Aquatic Ecology

, 33:205 | Cite as

Predator-prey interactions between two amphibian species: effects of insecticide exposure

  • Christine M. Bridges


The presence of environmental contaminants may alter predator-prey interactions among aquatic species by altering activity levels of predators or prey, or by altering predator avoidance behavior. The outcome of a predatory encounter may be dependent upon whether both species are exposed to a contaminant simultaneously, or whether exposure occurs only in one of the species. In a laboratory experiment, I used the insecticide carbaryl to examine predation of southern leopard frog tadpoles (Rana sphenocephala) by adult red-spotted newts (Notophthalmus viridescens) under four conditions: both tadpoles and newts exposed, neither tadpoles nor newts exposed, and either newts or tadpoles only exposed. After one hour, exposed newts consumed half as many tadpoles as non-exposed newts. Carbaryl potentially affected newt activity enough to reduce time spent searching for prey, or may have altered the speed and coordination necessary to capture tadpoles. After six hours, non-exposed and exposed newts consumed similar numbers of tadpoles, most likely indicating recovery from exposure. After 24 h, predation rates were lowest when both newts and tadpoles were simultaneously either exposed or not exposed, and were greatest when newts and tadpoles were not exposed simultaneously. This study suggests that when tadpoles and newts are exposed to a sublethal level of a contaminant simultaneously, that predation rates do not differ from those observed under natural conditions, but exposure of either predator or prey at different times can disrupt predator-prey dynamics.

