Journal of Economic Growth

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 185–206 | Cite as

Schumpeterian Entrepreneurs Meet Engel's Law: The Impact of Inequality on Innovation-Driven Growth

  • Josef Zweimüller


This article analyzes the impactof inequality on growth when consumers have hierarchic preferencesand technical progress is driven by innovations. With hierarchicpreferences, the poor consume predominantly basic goods, whereasthe rich consume also luxury goods. Inequality has an impacton growth because it affects the level and the dynamics of aninnovator's demand. It is shown that redistribution from veryrich to very poor consumers can be beneficial for growth. Ingeneral, the growth effect depends on the nature of redistribution.Due to a demand externality from R&D activities, multipleequilibria are possible.

innovation growth inequality hierarchic demand multiple equilibria 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aghion, P., and P. Bolton. (1997). “A Trickle-down Theory of Growth and Development with Debt Overhang,” Review of Economic Studies 64, 151-172.Google Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. (1992). “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction,” Econometrica 60, 323-351.Google Scholar
  3. Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alesina, A., and D. Rodrik. (1994). “Distributive Politics and Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 465-490.Google Scholar
  5. Baland, J. M., and D. Ray. (1991). “Why Does Asset Inequality Affect Unemployment? A Study of the Demand Composition Problem,” Journal of Development Economics 35, 69-92.Google Scholar
  6. Banerjee, A. V., and A. F. Newman. (1993). “Occupational Choice and the Process of Development,” Journal of Political Economy 101, 274-299.Google Scholar
  7. Barro, R. (1999). “Inequality, Growth, and Investment,” NBER Working Paper 7038.Google Scholar
  8. Benabou, R. (1996). “Inequality and Growth.” In B. S. Bernanke and J. J. Rotemberg (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1996. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bertola, G. (1993). “Factor Shares and Savings in Endogenous Growth,” American Economic Review 83, 1184-1198.Google Scholar
  10. Bertola, G. (forthcoming). “Macroeconomics of Distribution and Growth.” In A. B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution. Amsterdam North-Holland.Google Scholar
  11. Bils, M., and P. J. Klenow. (2000). “Quantifying Quality Growth,” Mimeo, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  12. Bourguignon, F. (1990). “Growth and Inequality in the Dual Model of Development: The Role of Demand Factors,” Review of Economic Studies 57, 215-228.Google Scholar
  13. Chou, C. F., and G. Talmain. (1996). “Redistribution and Growth: Pareto Improvements,” Journal of Economic Growth 1, 505-523.Google Scholar
  14. Clarke, R. (1995). “More Evidence on Income Distribution and Growth,” Journal of Development Economics 47, 403-427.Google Scholar
  15. Deaton, A. S., and J. Muellbauer. (1980). Economics and Consumer Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Deininger, K., and L. Squire. (1998). “New Ways Looking at Old Issues: Inequality and Growth,” Journal of Development Economics 57, 259-287.Google Scholar
  17. Eswaran, M., and A. Kotwal. (1993). “A Theory of Real Wage Growth in LDCs,” Journal of Development Economics 42, 243-269.Google Scholar
  18. Falkinger, J. (1994). “An Engelian Model of Growth and Innovation with Hierarchic Demand and Unequal Incomes,” Ricerche Economiche 48, 123-139.Google Scholar
  19. Falkinger, J., and J. Zweimüller. (1996). “The Cross-Country Engel-Curve for Product Diversification,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 7, 79-97.Google Scholar
  20. Galor, O., and J. Zeira. (1993). “Income Distribution and Macroeconomics,” Review of Economic Studies 60, 35-52.Google Scholar
  21. Glass, A. J. (1996). “Income Distribution and Quality Improvement,” Mimeo, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  22. Grossman, G., and E. Helpman. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jackson, L. F. (1984). “Hierarchic Demand and the Engel-Curve for Variety,” Review of Economics and Statistics 66, 8-15.Google Scholar
  24. Krugman, P. (1991). “History Versus Expectations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 651-667.Google Scholar
  25. Li, C. W. (1996). “Inequality and Growth: A Schumpteterian Perspective,” Mimeo, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  26. Matsuyama, K. (1991). “Increasing Returns, Industrialization, and the Indeterminacy of Equilibrium,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 617-650.Google Scholar
  27. Matsuyama, K. (1993). “The Market Size, Entrepreneurship and the Big Push,” Journal of the Japanese and the International Economies, 347-364.Google Scholar
  28. Murphy, K. M., A. Schleifer, and R. Vishny. (1989a). “Income Distribution, Market Size, and Industrialization,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 537-564.Google Scholar
  29. Murphy, K. M., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. (1989b). “Industrialization and the Big Push,” Journal of Political Economy 97, 537-564.Google Scholar
  30. Perotti, R. (1996). “Growth, Income Distribution, and Democracy: What the Data Say,” Journal of Economic Growth 1, 149-187.Google Scholar
  31. Persson, T., and G. Tabellini. (1994). “Is Inequality Harmful for Growth?,” American Economic Review 84, 600-621.Google Scholar
  32. Romer, P. M. (1987). “Growth Based on Increasing Returns due to Specialization,” American Economic Review 77, 56-62.Google Scholar
  33. Romer, P. M. (1990). “Endogenous Technical Change,” Journal of Political Economy 98, S71-S102.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. (1943). “Industrialization in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe,” Economic Journal 53, 202-211.Google Scholar
  35. Young, A. (1993). “Substitution and Complementarity in Endogenous Innovation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 775-807.Google Scholar
  36. Zweimüller, J., and J. K. Brunner. (1996). “Heterogeneous Consumers, Vertical Product Differentiation, and the Rate of Innovation,” Working Paper No. 9604, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna.Google Scholar
  37. Zweimüller, J., and J. K. Brunner. (1998). “Innovation and Growth with Rich and Poor Consumers,” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 1855, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josef Zweimüller
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of ZurichZurich
  2. 2.IZA-BonnCEPR-LondonZurich

Personalised recommendations