Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Normativity, Guardianship, and the Elderly

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of guardianship, its associated principles, distinctions, and articulation of the legal needs of the elderly are introduced via a review of well-canvassed criticisms of Canadian guardianship legislation. Claims that the reformed legislation of Alberta, Quebec, and British Columbia represent models of adequate adult guardianship compared with traditional (archaic lunacy) law are examined. This paper argues that these renovated models exhibit a dubious normative advance over traditional legislation. Specifically, the normative presuppositions of the reformed legislation, such as, restriction to an autonomy-paternalism framework, and the norms of the liberal individual and state, obscure important issues in at least two key areas which challenge the models' assumptions; namely, assessment and legal competence and assessment and need. The development of guardianship laws and of social arrangements that are more responsive to the life experiences of the elderly requires critical re-articulation of the nature of individuals and their communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Carney T, Tait D. Guardianship Dilemmas and Care of the Aged, Sydney Law Review 1991; 13(1): 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosoff AJ, Gottlieb GL. Preserving Personal Autonomy for the Elderly: Competency, Guardianship, and Alzheimer's Disease, The Journal of Legal Medicine 1987; 8(1): 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hughes ME. Personal Guardianship in the Elderly in Canadian Common Law Provinces: An Overview of the Law and Charter Implications. In: Hughes ME, Pask DE, eds. National Themes in Family Law. Toronto: Carswell, 1988: 138–156.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robertson G. Mental Disability and the Law in Canada. Toronto: Carswell, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Savage H, McKague C. Mental Health Law in Canada. Toronto: Butterworths, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McLaughlin P. Guardianship of the Person. Downsview, Ontario: National Institute on Mental Retardation, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carney T. Civil and Social Guardianship for Intellectually Handicapped People, Monash University Law Review 1982; 8: 199–232.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon RM, Verdun-Jones SN, MacDougall DJ. Standing in Their Shoes: Guardianship, Trusteeship and the Elderly Canadian. “unpublished manuscript”.

  9. Gordon RM, Verdun-Jones SN. Reforms in the Field of Adult Guardianship Law: A Comment on Recent Developments, Canadian Journal of Family Law 1987; 6: 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thorton JE, MacDougall DJ. Legal Services for an Aging Population. 1990

  11. Ontario. Mental Incompetency Act, R.S.O., c. 264 1980.

  12. Ontario. Mental Health Act, R.S.O., c. 262 1980.

  13. Baker D. The Ontario Incompetency Act, Health Law in Canada 1983; 2: 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carney T. The Limits and the Social Legacy of Guardianship in Australia, Federal Law Review 1989; 18: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carney T. Guardianship Boards in Australia: Accessible and Accountable Justice? In: Verdun-Jones SN, Layton M, eds. Mental Health Law Through the Life Cycle. Burnaby, BC.: Simon Fraser University, 1994: 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Winninger D, Pineau L. Incapacity and Autonomy: Striking a Balance, Health Law in Canada 1995; 15(3): 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sommerville MA. Labels versus Contents: Variance between Philosophy, Psychiatry and Law in Concepts Governing Decision-Making, McGill Law Journal 1994; 39: 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alberta. Dependent Adults Act, R.S.A., c. D-32 1980.

  19. Carney T, Singer P. Ethical and Legal Issues in Guardianship Options for Intellectually Disadvantaged People. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Christie JR. 1984. Guardianship in Alberta, Canada. In: Apolloni T, Cooke T, eds. A New Look at Guardianship: Protective Services That Support Personalized Living. Baltimore: Paul Brookes Publishing Company, 1984: 183–221.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Quebec. Public Curator Act, S.Q., c. 54 1989.

  22. British Columbia. Adult Guardianship Act, S.B.C., 35 1993.

  23. British Columbia. How Can We Help?: A Discussion Paper. The Report of the Joint Working Committee of the Project to Review Adult Guardianship in British Columbia, 1992.

  24. Gordon RM, Verdun-Jones SN. Adult Guardianship in Canada. Scarborough: Carswell, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marlett, Nancy. The Determination of Personal Competence: Important Considerations for Parents, Service Providers, and Professionals. In: Apolloni T, Cooke T, eds. A New Look at Guardianship: Protective Services That Support Personalized Living, Baltimore: Paul Brookes Publishing Company, 1984: 87–114.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pepper-Smith R, Harvey W, Silberfeld M. Competence and Practical Judgment, Theoretical Medicine 1996; 17(2): 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Landry L. Culture, Consensus and Competence Assessment, “unpublished manuscript”.

  28. Loewy RS. A Critique of Traditional Relationship Models, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1994; 3: 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Van McCrary, S, Walman AT. Procedural Paternalism in Competency Determination, Law, Medicine and Health Care 1990; 18(1–2): 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bursztajn, Harold. More Law and Less Protection: “Critogenesis,” “Legal Iatrogenesis,” and Medical Decision Making, Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 1985; 18(2): 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Matsuda M. Liberal Jurisprudence and Abstracted Visions of Human Nature, New Mexico Law Review 1986; 16: 613–630.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Minow M. Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Poole R. Reason, Self-Interest and “Commercial Society”: The Social Content of Kantian Morality, Critical Philosophy 1984; 1: 24–46.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Poole R. Modernity, Rationality and “the Masculine.” In: Threadgold T, Cranny-Francis A, eds. Feminine/Masculine and Representation. Sydney: George Allen and Unwin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Plumwood, Val. Nature, Self, and Gender: Feminism, Environmental Philosophy, and the Critique of Rationalism, Hypatia 1991; 6(1): 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pepper-Smith R. Competence and the Unity of the Self, “unpublished manuscript”.

  37. Pepper-Smith R. The Meaning of Personal Competence, “unpublished manuscript”.

  38. Benner P, Gordon S. Caring Practice. In: Gordon S, Benner P, Noddings N, eds. Caregiving: Readings in Knowledge, Practice, Ethics, and Politics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996: 40–55.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Townsend P. The Structured Dependency of the Elderly: A Creation of Social Policy in the Twentieth Century. In: Crawford J, ed. Canadian Gerontological Collection III: The Family of Later Life. Canadian Association on Gerontology, 1981: 34–75.

  40. Marshall V. Social Perspectives on Aging: Theoretical Notes. In: Marshal V, ed. Aging in Canada: Social Perspectives. Markham, Ontario: Fitzhenry and Whiteside, 1987: 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kuczewski M. Fragmentation and Consensus: Communitarian and Casuist Bioethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pepper-Smith R, Harvey W. Competency Assessments in Discharge Planning and the Question of Intergenerational Justice. Westminster Affairs 1990; 3: 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mairs B. Helping Seniors Mobilize: A Handbook on Community Organizing. Toronto: Lawrence Heights Community Health Centre Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Marshall D. Silver Threads: Critical Reflections on Growing Old. Toronto: Between the Line Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Harvey W, Pepper-Smith R, Landry L. Competence in the Elderly, Focus on Aging 1992; 13(2): 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Frolik LA, Barnes AP. Elderlaw: Cases and Materials. Charlottesville, VA.: The Michie Company, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kritzer HM, Dicks HM. Adult Guardianships in Wisconsin: An Empirical Assessment. Madison, WI.: The Center for Public Representation and Elder Law Center, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Philosophy Department, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA

    Lorraine Y. Landry

Authors
  1. Lorraine Y. Landry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Landry, L.Y. Normativity, Guardianship, and the Elderly. Theor Med Bioeth 20, 69–84 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009980009102

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009980009102

Search

Navigation