Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the oil degradation potential of endogenous micro‐organisms in tropical marine wetlands

  • Published:
Mangroves and Salt Marshes

Abstract

As part of a larger study on the bioremediation of oil spills in tropical mangrove habitats, we conducted a series of flask experiments to test for the presence of hydrocarbon degrading micro‐organisms in representative wetland habitats. Also tested was the biodegradation of selected oils (Gippsland Crude, Arabian Light Crude and Bunker C), that are transported along the Australian coast. We also tested for potential inhibition of biodegradation by natural organics in the mangrove pore waters and evaluated the ability of an oxygen release compound (ORC) to stimulate biodegradative processes. Evaporation was a significant factor in removing the light alkane and aromatic hydrocarbons from air and nitrogen sparged flasks. Evaporation removed ∼27% of the Gippsland, ∼37%of the Arabian, and ∼10% of the Bunker oils. Oxygen was necessary to support biodegradation as expected. The micro‐organisms were capable of biodegrading the non‐volatile saturate fraction of each oil. Degradation removed another 14 of the Gippsland, 30 of the Arabian, and 22 of the Bunker C oils. Normalisation of the individual aromatic hydrocarbon classes to internal triterpane biomarkers indicated some degradation of aromatics in the Arabian Light and Bunker C oils. Although alkane degradation rates were comparable in the three oils, the Gippsland oil had a higher wax content and after 14 days incubation, still contained as much as 25 of the alkanes present in the original oil. Thus, degradation of its aromatic fraction may have been delayed. Based on these results we estimate that Arabian Light Crude oil would have a shorter residence time than the other oils in mangrove sediment. It has a higher content of light hydrocarbons, which are readily removed by both physical and microbial processes. The Bunker C would be expected to have the longest residence time in mangrove sediment, because it contains a larger percentage of higher molecular weight, unresolved components. Comparison of the efficiency of inoculates from three tropical intertidal habitats (Avicennia and Rhizophora mangroves, plus salt marsh sediments) indicated the presence of hydrocarbon degrading micro‐organisms in all three habitats. There was no known history of oil contamination in the soil source area. There was no inhibition of degradation due to addition of mangrove pore waters. The ORC did not facilitate degradation in closed laboratory experiments. These results were used to formulate a bioremediation strategy to treat oiled sediments in mangrove forests in Queensland Australia, which was based on forced aeration and nutrient addition.

Evaporation was a significant factor in removing the light alkane and aromatic hydrocarbons from air and nitrogen sparged flasks. Evaporation removed ∼27% of the Gippsland, ∼37% of the Arabian, and ∼10% of the Bunker oils. Oxygen was necessary to support biodegradation as expected. The micro-organisms were capable of biodegrading the non-volatile saturate fraction of each oil. Degradation removed another 14% of the Gippsland, 30% of the Arabian, and 22% of the Bunker C oils. Normalisation of the individual aromatic hydrocarbon classes to internal triterpane biomarkers indicated some degradation of aromatics in the Arabian Light and Bunker C oils. Although alkane degradation rates were comparable in the three oils, the Gippsland oil had a higher wax content and after 14 days incubation, still contained as much as 25% of the alkanes present in the original oil. Thus, degradation of its aromatic fraction may have been delayed. Based on these results we estimate that Arabian Light Crude oil would have a shorter residence time than the other oils in mangrove sediment. It has a higher content of light hydrocarbons, which are readily removed by both physical and microbial processes. The Bunker C would be expected to have the longest residence time in mangrove sediment, because it contains a larger percentage of higher molecular weight, unresolved components. Comparison of the efficiency of inoculates from three tropical intertidal habitats (Avicennia and Rhizophora mangroves, plus salt marsh sediments) indicated the presence of hydrocarbon degrading micro-organisms in all three habitats. There was no known history of oil contamination in the soil source area. There was no inhibition of degradation due to addition of mangrove pore waters. The ORC did not facilitate degradation in closed laboratory experiments.

