Skip to main content
Log in

Boards of Directors as Strategists in an Enacted World – The Danish Case

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We argue that Boards of Directors of Danish companieshave been socially constructed as an importantdecision making body in the companies. Since 1974,employees have elected members to the Board ofDirectors. Today they can elect one third of the Boardmembers. In spite of this new composition of theBoard, it has emerged as a team that has been able toconvince the stakeholders, the press, and the publicabout its important standing in the management of thecompany.

To understand this development we look at fourdifferent perspectives. (1) The changing businessenvironment that has framed the development:globalization, mergers and acquisitions, increasedcompetition, technological innovations, strategicalliances, political consumers, and ethical issues are factors that have been the motor for this change. (2)We use a radical social psychological version ofleadership theory (Meindl, 1993) to understand thesocial construction of the change of the role of theBoard of Directors that has occurred. We argue thatthe stakeholders and the society at large haveascribed importance and leadership to the Board, andthat it plays an important role as strategist in thecompanies. (3) We see the board as a theater ensemblestaging a performance for the audience (stakeholdersand the wider environment) using Erving Goffman's``Presentation of Self in Everyday Life'' (1959) as atheoretical point of departure. From this point ofview, the role of the Board is to socialize newmembers, to maintain its unity, and to successfullyplay the role of strategists. (4) To understandstrategists you may understand the company and itsenvironment in either realist terms (objectiveenvironments) or in social constructivist terms(enacted environments) (Smircich and Stubbart, 1985). We adopt the enactment position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baysinger, B. and R.E. Hoskinsson: 1990, "The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy", Academy of Management Review 15: 72–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and T. Luckmann: 1966, The Social Construction of Reality (N.Y.: Doubleday).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A.A. and G.C. Means: 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (N.Y.: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, S. and K. Kreiner: 1991, Projektledelse i løst koblede systemer, ledelse og læring i en ufuldkommen verden (Project Leadership in Loosely Coupled Systems: Leadership and Learning in an Imperfect World) (Copenhagen: Jurist-og Økonomforbundets Forlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, S. and A. Westenholz: 1997, "The Social/Behavioral Construction of Employees as Strategic Actors on Company Boards of Directors", American Behavioral Science 40(4): 490–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, S. and A. Westenholz: 1999a, Medarbejdervalgte i danske virksomheder-fra lønarbejder til borger i virksomhedssamfundet (Elected Employees in Danish Companies: From Wage-Earners to Citizens in the Business Community) (Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, S. and A. Westenholz, A.: 1999b, The Social Construction of Collective Actors. Paper Presented at the American Sociological Association meeting in Chicago, USA, August.

  • Christensen, S. and A. Westenholz: 1999c, "Collective Decision Making-Towards a Relational Perspective", American Behavioral Scientist (forthcoming).

  • Cowen, S. and R. Osborne: 1995, "Bestyrelsen som strategisk redskab (The Board of Directors as a Strategic Tool)", Ledelse I Dag 4: 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M. and J.G. March: 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Demb, A. and F-F. Neubauer: 1992, "The Corporate Board: Confronting the Paradoxes", Long Range Planning 25: 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H.: 1983, "The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm", Journal of Law and Economics 26: 375–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J. and W.W. Powell: 1983, "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields", American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.: 1985, "Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches", Management Science 2: 134–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M.: 1997, "Manifesto for a Relational Sociology", American Journal of Sociology 103(2): 281–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. and M. Jensen: 1983, "Separation of Ownership and Control", Journal of Law and Economics (June) 26: 301–325.

  • Forbes, D.P. and F.J. Milliken: 1999, "Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups", Academy of Management Review 24(3): 489–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R. and R.R. Alford: 1991, "Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions", in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K.J.: 1994, Realities and Relations-Soundings in Social Constructivism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.: 1959, The Presentation of self in Everyday Life (New York: Doubleday Anchor Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J. et al.: 1994, "The Effects on Board Size and Diversity on Strategic Change", Strategic Management Journal 15: 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M.J.: 1997, "Irony and the Social Construction of Contradiction in the Humor of a Management Team", Organization Science (May-June) 8(3): 275–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. and S. Snell: 1988, "External Control, Corporate Strategy, and Firm Performance in Research-Intensive Industries", Strategic Management Journal 9: 577–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. and W.C. Meckling: 1976, "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Analysis 3: 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., R. Daily and A. Ellstrand: 1996, "Board of Directors: A Review and Research-Agenda", Journal of Management 22: 409–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonnergård, K. and C. Svensson: 1993, "What Boards Think and How they Behave", Working Paper(Lund University).

  • Kerr, J.L. and Bettis: 1987, "Boards of Directors, Top Management Compensation, and Shareholder Returns", Academy of Management Journal 30: 645–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langebæk, S.: 1991, Bestyrelsens idegrundlag og funktion (The Idea and Functioning of the Board of Directors) (Copenhagen, Gad).

  • Lindblom, C.E.: 1959, "The Science of Muddling Through", Public Administrative Review (Spring) XIX.

  • Lorsch. J.W. and E. MacIver: 1989, Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards(Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G.: 1991, "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning", Organization Science 2: 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen: 1989, Rediscovering Institutions-The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and H.A. Simon: 1958, Organizations (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, T. and A. Pettigrew: 1999, "Strategist on the Board", Organization Studies 20(1): 47–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, James R.: 1993, "Reinventing Leadership: A Radical, Social Psychological Approach", in J.K. Murnighan (ed.), Social Psychology in Organizations. Advances in Theory and Research. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall), pp. 89–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and W.R. Scott: 1992, Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality, Updated Edition (California: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M.: 1983, "Who Controls Whom? An Examination of the Relation Between Management and Boards of Directors in Large American Corporations", Academy of Management Review 8: 426–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and S.G. Winter: 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B.: 1988, "Agency and Transaction Cost Perspectives on the Manager-Shareholder Relationship: Incentives for Congruent Interests", Academy of Management Review 13: 214–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. and S. Zahra: 1992, "Board Composition from a Strategic Contingency Perspective", Journal of Management Studies 29.

  • Pfeffer, J.: 1972, "Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment", Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 218–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R.: 1995, Institutions and Organizations (Thousand Oaks: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulley, J.: 1987, Odyssey-Pepsi to Apple...A Journey of Adventure, Ideas, and the Future (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: 1957, Models of Man (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, L. and C. Stubbart: 1985, "Strategic Management in an Enacted World", Academy of Management Review 10(4): 724–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E.: 1993, "Sense-Making in Organizations: Small Structures with Large Consequences", in J.K. Murnighan (ed.), Social Psychology in Organizations. Advances in Theory and Research(Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E.: 1995, Sense-making in Organizations (Thousand Oaks: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christensen, S., Westenholz, A. Boards of Directors as Strategists in an Enacted World – The Danish Case. Journal of Management & Governance 3, 261–286 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009977806089

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009977806089

Navigation