carbaryl newt pesticide predation rates Rana sublethal effects tadpole 


  1. Baltz DM, Moyle PB and Knight NJ (1982) Competitive interactions between benthic stream fishes, riffle sculpin, Cottus gulosus, and speckled dace, Rhinichthys osculus. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39: 1502–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barinaga M (1990) Where have all the froggies gone? Science 247: 1033–1034PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berrill M, Bertram S, Wilson A, Louis S, Brigham D and Stromberg C (1993) Lethal and sublethal impacts of pyrethroid insecticides on amphibian embryos and tadpoles. Environ Toxicol Chem 12: 525–539Google Scholar
  4. Blaustein AR and Wake DB (1990) Declining amphibian populations: A global phenomenon? Trends Ecol Evol 5: 203–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boone MD and Bridges CM (1999) The effect of temperature on the potency of carbaryl for survival of tadpoles of the green frog (Rana clamitans). Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 1482–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bridges CM (1997) Tadpole swimming performance and activity affected by acute exposure to sublethal levels of carbaryl. Environ Toxicol Chem 16: 1935–1939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bridges CM (1999) Effects of a pesticide on tadpole activity and predator avoidance behavior. J Herpetol 33: 303–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cairns J Jr (1986) The myth of the most sensitive species. Bio-Science 36: 670–672Google Scholar
  9. Cooke AS (1971) Selective predation by newts on frog tadpoles treated with DDT. Nature 229: 275–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clements WH, Cherry DS and Cairns J Jr (1989) The influence of copper exposure on predator-prey interactions in aquatic insect communities. Freshw Biol 21: 483–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummins CP (1989) Interaction between the effects of pH and density on growth and development in Rana temporaria L. tadpoles. Funct Ecol 3: 45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dodson SI, Hanazato T and Gorski PR (1995) Behavioral responses of Daphnia pulex exposed to carbaryl and Chaoborus kairomone. Environ Toxicol Chem 14: 43–50Google Scholar
  13. Dunson WA and Travis J (1991) The role of abiotic factors in community organization. Am Nat 138: 1067–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eriksson MOG, Henrikson L, Nilsson B-I, Nyman G, Oscarson GG and Stenson AE (1980) Predator-prey relations important for the biotic changes in acidified lakes. Ambio 9: 248–249Google Scholar
  15. Gibbs KE, Mingo TM and Courtemanch DL (1984) Persistence of carbaryl (Sevin-4-Oil®) in woodland ponds and its effects on pond macroinvertebrates following forest spraying. Can Ent 116: 203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gill DE (1978) The metapopulation ecology of the red-spotted newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque). Ecol Monog 48: 145–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gomez A, Ceccine G and Snell TW (1997) Effect of pentachlorophenol on predator-prey interaction of two rotifers. Aquat Toxicol 37: 271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ham L, Quinn R and Pascoe D (1995) Effects of cadmium on the predator-prey interaction between the turbellarian Dendrocoelum lacteum (Muller, 1774) and the isopod crustacean Asellus aquaticus (L.). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 29: 358–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamers T and Krogh PH (1997) Predator-prey relationships in a two-species toxicity test system. Ecotox Env Safety 37: 203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hastings FL, Werner RA, Shea PJ and Holston EH (1998) Persistence of carbaryl within boreal, temperate and Mediterranean ecosystems. J Econ Entomol 91: 665–670Google Scholar
  21. Jung RE and Jagoe CH (1995) Effects of low pH and aluminum on body size, swimming performance, and susceptibility to predation of green tree frog (Hyla cinerea) tadpoles. Can J Zool 73: 2171–2183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kiesecker J (1996) pH mediated predator-prey interactions between Ambystoma tigrinum and Pseudacris triseriata. Ecol Appl 6: 1325–1331Google Scholar
  23. Little EE (1990) Behavioral toxicology: stimulating challenges for a growing discipline. Environ Toxicol Chem 9: 1–2Google Scholar
  24. Liu D, Thomson K and Strachan WMJ (1981) Biodegradation of carbaryl in simulated aquatic environment. Bull Environm Contam Toxicol 27: 412–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marian MP, Arul V and Pandian TJ (1983) Acute and chronic effects of carbaryl on survival, growth, and metamorphosis in the bullfrog (Rana tigrina). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 12: 271–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moore MK and Townsend VR Jr (1998) The interaction of temperature, dissolved oxygen and predation pressure in an aquatic predator-prey system. Oikos 81: 329–336Google Scholar
  27. Morin PJ (1983) Predation, competition, and the composition of larval anuran guilds. Ecol Monog 53: 119–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Norris LA, Lorz HW and Gregory SV (1983) Influence of forest and range land management on anadromous fish habitat in western North America: Forest chemicals. General Technical Report PNW-149. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Portland, OregonGoogle Scholar
  29. Raimondo SM, Rowe CL and Congdon JD (1998) Exposure to coal ash impacts swimming performance and predator avoidance in larval bullfrogs (Rana catesbieana). J Herpetol 32: 289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ricklefs, RE 1990. Ecology. W.H. Freeman and Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Rowe CL and Dunson WA (1995) Impacts of hydroperiod on growth and survival of larval amphibians in temporary ponds of Central Pennsylvania, USA. Oecologia 102: 397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rzehak K, Maryanska-Nadachowska A and Jordan M (1977) The effect of Karbatox 75, a carbaryl insecticide, upon the development of tadpoles of Rana temporaria and Xenopus laevis. Folia Biol 25: 391–399Google Scholar
  33. Sadinsky WJ and Dunson WA (1992) A multilevel study of effects of low pH on amphibians of temporary ponds. J Herpetol 26: 413–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Semlistch RD, Foglia M, Mueller A, Steiner I, Fioramonti E and Fent K. (1995) Short-term exposure to triphenyltin affects the swimming and feeding behavior of tadpoles. Environ Toxicol Chem 14: 1419–1423Google Scholar
  35. Semlitsch RD, Scott DE and Pechmann JHK (1988) Time and size at metamorphosis related to adult fitness in Ambystoma talpoideum. Ecology 69: 184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith DC (1987) Adult recruitment in chorus frogs: Effects of size and date at metamorphosis. Ecology 68: 344–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sousa WP (1984) The role of disturbance in natural communities. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15: 353–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Taylor EJ, Morrison JE, Blockwell SJ, Tarr A and Pascoe D (1995) Effects of lindane on the predator-prey interaction between Hydra oligactis Pallas and Daphnia magna Strauss. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 29: 291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. US Environmental Protection Agency (1992) Pesticide industry sales and usage: 1990 and 1991 market estimates. In: Pesticides and Toxic Substances. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Wake, DB (1998) Action on amphibians. Trends Ecol Evol 13: 379–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Warner SC, Travis J and Dunson WA (1993) Effect of pH variation on interspecific competition between two species of hylid tadpoles. Ecology 74: 183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Warner SC, Dunson WA and Travis J (1991) Interaction of pH, density, and priority effects on the survivorship and growth of two species of hylid tadpoles. Oecologia 88: 331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilbur HM (1987) Regulation of structure in complex systems: experimental temporary pond communities. Ecology 68: 1437–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine M. Bridges
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations