Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pesticidal effects on mortality and parasitismrates of Diadegma semiclausum, aparasitoid of the diamondback moth

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The contact and oral toxicity of fielddoses of selected pesticides against the cocoon andadult stages of a hymenopterous parasitoid Diadegma semiclausum were studied using severalbioassays. Field rates of ten pesticides wereselective to the parasitoid pupae. Fresh residue(s)of cartap, chlorfenapyr, emamectin benzoate andpermethrin were highly toxic, causing 100% mortalityof adult females in every treatment. Residual effectsof these four insecticides on cabbage foliage showedthat only cartap was highly persistent. Cartapresidues caused 100% mortality for over 30 d. In thesame assay three chitin synthesis inhibitors(chlorfluazuron, flufenoxuron and teflubenzuron) andone fungicide/bactericide (copper nonylphenolsulfonate) and two bactericides (kasugamycin andoxolinic acid) were nontoxic to adults. Effects ofcontact toxicity of chitin synthesis inhibitors andfungicides/bactericides on the untreated progeny oftreated parents was also determined: there was nosignificant difference in parasitism rates betweenprogeny of treated and untreated adults. When thefield doses of these chemicals were fed orally,mortality of female parasitoids ranged from 0% to17.23%. However, oral ingestion adversely affectedthe parasitism rate (p < 0.05) in alltreatments except oxolinic acid. Selectivity oftested pesticides against D. semiclausum andintegration of compatible pesticides with thisparasitoid for IPM of cabbage are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, W.S., 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J.Econ.Entomol. 18: 265–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous., 1987. The Agrochemicals Handbook. 2nd edition. Royal Society of Chemistry, UK. 422 pp.

  • Baloch, U.K. and M. Haseeb, 1996. Persistent pesticide pollutants in crop protection. In: M.L. Richardson (ed.), Risk Reduction: Chemicals and Energy into the 21st Century. Taylor and Francis, London, UK. pp. 329–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, F. and M. Waldburger, 1994. Pesticides and beneficial organisms. Bull.IOBC/WPRS 17. 178 pp.

  • Chiverton, P.A., 1984. Pitfall trap catches of the carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius in relation to gut contents and prey densities, in insecticide treated and untreated spring barley. Entomol.Exp.Appl. 36: 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoStat, 1995. Statistical Software. CoStat manual. Minneapolis, MN. 371 pp.

  • Croft, B.A., 1990. Arthropod Biological Control Agents and Pesticides. Wiley and Sons, New York. 723 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estolas,W.R., 1997. Atok's bare foot scientists using IPM. Philippines. J.Crop.Sci.Supp. 22: 75 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, J.M., 1975. Pesticides and beneficial arthropods. Bull.OILB/SROP 1: 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greathead, D.J., 1995. Natural enemies in combination with pesticides for integrated pest management. In: R. Reuveni (ed.), Novel Approaches to Integrated Pest Management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp. 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Happe, M., K. Kirchoff, W.G. Wassenegger and G. Madel, 1988. The biology of the parasitic wasp Diadegma semiclausum Hellen (Hym., Ich.) and its host Plutella xylostella Curtis (Lep., Ypon.). Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie 6: 146–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, J.E., 1938. Plutella maculipennis Curt., its natural enemies and biological control in England. Bull.Entomol.Res. 29: 343–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, S.A., 1989. Testing methodology and the concept of the IOBC/WPRS working group. In: P.C. Jepson (ed.), Pesticides and Non-target Invertebrates. Intercept, Hants. pp. 1–18.

  • Hassan, S.A., 1992. Guidelines for testing the effects of pesticides on beneficial organisms: description of test methods. Bull.IOBC/WPRS 15/3. 186 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, S.A., 1994. Activities of the IOBC/WPRSWorking Group-Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms. In H. Vogt (ed.), Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms. Bull.IOBC/WPRS 17: 1–5.

  • Idris, A.B. and E. Grafius, 1993. Field studies on the effect of pesticides on the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) and parasitism by Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). J.Econ.Entomol. 86: 1196–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idris, A.B. and E. Grafius, 1997. Nectar collecting behavior of Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), a parasitoid of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Environ.Entomol. 26: 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOBC/WPRS, 1994. Pesticides and beneficial organisms. Bull.IOBC/WPRS 17. 178 pp.

  • Jepson, P.C., 1989. The temporal and spatial dynamics of pesticide side effects on non-target invertebrates. Intercept, Hants. pp. 95–128.

