Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Noninvasive Transesophageal Signal Averaging Technique for Detection of Sinus Node Electrogram

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have developed a noninvasive transesophageal signal averaging technique for direct recording of sinus node electrogram. In this study, sinus node electrograms were recorded from 106 of 138 patients (77%), comparable to that (46%) recorded by conventional transesophageal technique, 59 were male and 47 were female ranging in age from 10–74 years (mean 44.2±12.4 years). The signals from lead I, surface averaged lead and esophagus averaged lead were amplified (up to 100μV/cm), filtered (0.1–50Hz), AD converted to 16-bit accuracy at a sampling rate of 2KHz and averaged by using the three channel low-noise amplifier. The signal averaged esophageal sinus node potentials are deflections of low-amplitude and low-frequency preceding the P wave. Two morphologies, the domed wave (64 of 106 patients, 60%) and the smooth upstroke slope (42 of 106 patients, 40%), can be seen. The directly recorded sinoatrial conduction time was 82.3 ±18.6msec (mean±2 SD), ranged from 23–112msec, amplitude was 3.8–27.7μV and dv/dt was 0.42–1.92mV/sec. The sinoatrial conduction time recorded by the transesophageal catheter technique was comparable to that (80.4±18.1msec) recorded by the transvenous catheter method perfectly. We think that signal averaged sinus node electrogram could be recorded in sinus rhythm in most patients with normal sinus node function and proper filter settings, high amplification and anti-drift technique are important in recording signal averaged esophageal sinus node electrogram.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cramer M, Siegal M, Bigger JT Jr, Hoffman BF. Characteristics of extracellular potentials recorded from the sinoatrial pacemaker of the rabbit. Circ Res 1977;41:292–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berbari EJ, Lazzara R, Samet P, Scherlag BJ. Noninvasive Technique for detection of electrical activity during the P-R segment. Circulation 1973;58:1005–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Valverde ER, Quinteiro RA, Bertran GC, Arini PD, Glenny P, Biagetti MO. Influence of filtering techniques on the time-domain analysis of signal-averaged P wave electrocardiogram. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998;99:253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Juillard A, Guillerm F, Chuong HV, Barrillon A, Gerbaux A. Sinus node electrogram recording in 59 patients. Comparison with simultaneous estimation of sinoatrial conduction using premature atrial stimulation. Br Heart J 1983;50:75–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Steinbeck G, Allessie MA, Bonke FIM, Lammers WJEP. Sinus node response to premature atrial stimulation in the rabbit studied with multiple microelectrode impalements. Circ Res 1978;43:695–704.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hariman RJ, Krongrad E, Boxer RA, Weiss MB, Steeg CN, Hoffman BF. Method for recording electrical activity of the sinoatrial node and automatic atrial foci during cardiac catheterization in human subjects. Am J Cardiol 1980;45:775–781.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reiffel JA, Gang ES, Gliklich J, Weiss MB, Davis JC, Patton JN, Bigger JT Jr. The human sinus node electrogram: a transvenous catheter technique and a comparison of directly measured and indirectly estimated sinoatrial conduction time in adults. Circulation 1980;62:1324–1334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gang ES, Oseran DS, Mandel WJ, Peter T. Sinus node electrogram in patients with the hypersensitive carotid sinus syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:1484–1490.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reiffel JA, Gang ES, Livelli FD, Gliklich J, Bigger JT Jr. Clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics of sinoatrial entrance block evaluated by direct sinus node electrography: prevalence, relation to antegrade sinoatrial conduction time, and relevance to sinus node disease. Am Heart J 1981;102:1011–1014.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gomes JAC, Kang PS, El Sherif N. The sinus node electrogram in patients with and without sick sinus syndrome: techniques and correlation between directly measured and indirectly estimated sinoatrial conduction time. Circulation 1982;66:864–873.