These results were used to formulate a bioremediation strategy to treat oiled sediments in mangrove forests in Queensland Australia, which was based on forced aeration and nutrient addition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atlas, R.M. 1995. Petroleum biodegradation and oil spill bioremediation. Marine Pollution Bulletin 31: 178–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bence, A.E., Kvenolden, K.A. and Kennicutt, M.C. 1996. Organic geochemistry applied to environmental assessments of PrinceWilliam Sound, Alaska, after the ExxonValdez oil spill: a review. Organic Geochemistry 24(1): 7–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, M., Ehrhardt, M. and Jones, J.H. 1973. The environmental fate of stranded crude oil. Deep-Sea Research 20: 239–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budinski, H., Raymond, N., Nadalig, T., Gilewicz, M., Garrigues, P., Bertrand, J.C. and Caumette, P. 1998. Aerobic biodegradation of alkylated aromatic hydrocarbons by a bacterial community. Organic Geochemistry 28(5): 337–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, K.A. and Codi, S. 1998. Contrasting impacts of localised versus catastrophic oil spills in mangrove sediments. Mangroves and Salt Marshes 2: 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, K.A., Garrity, S. and Levings, S. 1993. How many years before mangrove ecosystems recover from catastrophic oil spill? Marine Pollution Bulletin 26: 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, K.A. Garrity, S., Jorissen, D., MacPherson, J., Stoelting, M., Tierney, J. and Yelle-Simmons, L. 1994. The Galeta Oil Spill II. Unexpected persistence of oil trapped in mangrove sediments. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 38: 349–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E.J. and Braddock, J.F. 1990. Sheen screen: a miniaturised most-probable-number method for the enumeration of oil-degrading micro-organisms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56: 3895–3896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corredor, J.E., Morell, J.M. and del Castillo, C.E. 1990. Persistence of spilled crude oil in a tropical intertidal environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 21: 385–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N.C. 1992. Mangrove floristics and biogeography. pp. 63–100. In: Robertson, A.I. and Alongi, D.M. (eds), Tropical Mangrove Ecosystems. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayad, N.M. and Overton, E. 1995. A unique biodegradation pattern of the oil spilled during the 1991 Gulf War. Marine Pollution Bulletin 30: 239–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusey, P. and Oudot, J. 1984. Relative influence of physical removal and biodegradation in the depuration of petroleum contaminated seashore sediments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 15(4): 136–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, C.F. 1977. Rate measurements and the rate-limiting factors in oil biodegradation in the marine environment. Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer. 171: 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, C.F. and Bavor, J. 1981. Degradation rates of crude oil in a low nutrient marine environment. Technical Report No. 29. Ministry for Conservation, Fisheries & Wildlife Dvsn. State of Victoria, Australia, 30 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, F., Stora, G. and Bertrand, J.-C. 1996. In situ bioturbation and hydrocarbon fate in an experimental contaminated Mediterranean coastal ecosystem. Chemosphere 33: 1449–1458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundlach, E.R. and Hayes, M.O. 1978. Vulnerability of coastal environments to oil spill impacts. Marine Technology Society Journal 12: 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtom G.J, Swannell, R.P.J., Mitchell, D.J., Duke, N.C. and Burns, K.A. 1996. The use of bioremediation in salt marshes and mangroves: a review. Unpublished Report, National Environmental Technology Centre, AEA Technology, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX14 3DB, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, B.D. and Jackson, J.B.C. (eds) 1993. Long-term assessment of the oil spill at Bahia las Minas, (Panama). Final Report. OCS Study MMS 93–0048. US Dept. of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico Regional Office, New Orleans, La. (2 Technical Volumes plus Executive Summary.