Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical Considerations in Psychotherapeutic Systems

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the process of individual psychotherapy, the client and the therapist work together towards clarifying the client's problems, unlocking vicious circles, opening new perspectives and creating a new narrative congruent with the client's experiencing. The real and undeniable situation in individual psychotherapy across different therapeutic systems is that therapists enter the therapeutic encounter equipped with their own vision of humanity and their own particular theory and methods of psychotherapy. Through the differences in power between therapists and clients and the powerful role of language, clients in their dependent position are apt to assimilate the percepts and the ideas of their therapists. Consequently therapists tend to exert a dominant and influential force in their client's lives. This raises a main ethical concern: to what extent do therapists from different therapeutic systems really help clients to recover their freedom to live their lives congruent to their own authentic perceptions and experiences?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. The client will be indicated as “she,” the therapist as “he.” The use of gender is interchangeable.

  2. Craig E. (Ed) 'Psychology for freedom'. Special issue of The Humanistic Psychologist, 16;1, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mook B. Intersubjectivity and narrative structure in family therapy. The Humanistic Psychologist 1989; 17: 251–264.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fromm E. Escape from freedom. New York: Rinehart, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Carvalho R.J. The Humanistic Ethics of Rollo May. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol 32.Nr 1, Winter 1992, pp. 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Derksen J. Psychotherapieen in het Geding. Baarn: Nelissen, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mook B. The significance of hermeneutics to child psychotherapy. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 1991; 16:3, 182–187.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bergsma J. Doctors and Patients, strategies in longterm illness. Kluwer Ac. Press, Dordrecht, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Szasz T. The ethics of psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Op. cit., 6.

  11. Sanders C. Mensvisie en psychotherapie. In: Cassee A.P., Petrie J.F., Sanders C. Psychotherapie en mensvisie. Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper C.F. Ethical issues in Counselling and Psychotherapy: the Background. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, Vol 20,nr 1, Jan. 1992, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brody H. The healer's Power. Yale University Press, 1992.

  14. Op. cit., 12.

  15. Tomm, K. 'Ethical postures in family therapy'. A workshop presentation. Ottawa, 1991.

  16. Conte H.R., Plutchik R. et al. Ethics in the Practice of Psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, Vol XLIII,Nr 1. Jan 1989. pp. 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Op. cit., 5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Owen G. Ethics of Intervention for Change. Australian Psychologist. Vol 21Nr 2 July 1986, pp. 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Op. cit., 18.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jaspers K. Wesen und Kritik der Psychotherapie. Munchen: Piper Bucherei, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Op. cit., 12.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bergsma, J., Mook, B. Ethical Considerations in Psychotherapeutic Systems. Theor Med Bioeth 19, 371–381 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009903929948

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009903929948

Navigation