This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
NOTES AND REFERENCES
Sieber J. Empirical study of ethical issues in psychological research. In: Stanley, B. et al. (eds.) 1996: 27.
Wade C. and Tavris C. Psychology. New York: Harper & Row, 1987: 70.
Vinacke WE. Deceiving experimental subjects. American Psychologist 1954; 9: 155.
Saks M. and Melton G. Is it possible to legislate morality? Encouraging psychological research contributions to problems of research ethics. In: Stanley B. et al. (eds.), 1996: 230.
Korn J, 1997: 9.
Elms A. Keeping deception honest. In: Beauchamp, T. L. et al. (eds.) Ethical Issues in Social Science Research. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982: 237.
Christensen L. Deception in psychological research: When is its use justified? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1988; 14: 670. Cf. Fisher CB and Fyrberg D. College students weigh the costs and benefits of deceptive research. American Psychologist 1994; 49: 1#x2013;11. See also Stanley B. and Guido J. Informed consent: Psychological and empirical issues. In: Stanley B. et al. (eds.), 1996.
Kimmel AJ. Ethical Issues in Behavioral Research: A Survey. New York: Blackwell, 1996: 82–83.
Smith MB. Some perspectives on ethical/political issues in social-science research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1976; 2: 447.
Greenberg J and Folger R. Controversial Issues in Social Research Methods. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988: 144.
Kimmel AJ. Ethics and human subjects research: A delicate balance. American Psychologist 1979; 34: 634.
Milgram S. Issues in the study of obedience: A reply to Baumrind. American Psychologist 1964; 19: 848–852.
On the more empirical puzzles surrounding the deception-debriefing package, see Harris B. Key words: A history of debriefing in social psychology. In: Morawski J. G. (ed.) The Rise of Experimentation in American Psychology. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988.
Thompson WC. Research on human judgment and decision making: Implications for informed consent and institutional review. In: Stanley B. et al. (eds.), 1996: 42.
Sieber JE, Iannuzzo R, and Rodriguez B. Deception methods in psychology: Have they changed in 25 years? Ethics and Behavior 1995; 5: 75.
Zaner RM. Ethics and the Clinical Encounter. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1988.
See, e.g., Danziger K. Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990; and Schultz DP. The human subject in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin 1969; 72: 214#x2013;228.
Some examples of this work are Adair JG. The meaning of the situation to subjects. American Psychologist 1982; 37: 1406–1408; Gergen KJ. Toward Transformation in Social Knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982; and Rosnow RL. Paradigms in Transition: The Methodology of Social Inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herrera, C.D. Research Ethics at the Empirical Side. Theor Med Bioeth 20, 191–200 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009983711120
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009983711120