Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of Success in Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Flutter

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter at the isthmus between the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava is established. However in selected patients, the creation of a continuous linear lesion at the targeted isthmus requires a lengthened procedure or is not feasible at all and atrial flutter recurrences are common.

In a retrospective analysis, we found that an intraoperatively determined distance between the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava of <.2.5 cm is an independent predictor of a lengthened or failed ablation procedure. Additional equipment, e.g., long introducer sheaths, adapted ablation catheter design, or irrigated tip ablation, as well as alternative ablation approaches, e.g., linear lesions between the tricuspid annulus and Eustachian ridge, have been invented in order to increase the acute success rate or decrease fluoroscopy and procedure time.

In a prospective study on the effects of various conduction properties at the isthmus between tricuspid annulus and inferior vena cava following radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter, we showed previously that others than a complete bidirectional conduction block predicts a high recurrence rate of atrial flutter. For determination of transisthmal conduction properties following ablation, established mapping approaches are documentation of double potentials at the ablation line and right atrial activation sequence following posteroseptal and low lateral right atrial pacing. Novel threedimensional mapping systems, i.e., Carto® and EnSite®, may further enhance the accuracy of conventional mapping techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saoudi N, Atallah G, Kirkorian G, et al. Catheter ablation of the atrial myocardium in human type I atrial flutter. Circulation 1990;81:762–771.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feld GK, Fleck RP, Chen PS, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of human type I atrial flutter: Identification of a critical zone in the reentrant circuit by endocardial mapping techniques. Circulation 1992;86: 1233–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cosio FG, Lopez-Gil M, Goicolea A, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the inferior vena cava-tricuspid valve isthmus in common atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1993;71: 705–709.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kirkorian G, Moncada E, Chevalier P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter: Efficacy of an anatomically guided approach. Circulation 1994;90:2804–2814.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Calkins H, Leon AR, Deam AG, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial flutter using radiofrequency energy. Am J Cardiol 1994;73:353–356.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Steinberg JS, Prasher S, Zelenkofske S, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter: Procedural success and long-term outcome. Am Heart J 1995;130:85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Poty H, Saoudi N, Aziz AA, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of type 1 atrial flutter: Circulation 1995;92: 1389–1392.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer B, Jais P, Shah D, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter in 200 patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996;7:1226–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen SA, Chiang CE, Wu TJ, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter: Comparison of electrophysiologically guided focal ablation technique and linear ablation technique. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:860–868.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tai CT, Chen SA, Chiang CE, et al. Electrophysiologic characteristics and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with clockwise atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997;8:24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schumacher B, Lewalter T, Wolpert et al. Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998; 9:S139-S145.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt T, Schumacher B, Lewalter T, et al. Predictive value of various parameters for a successful catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. Eur Heart J 1998;19:542 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jais P, Haissaguerre M, Shah DC, et al. Successful irrigatedtip catheter ablation of atrial flutter resistant to conventional radiofrequency ablation. Circulation 1998;98:835–838.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nakagawa H, Lazzara R, Kasthgir T, et al. Role of the tricuspid annulus and the eustachian valve/ridge on atrial flutter. Circulation 1996;94:407–424.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schumacher B, Lewalter T, Wolpert C, et al. Linear lesion between the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava or the Eustachian ridge: Which is the preferrable approach for ablation of atrial flutter? J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;30:401 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Poty H, Klug D, Scanu F, et al. Randomized comparison of two targets in ablation of common atrial flutter. Eur Heart J 1997;18:150 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schumacher B, Pfeiffer D, Tebbenjohanns J, et al. Acute and long-term effects of consecutive radiofrequency applications on conduction properties of the subeustachian isthmus in type I atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998;9: 152–163.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cauchemez B, Haissaguerre M, Fisher B, et al. Electrophysiological effects of catheter ablation of inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus isthmus in common atrial flutter. Circulation 1996;93:284–294.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Poty H, Saoudi N, Nair M, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter: Further insights into the various types of isthmus block. Application to the ablation during sinus rhythm. Circulation 1996;94:3204–3213.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schwartzman D, Callans DJ, Gottlieb CD, et al. Conduction block in the inferior vena caval-tricuspid valve isthmus: Association with outcome of radiofrequency ablation of type I atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1519–1531.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schumacher, B., Wolpert, C., Lewalter, T. et al. Predictors of Success in Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Flutter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 4 (Suppl 1), 121–125 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009851119938

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009851119938

Navigation