Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Atrial Pressure Increase on Effective Refractory Period and Vulnerability to Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Lone Atrial Fibrillation

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: There is evidence suggesting that atrial fibrillation (AF) may be induced by acute increase of atrial pressure. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of alterations in atrial pressure, induced by varying the atrioventricular (AV) interval, on atrial refractoriness, and on the frequency of induction of (AF), in patients with a history of lone atrial fibrillation (LAF).

Methods and Results: Twenty-five patients were included in this study. The patients were divided in two groups: the LAF group, and the control group. None of the patients in either group had organic heart disease. Effective refractory period (ERP) and duration of atrial extrastimulus electrogram (A2) were measured at two right atrial sites (high lateral wall, atrial appendage) during AV pacing (cycle length: 500 msec) with different AV intervals. Peak, minimal and mean atrial pressure increased from 8.57 ± 2.37 to 18.14 ± 4.74 mm Hg, 2 ± 2.23 to 5.14 ± 2.60 mm Hg (p = 0.0001) and from 4.28 ± 1.6 mm Hg to 9.77 ± 2.9 mm Hg (p = 0.001), respectively during AV interval modification. During lateral and atrial appendage pacing, with a progressive decrease of AV interval to 160, 100, 80, 40, 0 msec, the ERP, the dispersion of ERP, functional refractory period (FRP), A2 and latency period (LP) did not change significantly, in both groups. The frequency of induction of AF was not statistically different in both lateral atrial wall and appendage, during pacing in different AV intervals.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that alterations in the intraatrial pressure does not have important effects on atrial refractoriness and does not increase vulnerability to AF in patients with a history of LAF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lerman BB, Burkhoff D, Yue DT, Sagawa K. Mechanoelectrical feedback: Independent role of preload and contractility in modulation of canine ventricular excitability. J Clin Invest 1982;76:1843–1850.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lakatta EG. Starling' law of the heart is explained by an intimate interaction of muscle length and myofilament calcium activation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;10:1157–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee KS, Marban E, Tsien RW. Inactivation of calcium channels in mammalian heart cells: Joint dependence on membrane potential and intracellular calcium. J Physiol 1985;354:395–411.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Di Francesco D, Mc Naughton DA. The effects of calcium on outward membrane currents on the cardiac Purkinje fibre. J Physiol 1979;289:347–373.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaseda S, Zipes DP. Contraction-excitation feedback in the atria: A cause of changes in refractoriness. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:1327–1336.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klein LS, Miles WM, Zipes DP. Effect of atrioventricular interval during pacing or reciprocating tachycardia on atrial size, pressure, and refractory period. Contraction-excitation feedback in human atrium. Circulation 1990;82:60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jajal S, Williams GR, Mann DE, Reiter MJ. Effect of acute ventricular dilatation on fibrillation thresholds in the isolated rabbit heart. Am J Physiol 1992;263:H1306–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smeets JL, Allessie MA, Lammers WJ, Bonne FIH, Hollen J. The wavelength of the cardiac impulse and reentrant arrhythmias in isolated rabbit atrium. The role of the heart rate, autonomic transmitters, temperature, and potassium. Circ Res 1986;58:96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Allessie MA, Rensma PL, Lammers WJEP, Kirchoff CJHJ. The role of refractoriness, conduction velocity, and wavelength in initiation of atrial fibrillation in normal conscious dogs. In: Attuel P, Coumel P, Janse MJ. The Atrium in Health and Disease. Mount Kisco, NY: Future Publishing Co, 1989:271–274.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Calkins H, El-Atassi R, Leon A, Kalbfleisch S, Borganelli M, Langberg J, Morady F. Effect of the atrioventricular relationship on atrial refractoriness in humans. PACE. 1992;15:771–778.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Calkins H, El-Atassi R, Kalbfleisch S, Langberg J, Morady F. Effects of an acute increase in atrial pressure on atrial refractoriness in humans. PACE. 1992;15:1674–1680.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ellenbogen KA, Stambler BS, Wood MA, Mohanty PK. Examination of mechano-electrical feedback in the transplanted human heart. Am J Card 1995;76:51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ravelli F, Allessie M. Effects of atrial dilatation on refractory period and vulnerability to atrial fibrillation in the isolated Langendorf-perfused rabbit heart. Circulation 1997;96:1686–1695

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Efremidis, M., Sideris, A., Prappa, E. et al. Effect of Atrial Pressure Increase on Effective Refractory Period and Vulnerability to Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Lone Atrial Fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 3, 307–310 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009875602056

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009875602056

Navigation