Skip to main content
Log in

Low Incidence of Significant Valvar Insufficiency Following Retrograde Aortic Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Young Patients

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The incidence of significant valvar insufficiency at late (>6 month) follow-up was retrospectively evaluated in 27 young patients (age 4.0–18.0 years) undergoing 29 ablation procedures via the retrograde aortic approach for left-sided accessory connections in whom pre-ablation and post-ablation echocardiograms were available for review. Valvar insufficiency was graded using color flow techniques as absent, trivial, mild, moderate, or severe by blinded reviewers. Ablation was acutely successful via the retrograde approach in 25 of 29 procedures among these 27 patients. Successful ablation was ultimately achieved in all 27 patients.

At baseline, 7 patients had evidence of trivial or mild mitral insufficiency, and no patient had aortic insufficiency. Three patients had evidence of impaired left ventricular systolic performance in the presence of manifest pre-excitation. At follow-up, pre-existing mitral insufficiency resolved in 5/7 patients, and persisted in 2 patients. New mitral insufficiency was evident in 3 patients, and new aortic insufficiency was transiently evident in 1 patient following ablation (all trivial). Institutional experience (mean rank 10 cases vs. 33 cases, p < .0005), and lower patient weight (29.7 vs. 56.3 kilograms, p = .01) were the only factors associated with the development of new valvar insufficiency. Valvar insufficiency could not be detected by careful auscultation in any patient and was deemed clinically insignificant in all patients.

We conclude that ablation of left-sided accessory connections can be performed via the retrograde aortic approach without creating clinically significant valvar insufficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jackman WM, Wang X, Friday KJ, Roman CA, Moulton KP, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Twidale N, Hazlitt HA, Prior MI, Margolis PD, Calame JD, Overholt ED, Lazzara R. Catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) by radiofrequency current. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1605–1611.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kugler JD, Danford DA, Deal BJ, Gillette PC, Perry JC, Silka MJ, Van Hare GF, Walsh EP. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for tachyarrhythmias in children and adolescents. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1481–1487.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Van Hare GF, Lesh MD, Scheinman M, Langberg JJ. Percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation for supraventricular arrhythmias in children. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17: 1613–1620.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dick M II, O'Connor BK, Serwer GA, LeRoy S, Armstrong B. Use of radiofrequency current to ablate accessory connections in children. Circulation 1991;84:2318–2324.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Minich LL, Snider AR, Dick M. Doppler detection of valvular regurgitation after radiofrequency ablation of accessory connections. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:116–117.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vora AM, McMahon S, Jazayeri MR, Dhala A. Ablation of atrial insertion sites of left-sided accessory pathways in children: Efficacy and safety of transseptal versus transaortic approach. Pediatr Cardiol 1997;18:332–338.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frias PA, Kavanaugh-McHugh A, Fish FA. Left ventricular dysfunction in young patients: Evidence for ventricular remodeling. PACE 1997;20(4),part II:1088(abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hindricks G. The Multicentre European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS): Complications of radiofrequency catheter ablation of arrhythmias. Eur Heart J 1993;14:1644–1653.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seifert MJ, Morady F, Calkins HG, Langberg JJ. Aortic leaflet perforation during radiofrequency ablation. PACE 1991;14,part I:1582–1585.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lau YR, Case CL, Gillette PC, Shuler CO, Fyfe DA, Knick BJ, Buckles DS. Frequency of atrioventricular valve dysfunction after radiofrequency catheter ablation via the atrial approach. Am J Cardiol 1994;74:617–618.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brand A, Dollberg S, Keren A. The prevalence of valvular regurgitation in children with structurally normal hearts: A color doppler echocardiographic study. Am Heart J 1992; 123:177–180.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshida K, Yoshikawa J, Shakudo M, Akasaka T, Jyo Y, Takao S, Shiratori K, Koizumi K, Okumachi F, Kato H, Fukaya T. Color Doppler evaluation of valvular regurgitation in normal subjects. Circulation 1988;78:840–847.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Natale A, Wathen M, Yee R, Wolfe K, Klein G. Atrial and ventricular approaches for radiofrequency catheter ablation of left-sided accessory pathways. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70:114–116.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saul JP, Hulse E, De W, Weber AT, Rhodes LA, Lock JE, Walsh EP. Catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways in young patients: Use of long vascular sheaths, the transseptal approach and a retrograde left posterior parallel approach. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:571–583.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lesh MD, Van Hare GF, Scheinman MM, Ports TA, Epstein LA. Comparison of the retrograde and transseptal methods for ablation of left free wall accessory pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:542–549.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frias, P.A., Taylor, M.B., Kavanaugh-McHugh, A. et al. Low Incidence of Significant Valvar Insufficiency Following Retrograde Aortic Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Young Patients. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 3, 181–185 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009885917479

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009885917479

Navigation