Abstract
The life cycle and host specificity of Ectaga garcia were investigated. Moths emerge in the morning and are inactive during the day. Eggs are laid and larvae feed on the undersurface of leaves of Lantana camara and L. montevidensis. Larvae spin protective cocoons from which they feed and in which they pupate. Development from egg to adult takes approximately 48 days. Forty-five plant species were tested to determine host specificity. Females laid eggs only on L. camara and L. montevidensis. In no-choice trials, neonate larvae fed but failed to complete development on nine test species. E. garcia was subsequently approved for release in Australia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, V.O., 1994. A new Ectaga Walsingham (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae) from southern South America. Revisia Brasileira de Zoologia 11: 391–394.
Cullen, J.M., 1989. Current problems in host specificity screening. In: E.S. Delfosse (ed), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, Rome, Italy 1988. Instituto Sperimentale per la Patologia Vegetale Ministero dell ‘Agricoltura e delle Foreste, Rome. pp. 27–36.
Culvenor, C.C.J., 1985. Economic loss due to poisonous plants in Australia. In: A.A. Seawright, M.P. Hegarty, L.F. James and R.F. Keeler (eds), 'Plant Toxicity', Proceedings of the Australia – USA Poisonous Plants Symposium, Brisbane, 1984. Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Bnsbane. pp. 3–13.
Davis, D.R., R.C. Kassulke, K.L.S. Harley and J.D. Gillett, 1991. Systematics, morphology, biology, and host specificity of Neurostrota gunniella (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Gracillaridae), an agent for the biological control of Mimosa pigra L. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 93: 16–44.
Forno, L.W., R.C. Kassulke and M.D. Day, 1991. Life cycle and host testing procedures for Carmenta mimosa Eichlin and Passoa (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae), a biological control agent for Mimosa pigra L. (Mimosaceae) in Australia. Biol. Contr. 1: 309–315.
Harley, K.L.S. and I.W. Forno, 1992. Biological Control of Weeds: A Handbook for Practitioners and Students. Inkata Press, Melbourne.
Harris, P., 1973. The selection of effective agents for the biological control of weeds. Can. Entomol. 105: 1495–1503.
Harris, P., 1984. Current approaches to biological control of weeds. In: J.S. Kelleher and M.A. Hulme (eds), Biological Control Programmes Against Insects and Weeds in Canada 1969– 1980. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farham Royal. pp. 95–103.
Haseler, W.H., 1966. The status of insects introduced for the biological control of weeds in Queensland. J. Entomol. Soc. Queensland 5: 1–4.
Hoffman, J.H. and V.C. Moran, 1998. The population dynamics of an introduced tree, Sesbania punicea, in South Africa, in response to long-term damage caused by different combinations of three species of biological control agents. Oecologia 114: 343–348.
Holm, L.G., D.L. Pluckett, J.V. Pancho and J.P. Herberger, 1977. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu. pp. 299–302.
Iwao, K. and M.D. Rausher, 1997. Evolution of plant resistance to multiple herbivores: Quantifying diffuse coevolution. The American Naturalist 149: 316–335.
Julien, M.H., 1992. Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds, 3rd Edition. CAB International, Wallingford. pp. 89–108.
Marohasy, J., 1998. The design and interpretation of host-specificity tests for weed biological control with particular reference to insect behaviour. Biocontrol News and Information 19: 13–20.
Neser, S. and C.J. Cilliers, 1989. Work towards biological control of Lantana camara: Perspectives. In: E.S. Delfosse (ed), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, Rome 1988. Instituto Sperimentale per la Patologia Vegetale Ministero dell ‘Agricoltura e delle Foreste, Rome. pp. 363–369.
Palmer, W.A., B.W. Willson and K.R. Pullen, 1996. The host range of Aconophora compressa Walker (Homoptera: Membracidae): A potential biological control agent for Lantana camara L. (Verbenaceae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 98: 617–624.
Parsons W.T. and E.G. Cuthbertson, 1992. Noxious Weeds of Australia. Inkata Press, Melbourne. pp. 627–634.
Smith, L.S. and D.A. Smith, 1982. The naturalised Lantana camara complex in eastern Australia. Queensland Botany Bulletin No. 1. Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane.
Stirton, C.H., 1977. Some thoughts on the polyploid complex Lantana camara L. (Verbenaceae). In: E.G.H. Oliver (ed), Proceedings of the 2nd National Weeds Conference of South Africa. February 2–4, 1997, Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands. pp. 321–340.
Swarbrick, J.T., R.W. Willson and M.A. Hannan-Jones, 1995. The biology of Australian weeds. 25. Lantana camara L. Plant Protection Quarterly 10: 82–95.
Taylor, E.E., 1989. A history of biological control of Lantana camara in New South Wales. Plant Protection Quarterly 4: 61–65.
Wapshere, A.J., 1975. A protocol for programmes for biological control of weeds. PANS 21: 295–303.
Winder, J.A. and K.L.S. Harley, 1982. The effects of natural enemies on the growth of Lantana in Brazil. Bull. Entomol. Res. 72: 599–616.
Winder, J.A. and K.L.S. Harley, 1983. The phytophagous insects on lantana in Brazil and their potential for biological control in Australia. Tropic. Pest Manage. 29: 346–362.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Day, M., Willson, B. & Latimer, K. The life history and host range of Ectagagarcia, a biological control agent for Lantana camra and L. montevidensis in Australia. BioControl 43, 325–338 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009922310745
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009922310745