Abstract
The classical fatigue limit is often an important characteristic in fatigue design regarding metallic material. The limit is usually obtained from a staircase test in combination with some assumption about the statistical distribution of the limit. This distribution can be of a normal, log-normal or of extreme value type and no particular physical argument gives favor to any specific distribution. This leads to a certain ambiguity in the evaluation of test results which forces the designer to introduce large safety factors. In order to find a physically based statistical distribution for use in staircase tests to determine the fatigue limit we present here a random model for the fatigue limit based on the following assumptions; (i) The square root area model according to Murakami and co-workers is valid, (ii) the randomness in the fatigue limit is induced by the randomness of the maximum defect size, (iii) the random maximum defect size has an extreme value distribution of Gumbel type. This leads to the fatigue limit distribution based on Gumbel (FLG), which is recommended to replace the normal distribution in the evaluation of staircase fatigue tests in case of hard materials. It turns out that the skewness of the resulting distribution depends on the coefficient of variation; with a normal-like non-skewed distribution at the coefficient of variation of five percent.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dixon, W.J. and Mood, A.M., “A method for obtaining and analyzing sensitivity data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 43, 109–126, (1948).
Little, R.E. and Jebe, E.H., Statistical design of fatigue experiments, Applied Science Publishers, Glasgow, UK, (1975).
Svensson, T., “Experimental determination of the fatigue limit,” NT Techn. Report 344, Nordtest, Espoo, Finland, (1996).
Kjaer, M., “Estimation of fractiles in the fatigue limit distribution”, (in Swedish), Master Thesis, Division of Mathematical Statistics, Department of Mathematics, Chalmers Institute of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, (1997).
Miller, K., “The three thresholds for fatigue crack propagation, Fatigue and fracture mechanics,” 27th Volume, ASTM STP 1296, (Piascik, Newman, Dowling eds.), American Society for Testing and Materials, 267–286, (1997).
Murakami, Y. and Endo, M., “Effects of defects, inclusions and inhomogenities on fatigue strength,” International Journal of Fatigue 16, 163–182, (1994).
Anderson, C., “The largest inclusions within a piece of steel,” Extremes-Risk and Safety, workshop held in Gothenburg, August 18-22, (1998).
Beretta, S. and Murakami, Y., “Statistical analysis of defects for fatigue strength production and quality control of materials,” Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures 21, 1049–1065, (1998).
Little, R.E., “Tables for estimating median fatigue limits” ASTM STP 731, American Society for Testing and Materials, (1981).
Leadbetter, M.R., Lindgren, G., and Rootzén H., Extremes and Related Properties of Random Sequences and Processes, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1983).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Svensson, T., de Mare´, J. Random Features of the Fatigue Limit. Extremes 2, 165–176 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009970903532
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009970903532