Abstract
Our desire to elicit a more complete medical history from our patients ledto the implementation of a preoperative computerized interview. We previouslydemonstrated the effectiveness of the interview by computing its meancompletion time for the overall patient population (n= 120), andfurther examined the effects of age, gender, and educational level. In thisstudy, we investigated patient perception of the interview itself. Before andafter taking the computer interview, we asked the patients to complete a paperand pencil questionnaire comprised of sixteen questions, expressing theirfeelings toward the computer interview. Responses elicited prior to taking thecomputer interview were compared with those obtained afterward. TheStuart–Maxwell test was used to determine statistically significantdifferences in answers before and after the interview. Initial questionnaireresponses reflected a positive attitude toward computer usage which becameeven stronger after the interview. The only negative responses elicited werereally more “doctor positive” than “computernegative.” We conclude that patients looked favorably upon participatingin a computerized medical interview provided that physician–patientcontact is maintained.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Tompkins BM, Tompkins WJ, Loder E, Noonan AF. A computer-assisted preanesthesia interview: Value of 506 Journal of ClinicalMonitoring and Computing Vol 15 Nos 7–8 December 1999 a computer-generated summary of patient's historical information in the preanesthesia visit. Anesth Analg 1980; 59: 3–10
Chodoff P, Drews JH. Decision making in anesthesiology. JAMA 1971; 218: 85–88
Gianaris C. A nurse-computed assisted preoperative anesthesia management system. Comput Biomed Res 1973; 6: 371–392
Cruickshank PJ. Computers in medicine: Patients' attitudes. J RColl Gen Pract 1984; 34: 77–80
Ornstein S, Bearden A. Patient perspectives on computer-based medical records. J Fam Pract 1994; 38: 606–610
Ridsdale L, Hudd S. Computers in the consultation: The patient's view. Br J Gen Pract 1994; 44: 367–369
Als AB. The desk-top computer as a magic box: Patterns of behavior connected with the desk-top computer; GPs' and patients' perceptions. Fam Pract 1997; 14: 17–23
Legler JD, Oates R. Patients' reactions to physician use of a computerized medical record system during clinical encounters. J Fam Pract 1993; 37: 241–244
Solomon G, Dechter M. Are patients pleased with com-puter use in the examination room? J Fam Pract 1995; 41: 241–244
Vitkun SA, Gage JS, Anderson DH, Williams SA, Halpern-Lewis JG, Poppers PJ. Computerization of the preoperative anesthesia interview. Int J Clin Monit Comp 1995; 12: 71–76
Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 1981: 120–123
Warshawsky SS, Pliskin JS, Urkin J et al. Physician use of a computerized medical record system during the patient encounter: A descriptive study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1994; 43: 269–273
Greatbatch D, Heath C, Campion P, Luff P. How do desk-top computers affect the doctor-patient interaction? Fam Pract 1995; 12: 32–36
Brannon L, Feist J. Health psychology. An introduction to behavior and health. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1992
Slack WV, Hicks GP, Reed CE, Van Cura LJ. A computer-based medical-history system. N Engl J Med 1966; 274: 194–198
Rosenman SJ, Levings CT, Korten AE. Clinical utility and patient acceptance of the computerized Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Psychiatr Serv 1997; 48: 815–820
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vitkun, S.A., Halpern-Lewis, J.G., Williams, S.A. et al. Patient's Perceptions of an Anesthesia Preoperative Computerized Patient Interview. J Clin Monit Comput 15, 503–507 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009944409565
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009944409565