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C.T. and Burns, K.A. 1977. Long term effects of an oil spill on populations of the salt marsh crab, Uca pugnax. Science 197: 484–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Marlin, F.X., Swannell, R.P.J., Reilly, T., Sveum, P., Oudot, J., Guillerme, M., Ducreux, J. and Chaumery, C. 1995. A protocol for experimental assessments of bioremediation strategies on shorelines. Proceedings of the 1995 Oil Spill Conference, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C., pp. 901–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levings, S., Garrity, S. and Burns, K.A. 1994. The Galeta Oil Spill III. Chronic reoiling and long term toxicity of hydrocarbon residues in the mangrove fringe community. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 38: 365–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, K. and Mendolssohn, I.A. 1994. A reviewof the methods and ecological consequences of bioremediation in wetlands. Marine Response Corporation, Technical Report Series 94–004, 1–35. MSRC, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D.C. 1991. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 3rd edition. John Wiley & Sons, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC 1985. Oil in the sea: inputs, fates and effects. In: Farrington, J. (ed.), National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudot, J. 1984. Rates of microbial degradation of petroleum components as determined by computerized capillary gas chromatography and computerized mass spectrometry. Marine Environmental Research 13: 277–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudot, J. and Dutrieux, E. 1989. Hydrocarbon weathering and biodegradation in a tropical estuarine ecosystem. Marine Environmental Research 27: 195–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R.E. 1979. Introductory Statistics for Biology. 2nd edition. Edward Arnold Publ. London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, R.C. 1993. Petroleum spill bioremediation in marine environments. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 19: 217–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, S.J., Alexander, R., Kagi, R. and Jones, D.M. 1988. Microbial degradation of aromatic components of crude oils: a comparison of laboratory and field observations. Organic Geochemistry 9(4): 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, P. 1988. La regeneration de la mangrove apres un deversement accidental d'hydrocarbores; phytotoxicite et evolution physicochimique du petrole brut piege dans le substrat. These de Doctorat en Sciences. Universate Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, P. and Mille, G. 1989. Biodegradation of crude oil in an experimentally polluted peaty mangrove soil. Marine Pollution Bulletin 20(9): 430–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura, K., Ishihara, M., Shimauchi, T. and Harayama, S. 1997. Physiochemical properties and biodegradability of crude oil. Environmental Science & Technology 31: 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swannell, R.P.J. and Head, I.M. 1994. Bioremediation comes of age. Nature 168: 396–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swannell R.P.J., Tookey, D. and McDonagh, M. 1994. Bioremediation of oil spills: a state of the art review. Report LR 1008. National Environmental Technology Centre, AEA Technology, Culham, Abingdon, Oxon.OX14 3DB ISBN No. 0 85624 868 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swannell R.P.J., Croft B.C., Grant A.L. and Lee, K. 1995. Evaluation of Bioremediation Agents in Beach Microcosms. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin 2(2/3): 151–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swannell, R.P.J., Lee, K., and McDonagh, M. 1996. Field evaluations of oil spill bioremediation. Microbiology Reviews 60(2): 342–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teal, J.M., Farrington, J.W., Burns, K.A., Stegeman, J.J., Tripp, B.W., Woodin, B. and Phinney, C. 1992. The West Falmouth Oil Spill after 20 years: fate of fuel oil compounds and effects on animals. Marine Pollution Bulletin 24: 607–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/IOC/IAEA 1992. Determination of hydrocarbons in sediments. Reference Methods for Marine Pollution Monitoring No. 20. (Prepared by K.A. Burns). International Laboratory of Marine Radioactivity, Monaco MC98000. 97 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkman, J.K., Miller, G.J., Revill, A.T. and Connell, D.W. 1993. Oil Spills. Part 6. pp. 509–695. In: Environmental implications of offshore oil and gas development in Australia-the findings of an independent scientific review. Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association (APPEA) & Energy Research and Development Corporation (ERDC), Canberra, ACT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burns, K., Codi, S., Swannell, R. et al. Assessing the oil degradation potential of endogenous micro‐organisms in tropical marine wetlands. Mangroves and Salt Marshes 3, 67–84 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009968101790

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009968101790

Navigation