Advertisement

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 27–46 | Cite as

Learning to Teach Elementary Mathematics: Ecological Elements of a Field Experience

  • Denise S. Mewborn
Article

Abstract

Three elements of the ecology of a mathematics methodsfield experience were particularly important topromoting a shift in locus of authority thatprecipitated reflective thinking among the preserviceteachers: (a) an inquiry perspective, (b) the cohortgroup, and (c) school-university collaboration. Thearticle describes these three aspects of the ecologyof the field experience and provides the perspectivesof the mentor teacher, preservice teacher, and teachereducator. Also included are new challenges andproblems that arose with each aspect.

elementary field experience mathematics reflection teacher education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Addison, R.B. (1989). Grounded interpretive research: An investigation of physician socialization. In M.J. Packer & R.B. Addison (Eds.), Entering the circle: Hermeneutic investigation in psychology (pp. 39–57). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arends, R. & Winitzky, N. (1996). Program structures and learning to teach. In F.B.Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator's handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 526–556). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Black, A. & Ammon, P. (1992). A developmental-constructivist approach to teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 323–335.Google Scholar
  4. Britzman, D.P. (1986). Cultural myths in the making of a teacher: Biography and social structure in teacher education. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 442–472.Google Scholar
  5. Calderhead, J. (1989). Reflective teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 43–51.Google Scholar
  6. Carter, K. & Anders, D. (1996). Program pedagogy. In F.B. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator's handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 557–592). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Cruickshank, D.R. (1990). Research that informs teachers and teacher educators. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.Google Scholar
  8. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Heath.Google Scholar
  9. Feiman-Nemser, S. & Buchmann, M. (1987). When is student teaching teacher education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 255–273.Google Scholar
  10. Fuller, F.F. & Bown, O.H. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In National Society for the Study of Education (Ed.), Seventy-fourth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 25–52). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
  11. Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  12. Goodlad, J.I. (1990). Teachers for our nation's schools.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Goodman, J. (1984). Reflection and teacher education: A case study and theoretical analysis. Interchange, 15(3), 9–26.Google Scholar
  14. Goodman, J. (1985). What students learn from early field experiences: A case study and critical analysis. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(6), 42–48.Google Scholar
  15. Knowles, J.G. & Cole, A.L. (1996). Developing practice through field experiences. In F.B. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator's handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 648–688). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Lanier, J.E. & Little, J.W. (1986). Research on teacher education. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 527–569). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Lasley, T.J. & Applegate, J.H. (1985). Problems of early field experience students of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1, 221–227.Google Scholar
  18. Mewborn, D.S. (1998). The quarter quandary: An illustration of NCTM's Professional Teaching Standards. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(3), 160–163.Google Scholar
  19. Mewborn, D.S. (1999). Reflective thinking in preservice elementary mathematics teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 316–341.Google Scholar
  20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  23. Rigden, D.W. (1996).What teachers have to say about teacher education. Perspective, 8(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
  24. Schwab, J.J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. School Review, 81, 501–522.Google Scholar
  25. Su, Z. (1990). The function of the peer group in teacher socialization. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 723–727.Google Scholar
  26. Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J. & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68, 130–178.Google Scholar
  27. Zeichner, K.M. (1985). The ecology of field experience: Toward an understanding of the role of field experiences in teacher development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 18(3), 44–52.Google Scholar
  28. Zeichner, K.M. & Gore, J.M. (1990). Teacher socialization. In W.R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 329–348). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denise S. Mewborn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics EducationThe University of GeorgiaAthensUSA e-mail:

Personalised recommendations