Skip to main content
Log in

The Grasshoppers and the Great Cattle: Participation and Non-Participation in the ASB's Standard-Setting Process

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a research study of participation in the accounting standard-setting process in the United Kingdom. The study considers the 1,519 responses to the Accounting Standards Board's ('the ASB') proposals for accounting standards. Consistent with the findings of other studies in the USA and Australia, the present paper finds that there is a high level of participation by the preparers of financial statements in the ASB's consultation process. The paper then examines the size of the preparer firms which formally lobby the ASB. The evidence confirms that those firms which become involved in the lobbying process in the UK tend to be larger than non-lobbying firms, and the paper concludes that, as elswhere, the standard-setting process in the UK appears to be a discourse of the powerful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accounting Standards Board: 1991, Statement of Aims (London: ASB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M.A.: 1977, “The Politics of Esta»lishing Accounting Standards”, Journal of Accountancy (Fe»ruary): 76–79.

  • Beresford, D.R.: 1991, “Standard-Setting Process in Trou»le (Again)”, Accounting Horizons (June): 9496.

  • Brown, P.R.: 1981, “A Descriptive Analysis of Select Input Bases of the FASB”, Journal of Accounting Research (Spring) 19(1): 232–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, M. and M.C. Mahaney: 1981, “The Politics of Standard-Setting”, Management Accounting (March) 62(9): 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. and M.J. Sherer: 1984, “The Value of Corporate Accounting Reports: Arguments for a Political Economy of Accounting”, Accounting, Organisations and Society 9(3/4): 207–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R.A.: 1961, Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R.A.: 1976, Modern Political Analysis (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A.: 1957, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, Sir Ron: 1988, The Making of Accounting Standards (London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dun & Bradstreet International: 1992, Corporate Financial Performance – Britain's Top 50,000 Companies, Vol. 6 (Bucks: Dun & Bradstreet Ltd.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dun & Bradstreet International: 1993, Corporate Financial Performance – Britain's Top 50,000 Companies, Vol. 6 (Bucks: Dun & Bradstreet Ltd.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dun & Bradstreet International: 1994, Corporate Financial Performance – Britain's Top 50,000 Companies, Vol. 6 (Bucks: Dun & Bradstreet Ltd.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Reporting Council: 1992, The State of Financial Reporting: Second Annual Review (London: The Financial Reporting Council Limited).

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Reporting Council: 1994, The State of Financial Reporting: Annual Review 1994 (London: The Financial Reporting Council Limited).

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Reporting Council: 1997, Financial Reporting Council: Progress Report 1997 (London: The Financial Reporting Council Limited).

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J.R.: 1987, “Lobbying Against Proposed Accounting Standards: The Case of Employers' Pension Accounting”, Journal of Accounting and Pu»lic Policy (Spring) 6(1): 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavens, J.J., G.D. Carnegie and R.W. Gi»son: 1989, “Company Participation in the Australian Accounting Standards Setting Process”, Accounting and Finance (Novem»er) 47–58.

  • Hagerman, R. and M. Zmijewski: 1979, “Some Economic Determinants of Accounting Policy Choice”, Journal of Accounting and Economics (April): 141–161.

  • Hope, T. and R. Gray: 1982, “Power and Policy Making: The Development of an R&D Standard”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (April) 9(4): 531–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kam, V.: 1990, Accounting Theory, 2nd. Edn. (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S.: 1974, Power: A Radical View (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S.: 1986, Power (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E.: 1962, “Entry, Gi»rat's Law, Innovation and the Growth of Firms”, The American Economic Review (42): 479–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mautz, R.K.: 1974, “The Other Accounting Standards Board”, The Journal of Accountancy (Fe»ruary): 56–60.

  • Mezias, S.J. and H. Chung: 1989, Due Process and Participation at the FASB (Morristown, NJ: Financial Executives Research Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merelman, R.M.: 1968, “On the Neo-élitist Critique of Community Power”, American Political Science Review: 451–460.

  • Miller, P.: 1985, “Too Much Preparer Dominance in Standards Setting”, The Chartered Accountant in Australia (Novem»er) 56(5): 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R.D.: 1986, “Lobbying on Proposed Accounting Standards”, The Chartered Accountant in Australia (March) 56(8).

  • Ó hÓgartaigh, C. and E. Reilly: 1997, “Perceptions of Performance: The Reactions of Analysts and Institutional Investors to FRS 3”, The Irish Accounting Review (Spring) 4: 124–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pols»y, N.W.: 1963, Community Power and Political Theory (New Haven and London: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pols»y, N.W.: 1968, “Community: The Study of Community Power”, in International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 3 (New York: Macmillan and Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saemann, G.P.: 1987, A Model of NYSE Manager Position and Participation Choice on the March 1985 FASB ED: Employers' Accounting for Pensions. Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University.

  • Saemann, G.P.: 1995, “The Accounting Standard-Setting Due Process, Corporate Consensus, and FASB Responsiveness: Employers' Accounting for Pensions”, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance (Summer) 10(3): 555–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalow, C.M.: 1995, “Participation Choice: The Exposure Draft for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions”, Accounting Horizons (March) 9(1): 24–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunder, S.: 1980, Towards a Theory of Accounting Choice: Private and Social Decisions. Working Paper (University of Chicago).

  • Sutton, T.G.: 1984, “Lobbying of Accounting Standard-Setting Bodies in the UK and the USA: A Downsian Analysis”, Accounting, Organisations and Society 9(1): 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandy, P.R. and N.L. Wil»urn: 1992, “Constituent Participation in Standard-Setting: The FASB's First 100 Statements”, Accounting Horizons (June) 6(2): 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. and S. Turley: 1986, The Regulation of Accounting (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutticci, I., K. Dunstan and S. Holmes: 1994, “Respondent Lobbying in the Australian Accounting Standard-Setting Process: ED49 – A Case Study”, Accounting Auditing and Accounta»ility Journal 7(2): 86–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underdown, B. and P. Taylor: 1986, Accounting Theory and Policy Making (London: Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.G.: 1987, “Australia's ASRB. A Case Study of Political Activity and Regulatory ‘Capture’ ”, Accounting and Business Research (Summer) 17(67): 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.G. and S.P. Robinson: 1993, “A Critical Assessment of the Literature on Political Activity and Accounting Regulation”, Research in Accounting Regulation 7: 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R.L.: 1977, “Corporate Financial Statements, A Product of the Market and Political Processes”, Australian Journal of Management (2): 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R.L. and J.L. Zimmerman: 1978, “Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards”, The Accounting Review (January) LIII(1): 112–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R.L. and J.L. Zimmerman: 1986, Positive Accounting Theory (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R.L. and J.L. Zimmerman: 1990, “Positive Accounting Theory, A Ten Year Perspective”, The Accounting Review (65): 131–156.

  • Weetman, P., E.S. Davie and W. Collins: 1996, “Lobbying on Accounting Issues: Preparer/Iser Im»alance in the Case of the Operating and Financial Review”, Accounting, Auditing and Accounta»ility Journal 9(1): 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R.E.: 1971, “Nondecisions and the Study of Local Politics”, American Political Science Review: 1063–1080.

  • Zmijewski, M. and R. Hagerman: 1981, “An Income Strategy Approach to the Positive Theory of Accounting Standard-Setting/Choice”, Journal of Accounting and Economics (August): 129–149.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilfedder, D., Ó hÓgartaigh, C. The Grasshoppers and the Great Cattle: Participation and Non-Participation in the ASB's Standard-Setting Process. Journal of Management & Governance 2, 287–296 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009911411266

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009911411266

Keywords

Navigation