Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the Relationship Between Instrument and Specimen in Chemical Research

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the design of many modern chemical instruments, information about a specimen is retrieved after the specimen undergoes agitation, manipulation and disturbance of its internal state. But can we retain the traditional ideal that instruments should reveal properties that are definable independently of all modes of detection? In this paper I argue that the capacity of chemical instruments to convert experimental phenomena to information places constraints on the way in which the specimen is characterized. During research, the specimen is defined by those properties which permit its detection. Based on modern instrumentation, this constraint necessitates a conception of the specimen as a reactive system of dynamical properties. The dream of a purely transparent detection process violates the design of chemical instruments. This mutual dependence of instrument and specimen is illustrated by empirical studies of the geometrical configuration of DNA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • R. Ackermann, Data, Instruments, and Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Cassirer, Substance and Function and Einstein's Theory of Relativity, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, NY, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Dickerson, H. Drew and B. Conner, Single-Crystal X-ray Structure Analyses of A, B and Z Helices or One Good Turn Deserved Another. In R. Sarma (Ed.), Biomolecular Stereodynamics, Volume I, Adenine Press, New York, NY, 1981, pp. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Franklin and R. Gosling, Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate. Nature 171: 740–741, 1953a.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Franklin and R. Gosling, Evidence for 2-Chain Helix in Crystalline Structure of Sodium Deoxyribonucleate. Nature 172: 156–157, 1953b.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Frederick, J. Grable, M. Melia, C. Samudzi, L. Jen-Jacobson, B. Wang, P. Greene, H. Boyer and J. Rosenberg, Kinked DNA in Crystalline Complex with EcoRI Endonuclease. Nature 309: 327–330, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Hacking, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Harré, Varieties of Realism, Basil Blackwell Inc., Oxford, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Latour, Science in Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Lelas, Science as Technology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 423–442, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Mann, T. Vickers and W. Gulick, Instrumental Analysis, Harper & Row, New York, NY, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Maroun and W. Olson, DNA, II. Configurational Statistics of Rodlike Chains. Biopolymers 27: 561–584, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.K. Mathews and K.E. van Holde, Biochemistry, The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park, CA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Olson, N. Marky, R. Jernigan and V. Zhurkin, Influence of Fluctuations on DNA Curvature: A Comparsion of Flexible and Static Wedge Models of Intrinsically Bent DNA. Journal of Molecular Biology 232: 530–554, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.-J. Rheinberger, Experiment, Difference, and Writing: I. Tracing Protein Synthesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23: 305–332, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Rothbart and S. Slayden, The Epistemology of a Spectrometer. Philosophy of Science 61: 25–38, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Rothbart and I. Scherer, Kant's Critique of Judgment and the Scientific Investigation of Matter. Hyle 3: 65–80, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sarai, J. Mazur, R. Nussinov and R. Jernigan, Sequence Dependence of DNA Conformational Flexibility. Biochemistry 28: 7842–7849, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Skoog and J. Leary, Principles and Instrumental Analysis, Fourth Edition. Saunders College Publishing, Fort Worth, TX, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Scrinivasan, R. Torres, W. Clark and W. Olson, Base Sequence Effects in Double Helical DNA. I. Potential Energy Estimates of Local Base Morphology. Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics 5: 459–493, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Strobel and W. Heineman, Chemical Instrumentation: A Systematic Approach, Third Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Watson and F. Crick, The Structure of DNA. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 18: 123–131, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Zakrzewska, Static and Dynamic Conformational Properties of AT Sequence in B-DNA. Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics 9: 681–693.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, MSN: 3F1, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 22030, U.S.A. E-mail

    Daniel Rothbart

Authors
  1. Daniel Rothbart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rothbart, D. On the Relationship Between Instrument and Specimen in Chemical Research. Foundations of Chemistry 1, 255–268 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009902306647

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009902306647

Keywords

Search

Navigation