Skip to main content
Log in

A Broader Look At Medical Futility

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to provide a descriptive theoretical overview of the medical futility debate. I will first argue that quantitative data cannot alone resolve the medical futility debate. I will then examine two aspects of medical futility, which I call the prospective and immediate, respectively. The first involves making prospective factual and value judgments about the efficacy of proposed medical interventions, while the latter involves making value judgments about ongoing medical conditions where the clinical data are clear. At stake is the nature and scope of individual rights. Thus, I maintain there is an undeveloped aspect to the medical futility debate and, briefly, analyze two political perspectives which give rise to different understandings of medical futility. The view that I will defend is that only a system with defined collective goals can accommodate a normative concept of medical futility. These larger questions are the value options which, if unaddressed, may be settled by default of economic grounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Schneiderman LJ, et al. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med 1990; 112: 951–953.

    Google Scholar 

  2. In: re Baby “K,” 16F.3d 590, Petition for rehearing en banc denied, No. 93–1899(L), CA-93-68-A, 28 March (4th Cir. 1994).

  3. In: re The Conservatorship of Helga M. Wanglie, No. PX–91-283 (P. Ct.Minn. Hennepin County June 28, 1991).

  4. Brody BA, Halevy A. Is futility a futile concept? J Med Philos 1995; 20: 124.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Callahan D. Medical futility, medical necessity. Hastings Cent Rep 1991; 21: 34.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tomlinson T, Brody H. Futility and the ethics of resuscitation. JAMA 1990; 264: 1279.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nozick R. Anarchy, State and Utopia, Basic Books, 1974.

  8. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, 1971.

  9. Grumback K, Bodenheimer T. The organization of health care. JAMA 1995; 273: 67.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Angell M. Doctor as double agent. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. Sept 1993: 282.

  11. Kuttner R. Columbia/HCA and the resurgence of the for-profit hospital business. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 362–367.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sulmacy DP. What's so special about medicine? Theor Med 1993; 14: 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Starr P, Zelman W. A bridge to compromise: competition under a budget. Health Aff Supplement 1993: 11.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kassier J. The new health care game. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 433.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Faber-Langendoen K. Medical futility: values, goals, and certainty. J Lab Clin Med 1992; 120(6): 832.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Griener GG. The physician's authority to withhold futile treatment. J Med Philos 1995; 20: 219–222.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jecker NS, Schneiderman LJ. Futility and rationing. Am J Med 1992; 92: 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schneiderman LJ, Jecker NS. Futility in practice. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 440.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shelton, W. A Broader Look At Medical Futility. Theor Med Bioeth 19, 383–400 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009908016744

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009908016744

Keywords

Navigation