Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of the Similarity Model in Finite-Difference LES of Isotropic Turbulence Using a Lagrangian Dynamic Mixed Model

  • Published:
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Lagrangian dynamic formulation of the mixed similarity subgrid (SGS) model for large-eddy simulation (LES) of turbulence is proposed. In this model, averaging is performed over fluid trajectories, which makes the model applicable to complex flows without directions of statistical homogeneity. An alternative version based on a Taylor series expansion (nonlinear mixed model) is also examined. The Lagrangian models are implemented in a finite difference code and tested in forced and decaying isotropic turbulence. As comparison, the dynamic Smagorinsky model and volume-averaged formulations of the mixed models are also tested. Good results are obtained, except in the case of low-resolution LES (323) of decaying turbulence, where the similarity coefficient becomes negative due to the fact that the test-filter scale exceeds the integral scale of turbulence. At a higher resolution (643), the dynamic similarity coefficient is positive and good agreement is found between predicted and measured kinetic energy evolution. Compared to the eddy viscosity term, the similarity or the nonlinear terms contribute significantly to both SGS dissipation of kinetic energy and SGS force. In order to dynamically test the accuracy of the modeling, the error incurred in satisfying the Germano identity is evaluated. It is found that the dynamic Smagorinksy model generates a very large error, only 3% lower than the worst-case scenario without model. Addition of the similarity or nonlinear term decreases the error by up to about 50%, confirming that it represents a more realistic parameterization than the Smagorinsky model alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akhavan, R., Ansari, A., Kang, S. and Mangiavacchi, N., Subgrid-scale interactions in a numerically simulated planar turbulent jet and implications for modeling. J. Fluid Mech. (1999) submitted.

  2. Bardina, J., Improved turbulence models based on large eddy simulation of homogeneous, incompressible, turbulent flows. Ph.D. Thesis, Report TF-19:Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University (1983).

  3. Bardina, J., Ferziger, J.H. and Reynolds, W.C., Improved subgrid scale models for large eddy simulation. AIAA paper No. 80-1357 (1980).

  4. Borue, V. and Orszag, S., Local energy flux and subgrid-scale statistics in three-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 366 (1998) 1-31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cerutti, S. and Meneveau, C., Intermittency and relative scaling of the subgrid dissipation rate in turbulence. Phys. Fluids 10 (1998) 928-937.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark, R.A., Ferziger, J.H. and Reynolds, W.C., Evaluation of subgrid models using an accurately simulated turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 91 (1979) 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Comte-Bellot, G. and Corrsin, S., Simple Eulerian time correlation in full and narrow band velocity signals in grid-generated, isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 48 (1971) 273-337.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P. and Cabot, W.H., A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids A 3 (1991) 1760-1765.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ghosal, S., Lund, T.S., Moin, P. and Akselvoll, K., A dynamic localization model for large eddy simulation of turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 286 (1995) 229-255.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haworth, D.C. and Jansen, K., Large-eddy simulation on unstructured deforming meshes: towards reciprocating IC engines. In: Proceedings Summer Program 1996 Stanford University, Vol. V (1996) pp. 329-346.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Horiuti, K., A new dynamic two-parameter mixed model for large-eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 9 (1997) 3443-3464.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kravchenko, A.G. and Moin, P., On the effect of numerical errors in large eddy simulations of turbulent flows. J. Comput. Phys. 131 (1997) 310-322.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leonard, A., Large-eddy simulation of chaotic convection and beyond. AIAA Paper No. 97-020 (1997) pp. 1-8.

  14. Lesieur, M. and Métais, O., New trends in large-eddy simulations of turbulence. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 28 (1996) 45-82.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lilly, D.K., A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid scale closure method. Phys. Fluids A 4 (1992) 633-635.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, S., Meneveau, C. and Katz, J., On the properties of similarity subgrid-scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet. J. Fluid Mech. 275 (1994) 83-119.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, S., Meneveau, C. and Katz, J., Experimental study of similarity subgrid-scale models of turbulence in the far-field of a jet. Appl. Sci. Res. 54 (1995) 177-190.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meneveau, C. and Katz, J., Dynamic testing of subgrid models in LES based on the Germano identity. Phys. Fluids 11 (1999) 245-247.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meneveau, C. and Katz, J., Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy-simulation. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32 (2000) in press.

  20. Meneveau, C., Lund, T. and Cabot, W., A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 319 (1996) 353-385.

    Google Scholar 

  21. O'Neil, J. and Meneveau, C., Subgrid-scale stresses and their modeling in the turbulent plane wake. J. Fluid Mech. 349 (1997) 253-293.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Piomelli, U., High Reynolds number calculations using the dynamic subgrid-scale stress model. Phys. Fluids A 5 (1993) 1484-1490.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Piomelli, U., Yu, Y. and Adrian, R., Subgrid-scale energy transfer and near-wall turbulence structure. Phys. Fluids 8 (1996) 215-224.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Porté-Agel, F., Meneveau, C. and Parlange, M.B., A scale-dependent dynamic model for large-eddy simulation: application to the atmospheric boundary layer. Preprint (1999).

  25. Salvetti, M.V. and Banerjee, S., A-priori tests of a new dynamic subgrid-scale model for finite-difference large-eddy simulations. Phys. Fluids 7 (1995) 2831-2847.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sarghini, F., Piomelli, U. and Balaras, E., Scale-similar models for large-eddy simulations. Preprint (1998).

  27. Smagorinsky, J., General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment. Mon. Weather Rev. 91 (1963) 99-116.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vreman, B., Geurts, B. and Kuerten, H., On the formulation of the dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model. Phys. Fluids 6 (1994) 4057-4059.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vreman, B., Geurts, B. and Kuerten, H., Large eddy simulation of the turbulent mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 339 (1997) 357-390.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Winckelmans, G.S., Wray, A.A. and Vasilyev, O.V., Testing of a new mixed model for LES: the Leonard model supplemented by a dynamic Smagorinsky term. In: Proceedings Summer Program 1998 Stanford University, Vol. VII, (1998) pp. 367-388.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wu, X.H. and Squires, K.D., Large eddy simulation of an equilibrium three dimensional turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J. 35 (1997) 67-74.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zang, Y., Street, R.L. and Koseff, J., A dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model and its application to turbulent recirculating flows. Phys. Fluids A 5 (1993) 3186-3196.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zang, Y., Street, R.L. and Koseff, J., A non-staggered grid, fractional step method for time-dependent incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in curvilinear coordinates. J. Comput. Phys. 114 (1994) 18-33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, R., Meneveau, C. Effects of the Similarity Model in Finite-Difference LES of Isotropic Turbulence Using a Lagrangian Dynamic Mixed Model. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 62, 201–225 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009967228812

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009967228812

Navigation