  • Lasota, J.A. and R.A. Dybas, 1991. Avermectin, a novel class of compounds: implications for use in arthropod pest control. Annu.Rev.Entomol. 36: 91–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.O., 1917. Life history of Plutella maculipennis, the diamondback moth. J.Agri.Res. 10: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, Z., D. Blumberg and I. Ishaaya, 1994. Effects of some insect growth regulators on natural enemies of scale insects (Hom.: Coccoidea). Entomophaga 39: 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merck, 1995. Emamectin Benzoate Insecticide. Merck, Whitehorse, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muggeridge, J., 1939. Parasitic control of pests. Experiment with white butterfly and diamondback moth. N.Z.J.Agri. 58: 305–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustata, G., 1992. Role of parasitoid complex in limiting the population of diamondback moth in Maldavia, Romania. In: N.S. Talekar (ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Diamondback Moth and Other Crucifer Pests. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan. pp. 203–211.

  • Newsom, L.D., R.F. Smith and W.H. Whitcomb, 1976. Selective pesticides and selective use of pesticides. In: C.B. Huffaker and D.S. Messenger (eds), Theory and Practice of Biological Control. Academic Press, New York. pp. 565–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obra, J.B., 1995. Selectivity of several pesticides to Cotesia plutellae (Kurdjumov) and Diadegma semiclausum (Hellén), larval parasitoids of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. Master dissertation. Philippines Uni. Los Banos. 91 pp.

  • Ooi, A.C.P., 1986. Diamondback moth in Malaysia. In: Diamondback Moth Management.Proceedings of 1st International Workshop, Tainan, Taiwan. pp. 25–34.

  • Petersen, L.S., 1993. Effects of 45 insecticides, acaricides and molluscicides on the rove beetle Aleochara bilineata (Col.: Staphylinidae) in the laboratory. Entomophaga 38: 371–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poelking, A., 1992. Diamondback moth in the Philippines and its control with Diadegma semiclausum. In: N.S. Talekar (ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Diamondback Moth and Other Crucifer Pests. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan. pp. 271–278.

  • Ruberson, J.R., H. Nemoto and Y. Hirose, 1998. Pesticides and conservation of natural enemies in pest management. In: P. Barbosa (ed.), Conservation Biological Control. Academic Press, New York. pp. 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastrosiswojo, S. and S. Sastrodiharjo, 1986. Status of biological control of diamondback moth by introduction of parasitoid Diadegma eucerophaga in Indonesia. In: N.S. Talekar and T.D. Griggs (eds), Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Diamondback Moth Management. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Centre, Shanhua, Taiwan. pp. 185–194.

  • Sastrosiswojo, S., 1996. Biological control of the diamondback moth in IPM systems: case study from Asia (Indonesia). In: Proceedings of an International Symposium on Biological Control Interactions-Opportunities for Improved Crop Production. Brighton, UK. pp. 13–32.

  • Steel, R.J.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 2nd edition. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talekar, N.S., J.C. Yang, M.Y. Liu and P.C. Ong, 1990. Use of parasitoids to control the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. In: O. Mochida, K. Kritiani and J. Bay-Peterson (eds), The Use of Natural Enemies to Control Agricultural Pests. Food and Fertilizer Technology Centre for the Asian and Pacific Region, FFTC Book Series 40: 106–114.

  • Talekar, N.S. and J.C. Yang, 1991. Characteristics of parasitism of the diamondback moth by two larval parasites. Entomophaga 36: 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, H.C.C.A.A., 1953. Introduction in Indonesia of Angitia cerophaga Grav., a parasite of Plutella maculipennis Curt. Contr.Gen.Agri.Res.Stn.Bogor. 134: 32 pp.

  • Waage, J., 1996. Yes, but does it work in the field? The challenge of technology transfer in biological control. Entomophaga 41: 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G.H. and L.L. McDowell, 1987. Pesticide persistence on foliage. Rev.Environ.Contam.Toxicol. 100: 23–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F., 1960. A review of the biological control of insect and weeds in Australia and Australian New Guinea. Commonw.Inst.Biol.Control.Ottawa, Canada, Tech.Comm. 1: 102 pp.

  • Wislocki, P.G., L.S. Grosso and R.A. Dybas, 1989. Environmental aspects of abamectin use in crop protection. N.Z.Vet.J. 29: 182–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Jer-C., Yau-I. Chu and N.S. Talekar, 1993. Biological studies of Diadegma semiclausum (Hym.: Ichneumonidae), a parasite of diamondback moth. Entomophaga 38: 579–586.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Amano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haseeb, M., Amano, H. & Nemoto, H. Pesticidal effects on mortality and parasitismrates of Diadegma semiclausum, aparasitoid of the diamondback moth. BioControl 45, 165–178 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009930603601

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009930603601

Navigation