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reiffel JA, Gang ES, Livelli FD, Gliklich J, Bigger JT Jr. Indirectly estimated sinoatrial conduction time by the atrial conduction time by the atrial premature stimulus technique: patterns of error and the degree of associated inaccuracy as assessed by direct sinus node electrography. Am Heart J 1983;106:459–463.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Asseman P, Berzin B, Desry D, Vilarem D, Durand P, Delmotte C, Sarkis EH, Lekiffre J, Thery C. Persistent sinus nodal electrograms during abnormally prolonged postpacing atrial pauses in sick sinus syndrome in humans: sinoatrial block vs overdrive suppression. Circulation 1983;68:33–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mandal W, Hayakawa H, Danzig R, Marcus HS. Evaluation of sino-atrial function in man by overdrive suppression. Circulation 1971;44:59–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Narula OS, Shantha N, Vasquez M, Towne WD, Linhart JW. A new method for measurement of sinoatrial conduction time. Circulation 1978;58:706–714.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Strauss HC, Saroff AL, Bigger JT Jr, Giardina EGV. Premature atrial stimulation as a key to the understanding of sinoatrial conduction in man. Presentation of date and critical review of the literature. Circulation 1973;47:86–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hariman RJ, Krongrad E, Boxer RA, Bowman FO Jr, Malm JR, Hoffman BF. Method for recording electrograms of the sinoatrial node during cardiac surgery in man. Circulation 1980;61:1024–1029.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Padeletti L, Michelucci A, Fradella GA, Monizzi D, Fantini F. The effects of atropine on sinoatrial conduction time directly measured from sinus node electrogram. A comparison with results furnished by indirect methods. Eur Heart J 1984;5:27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Strauss HC, Grant AO, Schienman MM, Wallace AG. The use of cardiac stimulation techniques to evaluate sinus node dysfunction. In: Little RC, ed. Physiology of atrial pacemakers and conductive tissues. Mount Kisco: Futura Publishing Company, 1980:339–365.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brethardt G, Seipel L. Comparative study of two methods of estimating sinoatrial conduction time in man. Am J Cardiol 1978;42:965–972.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cramer M, Hariman RJ, Boxer R, Hoffman BF. Electrograms from the canine sinoatrial pacemaker recorded in vitro and in situ. Am J Cardiol 1978;42: 939–946.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rakovec P, Jakopin J, Rode P, Kenda MF, Horav MF. Clinical comparison of indirectly and directly determined sinoatrial conduction time. Am Heart J 1981;102:292–294.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Juillard A, Guillerm F, Chirong HV, Barrillon A, Gerbeaux A. Sinus node electrogram recording on 59 patients. Comparison with simultaneous estimation of sinoatrial conduction using premature atrial stimulation. Br Heart J 1983;50:75–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reiffel JA, Bigger JT Jr, Ferrick K, Livelli FD, Gliklich JI, Wang P, Bosner R. Sinus node echoes and concealed conduction: additional sinus node electrography. J Electrocardiol 1985;18:259–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Asseman P, Berzin B, Desry D, Bauchart JJ, Reade R, Leroy O, Poncelet P, Lekieffre J, Thery C. Postextrasystolic sinoatrial exit block in human sick sinus syndrome: Demonstration by direct recording of sinus node electrograms. Am Heart J 1991;122:1633–1643.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haberl R, Steinbeck G, Luderitz B. Comparison between intracellular and extracellular current recording of sinus node activity for evaluation of sinoatrial conduction of sinoatrial conduction time. Circulation 1984;70:760–767.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Wuhan General Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R. China

    Shifang Ding MD, Dabo Ma MD & Chi Guo MS

Authors
  1. Shifang Ding MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dabo Ma MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chi Guo MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ding, S., Ma, D. & Guo, C. A Noninvasive Transesophageal Signal Averaging Technique for Detection of Sinus Node Electrogram. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 4, 225–230 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009869713743

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009869713743

Search

Navigation