Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Spatial Dispersion of Atrial Refractoriness and Atrial Fibrillation Vulnerability

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The local dispersion of conduction and refractoriness has been considered essential for induction of atrial arrhythmias. This study sought to determine whether a difference of refractoriness and vulnerability for induction of atrial fibrillation between trabeculated and smooth as well as high and low right atrium may contribute to initiation of atrial fibrillation in dogs.

In 14 healthy mongrel dogs weighing 22.4 ± 1 kg, closed-chest endocardial programmed stimulation was performed from four distinct right atrial sites. Atrial refractory periods and vulnerability for induction of atrial fibrillation or premature atrial complexes were determined during a basic cycle length of 400 and 300 ms and an increasing pacing current strength.

For a pacing cycle length of 300ms, atrial refractory periods were longer on the smooth, as compared to the trabeculated right atrium (102 ± 25 vs. 97 ± 17ms, p < 0.05), whereas for a pacing cycle length of 400ms, there was no significant difference. The duration of the vulnerability zone for induction of atrial fibrillation was longer on the smooth right atrium, for a cycle length of both 400 ms (40 ± 30 vs. 31 ± 22 ms; p < 0.05) and 300 ms (33 ± 25 vs. 23 ± 21 ms; p < 0.01). When comparing high and low right atrium, refractory periods were longer on the the low right atrium, for a cycle length of both 400 ms (111 ± 23 vs. 94 ± 24ms; p < 0.01) and 300 ms (104 ± 20 vs. 96 ± 23ms; p < 0.01). For a pacing cycle length of 300 ms, the duration of the atrial fibrillation vulnerability zone was longer for the high, as compared to the low right atrium (34 ± 22 vs. 22 ± 22, p < 0.01). Seven dogs with easily inducible episodes of atrial fibrillation demonstrated significantly shorter refractory periods as compared to 7 non-vulnerable dogs, regardless of pacing site and current strength.

In conclusion, significant differences in refractoriness and vulnerability for induction of atrial fibrillation can be observed in the area of the crista terminalis in healthy dogs. Thus, local anatomic factors may play a role in the initiation of atrial fibrillation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moe GK. On the multiple wavelet hypothesis of atrial fibrillation. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1962;140:183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roithinger FX, SippensGroenewegen A, Karch MR, et al. Organized activation during atrial fibrillation in man: Endocardial and electrocardiographic manifestations. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998;9:451–461.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haft JI, Lau SH, Stein E, et al. Atrial fibrillation produced by atrial stimulation. Circulation 1968;37:70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buxton AE, Waxman HL, Marchlinski FE, et al. Atrial conduction: Effects of extrastimuli with and without atrial dysrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 1984;54:755–761.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cosio FG, Palacios J, Vidal JM, et al. Electrophysiologic studies in atrial fibrillation: Slow conduction of premature impulses: a possible manifestation of the background for reentry. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:122–130.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Papageorgiou P, Monahan K, Boyle NG, et al. Site-dependent intra-atrial conduction delay. Relationship to initiation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1996;94:384–389.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Satoh T, Zipes DP. Unequal atrial stretch in dogs increases dispersion of refractoriness conducive to developing atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996;7:833–842.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Becker AE. Atrial anatomy: relationship to atrial flutter. In: Waldo AL, Touboul P, eds. Atrial flutter: Advances in mechanisms and management. Armonk, N.Y.: Futura Publishing Co., 1996:13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman HS, Sinha B, Tun A, et al. Zones of atrial vulnerability. Relationships to basic cycle length. Circulation 1996; 94:1456–1464.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saffitz JE, Kanter HL, Green KG, et al. Tissue-specific determinants of anisotropic conduction velocity in canine atrial and ventricular myocardium. Circ Res 1994;74:1065–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jais P, Haissaguerre M, Shah DC, et al. Regional disparities of endocardial atrial activation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. PACE 1996;19:1998–2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. lSpach MS, Miller WT, Geselowitz DB, et al. The discontinuous nature of propagation in normal canine cardiac muscle–Evidence for recurrent discontinuities of intracellular resistance that affect the membrane currents. Circ Res 1981;48:39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spach MS, Dolber PC, Heidlage JF. Influence of the passive anisotropic porperties on directional differences in propagation following modification of the sodium conductance in human atrial muscle: A model of reentry based on anisotropic discontinuous propagation. Circ Res 1981;48:39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gaspo R, Bosch RF, Talajic M, et al. Functional mechanisms underlying tachycardia-induced sustained atrial fibrillation in a chronic dog model. Circulation 1997;96:4027–4035.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fareh S, Villemaire C, Nattel S. Importance of refractoriness heterogeneity in the enhanced vulnerability to atrial fibrillation induction caused by tachycardia-induced atrial electrical remodeling. Circulation 1998;98:2202–2209.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tse HF, Lau CP, Ayers GM. Heterogeneous changes in electrophysiologic properties in the paroxysmal and chronically fibrillating human atrium. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1999;10:125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Misier AR, Opthof T, van Hemel NM, et al. Increased disperison of “refractoriness” in patients with idiopathic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19: 1531–1535.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Papageorgiou P, Anselme F, Kirchhof CJ, et al. Coronary sinus pacing prevents the induction of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1997;96:1893–1898.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prakash A, Saksena S, Hill M, et al. Acute effects of dual-site right atrial pacing in patients with spontaneous and inducible atrial flutter and fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1007–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yu WC, Chen SA, Tai CT, et al. Effects of different atrial pacing modes on atrial electrophysiology. Implicating the mechanism of biatrial pacing in prevention of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1997;96:2992–2996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prakash A, Delfaut P, Krol RB, Saksena S. Regional right and left atrial activation patterns during single-and dual-site atrial pacing in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:1197–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wu TJ, Yashima M, Xie F, et al. Role of pectinate muscle bundles in the generation and maintenance of intra-atrial reentry. Potential implications for the mechanism of conversion between atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Circ Res 1998;83:448–462.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Golderger JJ, Smith JR, Kim YH, et al. Effect of increased drive-train stimulus intensity on dispersion of ventricular refractoriness. Circulation 1995;92:875–880.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Langberg J, Calkins H, Sousa J, et al. Effects of drive train stimulus intensity on ventricular refractoriness in humans. Circulations 1991;84:181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Buxton AE, Marchlinski FE, Miller JM, et al. The human atrial strength-interval relation. Influence of cycle length and procainamide. Circulation 1989;79:271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Morillo CA, Klein GJ, Jones DL, et al. Chronic rapid atrial pacing. Structural, functional, and electrophysiological characteristics of a new model of sustained atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1995;91:1588–1595.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rensma PL, Allessie MA, Lammers WJ, et al. Length of excitation wave and susceptibility to reentrant atrial arrhythmias in normal conscious dogs. Circ Res 1988;62:395–410.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li H, Hare J, Mughal K, et al. Distribution of atrial electrogram types during atrial fibrillation: Effect of rapid atrial pacing and intercaval junction ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1713–1721.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Medicine and Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

    Franz X. Roithinger, Martin R. Karch, Paul R. Steiner, Arne SippensGroenewegen & Michael D. Lesh

Authors
  1. Franz X. Roithinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin R. Karch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul R. Steiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arne SippensGroenewegen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael D. Lesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roithinger, F.X., Karch, M.R., Steiner, P.R. et al. The Spatial Dispersion of Atrial Refractoriness and Atrial Fibrillation Vulnerability. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 3, 311–319 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009844132736

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009844132736

Search

Navigation