Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Resisting Organizational Inertia: The Evolution of Industrial Districts

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industrial district success in Italy is often explained as a function oftraditional, homogenous communities, where close social ties and communityinstitutions supposedly create the trust necessary for collaborativeinter-firm relationships among small firms. However, such a functionalistapproach fails to explain why some districts prosper over time bydeveloping new process and product innovations, while others stagnatebecause they fail to respond to rapidly changing markets. We argue thatgreater attention to firm networks – both those internal and external to the district – and the role of key firms represents a more usefulanalytical method for understanding the evolution and formation ofindustrial districts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H.: 1979, Organizations and Environments(Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A. and K. Robins: 1991, “These are not Marshallian Times”, in R. Camagni (ed.), Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives(London: Bellhaven Press), pp. 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W.: 1992, “The Network Organization in Theory and Practice”, in N. Nohria and R. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action(Boston: Harvard Business School Press), pp. 397–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balestri, A. (ed.): 1994, Terzo rapporto sul sistema economico pratese, 1993(Prato: SPRINT (Sistema Prato Innovazione Tecnologica)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroncelli, A.: 1998, “La dualite organisationnelle des enterprises d'un district industriel: Le cas du biomedical de Mirandola”, in P. Bardelli, T. Froehlicher and S. Vendemini (eds.), La metamorphose des organisations: Connivences d'acteurs, contrats et cooperations interentreprises.

  • Becattini, G.: 1979, Scienza economica e trasformazioni sociali. Florence: La Nuova Italia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, G.: 1987, Mercato e forze locali: il distretto industriale. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, G.: “Sector and/or Districts: Some Remarks on the Conceptual Foundations of Industrial Economics”, in E. Goodman and J. Bamford (eds.), Small Firms and Industrial Districts In Italy(New York: Routledge), pp. 123–136.

  • Becattini, G.: 1990, “The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Notion”, in F. Pyke et al. (eds.), Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Cooperation in Italy(Geneva: International Institute for Labor Studies), pp. 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfanti, C.M.: 1995, Cento anni di storie della Casa Rurale e Artigiana di Castelgoffredo(Mantova: Casa Rurale di Castelgoffredo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi, F.: 1987, Benetton: Information Technology in Production and Distribution: A Case Study of the Innovative Potential of Traditional Sectors, SPRU Occasional Paper (Sussex: Sussex Science Policy Research Unit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S.: 1980a, “Discontinuity in the Politics of Industrial Society”, in S. Berger and M. Piore (eds.), Dualism and Discontinuity in Industrial Societies(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 132–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S.: 1980b, “The Traditional Sector in France and Italy”, in Dualism and Discontinuity in Industrial Societies(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 88–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S.: 1981, “The Uses of the Traditional Sector in Italy: Why Declining Classes Survive”, in F. Bechhofer and B. Elliot (eds.), The Petite Bourgeoisie: Comparative Studies of the Uneasy Stratum(London: Macmillan), pp. 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, M.: 1990, The New Competition: Institutions of Industrial Restructuring(Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonicelli, E.: 1993, “La svedese Tetra Pak crede nell'Italia e sposta a Modena il centro di ricerca”, Il Sole- 24 Ore June 1, p. 18.

  • Braudel, F.: 1982, The Wheels of Commerce(New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, S.: 1982, “The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralization and Social Integration”, Cambridge Journal of Economics6: 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, S.: 1989, Piccole imprese e distretti industriali(Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, S.: 1992, “Small Firms and the Provision of Real Services”, in F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger (eds.), Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration(Geneva: International Institute for Labor Studies), pp. 177–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, S. and D. Bigarelli: 1995, “Industrial Structure and Training Needs in the Knitwear and Clothing Sectors in Italy - A Regional Analysis, 1993”, Unpublished paper available from authors, Economics Department, University of Modena.

  • Brusco, S. and M. Pezzini: 1990, “Small-Scale Enterprises in the Ideology of the Italian Left”, in F. Pyke, G. Becattini and W. Sengenberger (eds.), Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Cooperation in Italy(Geneva: International Labor Organization), pp. 142–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.: 1992, Structural Holes(Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Capecchi, V.: 1997, “In Seach of Flexibility: The Bologna Metalworking Industry, 1900 - 1992”, in C. Sabel and J. Zeitlin (eds.), Worlds of Possibilities: Flexibility and Mass Production in Western Industrialization(New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 381–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappello, S. and A. Prandi: 1973, Carpi: tradizione e sviluppo. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigognetti, L. and M. Pezzini: 1994, “Dalla lavorazione delle paglie all'industria delle maglie: la nascita del distretto industriale di Carpi”, in M. Bellandi and M. Russo (eds.), Distretti industriali e cambiamento economico locale(Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier), pp. 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.: 1990, Foundations of Social Theory(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Comune di Modena: 1996, The Enterprising City: Modena: Urban Planning and Industrial Districts(Modena: Comune di Modena).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei Ottati, G.: 1991, “The Economic Bases of Diffuse Industrialization”, International Studies of Management and Organization21(1): 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei Ottati, G.: 1994, “Prato and Its Evolution in a European Context”, in R. Leonardi and R. Nanetti (eds.), Regional Development in a Modern European Economy: The Case of Tuscany(London: Pinter), pp. 116–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei Ottati, G.: 1996, “Economic Changes in the District of Prato in the 1980s: Towards a More Conscious and Organized Industrial District”, European Planning Studies4(1): 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, G.L.: 1997, “Radici storiche dei sistemi produttivi del Veneto”, in C.M. Belfanti and T. Maccabelli (eds.), Un paradigma per i distretti industriali: radici storiche, attualita e sfide future(Brescia: Grafo), pp. 45–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forni, M.: 1987, Storie familiari e storie di proprieta: itinerari sociali nell'agricoltura italiana del dopoguerra(Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franchi, M. and V. Rieser: 1991, “Le categorie sociologiche nell'analisi del disretto industriale: tra comunita e razionalizzazione”, Stato e Mercato33: 451–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, E. and H.L. Smith: 1998, “Proximity and Complexity in the Emergence of High Technology Industry: The Oxbridge Comparison”, Geoforum29: 433–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G.: 1999, “International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel Commodity Chain”, Journal of International Economics48: 37–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, G.: 1993, “On theWeakness of Strong Ties: The Ambivalent Role of Interfirm Cooperation in the Decline and Reorganization of the Ruhr”, in G. Grabher (ed.), The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks(London: Routledge), pp. 255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.: 1973, “The Strength of Weak Ties”, American Journal of Sociology: 1360–1380.

