the outfall was turned off? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 33: 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Underwood, A.J. & M.G. Chapman, 1998. A method for analysing spatial scales in variation in composition of assemblages. Oecologia (Berl.) 117: 570–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Underwood, A.J. & M.G. Chapman, 1999. Conservation of coastal organisms depends on scientific realism, not community ‘monitoring’. Australian Zoologist (in press).Google Scholar
  84. Underwood, A.J., E.J. Denley & M.J. Moran, 1983. Experimental analyses of the structure and dynamics of the midshore intertidal communities in New South Wales. Oecologia (Berl.) 56: 202–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Underwood, A.J. & P.G. Fairweather, 1989. Supply-side ecology and benthic marine assemblages. TREE 4: 16–20.Google Scholar
  86. Vivian Smith, G., 1997. Microtopographic heterogeneity and floristic diversity in experimental wetland communities. J. Ecol. 85: 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Warwick, R.M., 1986. A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthic communities. Mar. Biol. 92: 557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Warwick, R.M., 1988. Analysis of community attributes of the macrobenthos of Frierfjord/Langesundsfjord at taxonomic levels higher than species. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 46: 167–170.Google Scholar
  89. Warwick, R.M., M.R. Carr, K.R. Clarke, J.M. Gee & R.H. Green, 1988. A mesocosm experiment on the effects of hydrocarbon and copper pollution on a sublittoral soft-sediment meiobenthic community. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 46: 181–191.Google Scholar
  90. Warwick, R.M. & K.R. Clarke, 1993. Increased variability as a symptom of stress in marine communities. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 172: 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Warwick, R.M. & K.R. Clarke, 1994. Relearning the ABC: taxonomic changes and abundance/biomass relationships in disturbed benthic communities. Mar. Biol. 118: 739–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Warwick, R.M. & K.R. Clarke, 1995. New ‘biodiversity’ measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 129: 301–305.Google Scholar
  93. Warwick, R.M., K.R. Clarke & Suharsono, 1990. A statistical analysis of coral community responses to the 1982–1983 El Niño in the Thousand Islands, Indonesia. Coral Reefs 8: 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zedler, J.B., 1996a. Ecological issues in wetland mitigation: an introduction to the forum. Ecol. Appl. 6: 33–37.Google Scholar
  95. Zedler, J.B., 1996b. Coastal mitigation in southern California: the need for a regional restoration strategy. Ecol. Appl. 6: 84–93.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • M.G. Chapman
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Research on Ecological Impacts of Coastal Cities, Marine Ecological Laboratories A11University of SydneyNSWAustralia

Personalised recommendations