Abstract
This paper attempts to sort out some of the current tensions and ambiguities inherent in the field of bioethics as it continues to mature. In particular it focuses on the question of the methodological relevance of theory or ethical principles to the domain of clinical ethics. I offer an approach to reasoning about moral conflict that combines the insights of contemporary moral theorists, the philosophy of American pragmatism, and the skills of rhetorical deliberation. This synthetic approach locates a proper role for moral theory in the practice of clinical ethics, thus linking abstract philosophical ideas about morality, humanity, suffering, and health to specific deeds, actions, and decisions in the concrete lives of particular individuals. The aim of this synthetic approach of bioethical inquiry is a rapprochement between theoretical knowledge in moral philosophy and the contextualized, relational, and practical understanding of what morality demands of us in our daily lives. I argue for a conception of bioethical inquiry that takes morality to be a study of certain practical, socially embedded concerns about matters of right and wrong, good and evil, as well as a study of the moral theories by which these actual concerns can be explored and critically evaluated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Jonsen A. Casuistry and clinical ethics. Theoretical Medicine 1986; 7: 65-84.
Zaner RM. Voices and time: The venture of clinical ethics. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1993; 18: 9-31.
McCullough LB. Laying clinical ethics open. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1993; 18: 1-8.
Nussbaum M. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994, p. 13.
Clousner D, Gert B. A critique of principalism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1990; 15: 219-236.
Green R, Clousner D, Gert B. The method of public morality versus the method of principalism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1993; 18: 477-489.
Richardson HS. Specifying norms as a way to resolve concrete ethical problems. Philosophy And Public Affairs 1990; 19: 279-310.
Arras JD. Getting down to cases: The revival of casuistry in bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1991; 16: 31-33.
Jonsen A, Toulmin S. The Abuse of Casuistry. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
Jonsen A. Casuistry as methodology in clinical ethics. Theoretical Medicine 1991; 12: 298-302.
Rorty R. Philosophy and The Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979, pp. 13, 313, 384.
Oakeshott M. The voice of poetry in the conversation of mankind. In Rationalism and Politics. New York: Liberty Press, 1975.
Williams B. Ethics and The Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985, p. 93.
Engelhardt HT. Bioethics and Secular Humanism, Search for a Common Morality. Philadelphia: Trinity Press International, 1991.
Lagay FL. Secular, yes, humanism, no. In Minogue B, Palmer-Fernandez G, Reagan J, eds. Reading Engelhardt: Essays on the Thought of H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. Boston: Kluwer Academic, 1997, pp. 234-258.
Toulmin S. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. New York: Macmillan, 1990.
Engelhardt HT. Pluralism and the good: Can ethics take pluralism seriously? Hastings Center Report 1989; 19: 33-35.
Baier AC. What do women want in a moral theory? Nous 1985; XIX(1) (March): 53-63.
Baier AC. Doing without moral theory? In: Baier AC, ed. Postures of The Mind. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.
Baier AC. Alternative offerings to Asclepius? Medical Humanities Review 1992; 1: 9-19.
Foot P. Moral arguments. In: Wallace G, Walker ADM, eds. The Definition of Morality. London: Methuen, 1958, pp. 174-187.
Hume D. An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding 1749. Oxford University Press, 1988, p. 25.
Nussbaum M. Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990, p. 1.
Karnos DD, Shoemaker RG, eds. Falling in Love with Wisdom: American Philosophers Talk About Their Calling. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Loewy EH. Textbook of Medical Ethics. New York and London: Plenum Medical, 1989.
Thayer HS, ed. Introduction: John Dewey. In: Pragmatism: The Classic Writings. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1982, p. 254.
Dewey J. On logic: The pattern of inquiry. In: Alston WP, Nakhnikian G, eds Readings in Twentieth Century Philosophy. London: The Free Press of Glencoe: Collier-Macmillan, 1999.
James W. What pragmatism means. In: Pragmatism and Other Essays. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1975, pp. 25, 127-128.
Dewey J. Reconstruction in Philosophy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1948.
McGee G. Pragmatic Bioethics. The Vanderbilt Library of American Philosophy: Vanderbilt University Press, 1999.
Fins JJ, Bacchetta MD, Miller FD. Clinical pragmatism: A method of moral problem solving. In: McGee G, ed. Pragmatic Bioethics. The Vanderbilt Library of American Philosophy: Vanderbilt University Press, 1999, pp. 30-44.
Aristotle. Rhetoric Book I, Chapter 2. In: McKeon R, ed. The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York, NY: Random House, 1941, 1355b, pp. 25-27.
Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics Book VI, Chapter 5. In: McKeon R, ed. The Basic Works of Aristotle. Book VI. New York, NY: Random House, 1941, 1140b, pp. 5-10.
Perelman C. The New Rhetoric and The Humanities. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1979, p. 9.
Grassi E. Rhetoric as Philosophy: The Humanist Tradition. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1980.
Ackerman TF. Medical ethics in the clinical setting: A critical review of its consultative, pedagogical and investigative methods. In: Ackerman TF, Graber GC, Reynolds CH, Thomasma DC, eds. Clinical Medical Ethics. Lanham: University Press of America, 1987, p. 146.
Todorov T. Mikhail Bakhtin: The dialogical principle trans. Wlad Godzich. In: Theory and History of Literature. 13th ed. The University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
Schön D. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Temple Smith, 1983, p. 296.
Russell B. The Problems of Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1969, pp. 153-161.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carter, M.A. A Synthetic Approach to Bioethical Inquiry. Theor Med Bioeth 21, 217–234 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009966824505
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009966824505