  • Granovetter, M.: 1985, “Economic Action and Social Structures: The Problem of Embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology91: 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenzi, A.: 1997, “La storia economica e i distretti industriali marshalliani: qualche considerazione su approcci e risultati”, in C.M. Belfanti and T. Maccabelli (eds.), Un paradigma per i distretti industriali: radici storiche, attualita e sfide future(Brescia: Grafo), pp. 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B.: 1994, Lean and Mean: The Changing Landscape of Corporate Power in the Age of Flexibility(New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazerson, M.: 1988, “Organizational Growth of Small Firms: An Outcome of Markets and Hierarchies?” American Sociological Review53: 330–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazerson, M.: 1995, “A New Phoenix?: Modern Putting-Out in the Modena Knitwear Industry”, Administrative Science Quarterly40: 34–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazerson, M. and G. Lorenzoni: (forthcoming). “Changing Networks and Forms of Legal Ownership: The Restructuring of Prato's Textile Firms”.

  • Lazonick,W.: 1990, Competitive Advantage on the Shop Floor(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipparini, A.: 1995, Imprese, relazioni tra imprese e posizionamento competitivo(Milan: Etas Libri).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G.: 1979, Una politica innovativa nelle piccole medie imprese(Milan: Etas Libri).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G. and O. Ornati: 1988, “Constellation of Firms and New Ventures”, Journal of Business Venturing3: 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and S.Winter: 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change(Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paci, M.: 1980, “Struttura e funzioni della famiglia nello sviluppo industriale periferico”, in M. Paci (ed.), Famiglia e mercato del lavoro in un'economia periferica(Milan: Franco Angeli), pp. 9–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. and C. Sabel: 1984, The Second Industrial Divide(New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poni, C.: 1997, “Fashion as Flexible Production: The Strategies of the Lyons Silk Merchants in the Eighteenth Century”, in C. Sabel and J. Zeitlin (eds.), Worlds of Possibilities: Flexibility and Mass Production in Western Industrialization(New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 37–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poni, C.: 1998, “Confrontare due distretti industriali urbani: Bologna e Lyon nell'eta moderna, ” in V. Giura (ed.), Gli insediamenti economic e le loro logiche(Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane), pp. 125–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.: 1990, “Neither Market nor Hiearchy: Network Forms of Organizations”, in B. Staw and L. Cummings (eds.) (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press), pp. 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prometeia: 1991, Le politiche per l'artigianato in Emilia Romagna: Secondo rapporto dell'Osservatorio Regionale sull'Artigianato(Milan: Franco Angeli).

    Google Scholar 

  • Provincia di Modena: 1993, Tavola di concertazione sull'economia modenese: primo rapporto sulla situazione economica della provincia di Modena, giugno(Modena: Assessorato Progammazione e Pianifazione Territoriale).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.: 1993, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy(Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C.: 1995. “Turning the Page in Industrial Districts”, in A. Bagnasco and C. Sabel (eds.), Small and Medium-Size Enterprises(New York: St. Martin Press), pp. 134–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A.L.: 1994, Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128(Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, S.: 1968, “Agricultural Organization, Social Structure and Values in Italy: Amoral Familism Reconsidered”, American Anthropologist70: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solinas, G.: 1994, “Grande imprese e formazione di competenze: l'industria meccanica di Carpi”, in M. Bellandi and M. Russo (eds.), Distretti industriali e cambiamento economico locale(Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier), pp. 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauber, U.: 1996. “The Social Embeddedness of Industrial District Networks”, in U. Staber, N.V. Shaefer and B. Sharma (eds.), Business Networks: Prospects for Regional Development(Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), pp. 148–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Testa, F.: 1993, Le dinamiche competitive nel settore della calzetteria femminile(Padova: CEDAM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigilia, C.: 1984, Societa and Politica nelle area di piccole imprese: il caso di Bassano(Venice: Arsenale Editrice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigilia, C.: 1991, “The Paradox of the Region: Economic Regulation and the Representation of Interests”, Economy and Society20: 306–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B.: 1997, “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness”, Administrative Science Quarterly42: 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viola, V.: 1996, “Il Nord-Est allunga il passo: aumento il divario con il Sud”, Il Sole-24 Ore, July 9, p. 10.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lazerson, M., Lorenzoni, G. Resisting Organizational Inertia: The Evolution of Industrial Districts. Journal of Management & Governance 3, 361–377 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009965510858

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009965510858

Keywords

Navigation