Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization in electronic markets: examples in combinatorial auctions

  • Published:
Netnomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Combinatorial auctions provide an important tool for mechanism design in multi-agent systems. When implemented they require to solve combinatorial optimization problems such as set packing and partitioning problems. We present in this paper an analysis of the complexity of the problem to assign bids to bidders in combinatorial auctions. We show that the case of identical assets can be solved in polynomial time. The case of non-identical assets is in its general version NP-hard. Extra structure, like a complete ordering of assets, or mild side conditions make the problem solvable. Finally, we present an algorithm to solve small and medium sized instances in a limited time using standard software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Binmore and N. Vulkan, Applying game theory to automated negotiation, Netnomics 1 (1999) 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Borndörfer, Aspects of Set Packing, Partioning, and Covering (Shaker, Aachen, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Chavez and P. Maes, Kasbah: An agent marketplace for buying and selling goods, in: Proc. of the 1st Internat. Conf. on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM'96), London, UK (April 1996).

  4. M. Fan, J. Stallaert and A.B. Whinston, A web based financial trading system IEEE Comput. (April 1999).

  5. M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (Freeman, San Francisco, CA, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Gomber, C. Schmidt and C. Weinhardt, Efficiency, incentives and computational tractability in MAS-coordination, Internat. J. Cooperative Inform. Systems 8(1) (1999) 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.S. Hochbaum, ed., Approximation Algorithms for NP-Hard Problems (PWS Publishing Company, Boston, MA, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. McMillan, Selling spectrum rights, J. Economic Perspectives 8(3) (1994) 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Müller and A.S. Schulz, Transitive packing, in: Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, Proc. of the 5th Internat. IPCO Conf., eds. W.H. Cunningham, S.T. McCormick and M. Queyranne, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1084 (Springer, Berlin, 1996) pp. 430–444.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Net Exchange, Company homepage: www.nex.com (December 1999).

  11. M.H. Rothkopf, A. Pekeč and R.M. Harstad, Computationally manageable combinational auctions, Managm. Sci. 44(8) (1998) 1131–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T.W. Sandholm, An algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions, in: Proc. of the 16th Internat. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Stockholm, Sweden (1999).

  13. T.W. Sandholm, Approaches to winner determination in combinatorial auctions, Decision Support Systems (2000) forthcoming.

  14. S. Srinivasan, Electronic trading of portfolios - an experimental approach, Doctoral dissertation, Department of Economics, University of Texas at Austin (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Varian, Economic mechanism design for computerized agents, in: Usenix Workshop on Electronic Commerce, New York (July 11-12, 1995).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Hoesel, S., Müller, R. Optimization in electronic markets: examples in combinatorial auctions. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking 3, 23–33 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009940607600

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009940607600

Navigation