Skip to main content

What is a healthy ecosystem?

Abstract

Rapid deterioration of the world's major ecosystems has intensified the need for effective environmental monitoring and the development of operational indicators of ecosystem health. Ecosystem health represents a desired endpoint of environmental management, but it requires adaptive, ongoing definition and assessment. We propose that a healthy ecosystem is one that is sustainable – that is, it has the ability to maintain its structure (organization) and function (vigor) over time in the face of external stress (resilience). Various methods to quantify these three ecosystem attributes (vigor, organization, and resilience) are discussed. These attributes are then folded into a comprehensive assessment of ecosystem health. A network analysis based ecosystem health assessment is developed and tested using trophic exchange networks representing several different aquatic ecosystems. Results indicate the potential of such an ecosystem health assessment for evaluating the relative health of similar ecosystems, and quantifying the effects of natural or anthropogenic stress on the health of a particular ecosystem over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Baird D and Ulanowicz RE (1993) Comparative study on the trophic structure, cycling and ecosystem properties of four tidal estuaries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 99: 221–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber M, Patten B and Finn J (1979) Review and evaluation of I-O flow analysis for ecological applications. In: Matis J, Patten B and White G (eds.), Compartmental Analysis of Ecosystem Models. Vol. 10 of Statistical Ecology. Bertonsville, Md.: International Cooperative Publishing House

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayne BL (1987) The Effects of Stress and Pollution on Marine Animals. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen V (1995) Ecosystem maturity — Towards quantification. Ecol Model 77: 3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen V and Pualy D (1992) ECOPATH II — a software for balancing steady-state ecosystem models, and calculating netwok characteristics. Ecol Model 61: 169–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R (1992) Toward an operational definition of health. In: Costanza R, Norton B and Haskell B (eds.) Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R and Neill C (1984) Energy intensities, interdependence, and value in ecological systems: A linear programming approach. J Theor Biol 106: 41–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Norton B and Haskell BJ (1992) Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R and Maxwell T (1993) Resolution and predictability: an approach to the scaling problem. Landscape Ecol 9: 47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R and Patten BC (1995) Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecol Econ 15: 193–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R and Sklar FH (1985) Articulation, accuracy, and effectiveness of mathematical models: A review of freshwater wetland applications. Ecol Model 27: 45–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Sklar FH and White ML (1990) Modeling coastal landscape dynamics. BioScience 40: 91–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumberland JH (1987) Need economic development be hazardous to the health of the Chesapeake Bay? Mar Resour Econ 4: 81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly H (1968) On economics as a life science. J Political Econ 76: 392–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Field JG, Moloney CL and Attwood CG (1989) Network analysis of simulated succession after an upwelling event. In: Wulff F, Field JG and Mann KH (eds) Network analysis of marine ecosystems: methods and applications. Coastal and Estuarine Studies Series (Chapter 7) Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn J (1976) The cycling index. J Theor Biol 56: 363–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Funderlic R and Heath M (1971) Linear Compartmental Analysis of Ecosystems. ORNL-IBP–71–4. Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon B (1973) The structure of ecosystems. J Theor Biol 41: 535–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon B (1976) Marginal product pricing in the ecosystem. J Theor Biol 56: 256–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon B (1979) Total energy costs in ecosystems. J Theor Biol 80: 271–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon B (1985a) Ecosystem flow analysis. Can Bull Fish Aquat Sci 213: 97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon B (1985b) Conditioning the ecosystem. Math Biol 75: 23–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon B (1985c) Linear dynamic ecosystems. J Theor Biol 116: 89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon B and Ruth M (1994) Dynamic Modeling. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1978) Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1986) The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change. In: Clark WC and Munn RE (eds) Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1987) Simplifying the complex: The paradigms of ecological function and structure. Eur J Operat Res 30: 139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard W (1972) Ecologic-Economic Analysis for Regional Development. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR (1991) Biological integrity: A long neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecol Appl 1: 66–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief W (1941) The Structure of the American Economy, 1919–1939. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mageau MT, Costanza R and RE Ulanowicz (1995) The development and initial testing of a quantitative assessment of ecosystem health. Ecosyst Health 1: 201–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Mageau MT, Costanza R and Ulanowicz RE (In press) Quantifying the trends associated with developing ecosystems. Ecol Model

  • Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164: 262–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT (1971) Environment, Power and Society. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL (1984) The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307: 321–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport DJ (1992) Evaluating ecosystem health. J. Aquat Ecosyst Health 1: 15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport DJ, Regier HA and Hutchinson TC (1985) Ecosystem behavior under stress. Am Nat 125: 617–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Science Advisory Board (1990) Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental Protection. SAB-EC–90–021. EPA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Costanza R and Sklar FH (1989) Methods to compare spatial patterns for landscape modeling and analysis. Ecol Model 48: 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (1980) A hypothesis on the development of natural communities. J Theor Biol 85: 223–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (1986) Growth and Development: Ecosystems Phenomenology. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (1995) The propensities of evolving systems. In: Khalil EL and Boulding KE (eds) Social and Natural Complexity

  • Wulff F and Ulanowicz RE (1989) A comparative anatomy of the Baltic Sea and Chesapeake Bay ecosystems. In: Wulff F, Field JG and Mann KH (eds.) Network analysis of marine ecology: methods and applications. Coastal and Estuarine Studies Series (Chapter 11) Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulff F, Field JG and Mann KH (1989) Network Analysis of Marine Ecosystems: Methods and Applications. Coastal and Estuarine Studies Series. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costanza, R., Mageau, M. What is a healthy ecosystem?. Aquatic Ecology 33, 105–115 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009930313242

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009930313242

  • estuaries
  • network analysis
  • resilience
  • vigor