Skip to main content
Log in

Random Features of the Fatigue Limit

  • Published:
Extremes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The classical fatigue limit is often an important characteristic in fatigue design regarding metallic material. The limit is usually obtained from a staircase test in combination with some assumption about the statistical distribution of the limit. This distribution can be of a normal, log-normal or of extreme value type and no particular physical argument gives favor to any specific distribution. This leads to a certain ambiguity in the evaluation of test results which forces the designer to introduce large safety factors. In order to find a physically based statistical distribution for use in staircase tests to determine the fatigue limit we present here a random model for the fatigue limit based on the following assumptions; (i) The square root area model according to Murakami and co-workers is valid, (ii) the randomness in the fatigue limit is induced by the randomness of the maximum defect size, (iii) the random maximum defect size has an extreme value distribution of Gumbel type. This leads to the fatigue limit distribution based on Gumbel (FLG), which is recommended to replace the normal distribution in the evaluation of staircase fatigue tests in case of hard materials. It turns out that the skewness of the resulting distribution depends on the coefficient of variation; with a normal-like non-skewed distribution at the coefficient of variation of five percent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dixon, W.J. and Mood, A.M., “A method for obtaining and analyzing sensitivity data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 43, 109–126, (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Little, R.E. and Jebe, E.H., Statistical design of fatigue experiments, Applied Science Publishers, Glasgow, UK, (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Svensson, T., “Experimental determination of the fatigue limit,” NT Techn. Report 344, Nordtest, Espoo, Finland, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kjaer, M., “Estimation of fractiles in the fatigue limit distribution”, (in Swedish), Master Thesis, Division of Mathematical Statistics, Department of Mathematics, Chalmers Institute of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miller, K., “The three thresholds for fatigue crack propagation, Fatigue and fracture mechanics,” 27th Volume, ASTM STP 1296, (Piascik, Newman, Dowling eds.), American Society for Testing and Materials, 267–286, (1997).

  6. Murakami, Y. and Endo, M., “Effects of defects, inclusions and inhomogenities on fatigue strength,” International Journal of Fatigue 16, 163–182, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson, C., “The largest inclusions within a piece of steel,” Extremes-Risk and Safety, workshop held in Gothenburg, August 18-22, (1998).

  8. Beretta, S. and Murakami, Y., “Statistical analysis of defects for fatigue strength production and quality control of materials,” Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures 21, 1049–1065, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Little, R.E., “Tables for estimating median fatigue limits” ASTM STP 731, American Society for Testing and Materials, (1981).

  10. Leadbetter, M.R., Lindgren, G., and Rootzén H., Extremes and Related Properties of Random Sequences and Processes, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1983).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Svensson, T., de Mare´, J. Random Features of the Fatigue Limit. Extremes 2, 165–176 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009970903532

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009970903532

Navigation