Skip to main content
Log in

The relative effectiveness of superphosphate and rock phosphate for soils where vertical and lateral leaching of phosphate occurs

  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laboratory studies have shown that up to 70% reactive rock phosphate dissolves in three soil types found in the high rainfall (> 800 mm annual average) area of south-western Australia. Three field experiments were undertaken on these soils to compare reactive apatite rock phosphate from North Carolina (NCRP) with single superphosphate (SSP) as fertilizers for subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum) pasture. Vertical leaching of phosphorus (P) occurs in one soil, a deep, very sandy, acid peaty sand. Lateral leaching of P occurs in the second soil, a shallow (3 cm) sand over a slowly permeable sandy clay loam. No leaching of P occurs in the third soil, a uniform, permeable red sandy loam with a moderate capacity to sorb P. All the soils remained moist to very wet for the 6 to 8 month growing season. Fertilizers were applied once only to different plots over a four-year period (1992 to 1995). Each year fertilizer effectiveness was determined relative to the effectiveness of freshly-applied (current) SSP using yield and P content of dried clover herbage and bicarbonate-soluble P extracted from the soil (soil test P) as indices of effectiveness.

For the two P leaching soils, NCRP was less, equally, or more effective than current SSP in different years. This variation is attributed to the different extents of leaching of P from current SSP in different years which experienced different amounts of rainfall and associated leaching. For the non-P leaching soil, the effectiveness of current NCRP and the residual effectiveness of NCRP were from 5 to 80% the values for current SSP. When measured using soil test P, current NCRP and residual NCRP varied from 40% as effective, to equally or 30% more effective as current SSP at one site, but were about 20% as effective at the other two sites. For the two P leaching soils in some years, the residual value of RP was higher than that of current SSP, presumably due to the rapid leaching of water-soluble P from the SSP. As measured using yield, P content and soil test P, the relative effectiveness of SSP consistently decreased with increasing time from application; the decreases were much less obvious for NCRP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen DG & Jeffery RC (1990) Methods of analysis of phosphorus in Western Australian soils. Report of Investigation No 37. Chemistry Centre of Western Australia, East Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston AM & Chin KW (1974) Rock phosphate and superphosphate as sources of phosphorus for subterranean clover on an acid sandy soil. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 14: 358–361

    Google Scholar 

  • AOAC (1975) Official Methods of Analysis. 12 edn. Assoc. Offic. Agric. Chem., Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow NJ & Campbell NA (1972) Methods of measuring residual value of fertilizers. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 12: 501–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhisel R & Bertsch PM (1982) Aluminium. In: AL Page (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. pp 275–300. Am Soc Agron Mono 9, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolland MDA (1996) Effectiveness of Ecophos compared with single and coastal superphosphates. Fert Res 45: 37–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolland MDA & Bowden JW (1986) Summary of long–term rock phosphate experiments in south–western Australia. J Aust Instit Agric Sci 52: 227–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolland MDA & Gilkes RJ (1990) Rock phosphates are not effective fertilizers in Western Australian soils: a review of one hundred years of research. Fert Res 22: 79–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolland MDA, Baker MJ & Lunt RJ (1987) Effectiveness of superphosphate and crandallite–millisite rock phosphate on a deep, very sandy soil as assessed by plant growth and soil extractable phosphate. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 27: 647–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolland MDA, Clarke MF & Boetel FC (1995a) Comparison of single and coastal superphosphate for subterranean clover on phosphorus leaching soils. Fert Res 40: 49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolland MDA, Clarke MF & Yeates JS (1995b) Effectiveness of rock phosphate, coastal superphosphate and single superphosphate for pasture on deep sandy soils. Fert Res 41: 129–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolland MDA, Gilkes RJ & Allen DG (1988) The residual value of superphosphate and rock phosphates for lateritic soils and its evaluation using three soil phosphate tests. Fert Res 15: 253–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolland MDA, Yeates JS & Clarke MF (1996) Effect of fertilizer type, sampling depth, and years on Colwell soil test phosphorus for phosphorus leaching soils. Fert Res 44: 177–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell JD (1963) The estimation of the phosphorus fertilizer requirement of wheat in southern New South Wales by soil analysis. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 3: 190–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle DF & McGowan AA (1979) Evaluation and calibration of an automated rising plate meter for estimating dry matter yield of pasture. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 19: 337–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick EN (1961) Rock phosphate as a fertilizer. J Agric West Aust 2 (4th series): 459–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilkes RJ& Hughes JC (1994) Sodium fluoride pH of south–western Australian soils as an indicator of P sorption. Aust J Soil Res 32: 755–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillman GP (1973) Studies on some deep sandy soils in Cape York Peninsula, North Queensland. 3. Losses of applied phosphorus and sulphur. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 13: 418–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond LL, Chien SH & Easterwood GW (1986) Agronomic effectiveness of Bayovar phosphate rock in soil with induced phosphorus retention. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50: 1601–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Hingston FJ (1959) The loss of applied phosphorus and sulphur from soils under pasture in Western Australia. J Aust Instit Agric Sci 25: 209–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JC & Gilkes RJ (1984) The effect of chemical extractant on the estimation of rock phosphate dissolution. Aust J Soil Res 22: 475–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JC & Gilkes RJ (1986) The effect of rock phosphate properties on the extent of fertilizer dissolution in soils. Aust J Soil Res 24: 209–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JC & Gilkes RJ (1994) Rock phosphate dissolution and bicarbonate–soluble P in some soils from south–western Australia. Aust J Soil Res 32: 767–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanabo IAK & Gilkes RJ (1987) The influence of the addition of goethite to soil on the dissolution of North Carolina phosphate rock. Aust J Soil Res 25: 313–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanabo IAK & Gilkes RJ (1988) The effects of moisture regime and incubation period on the dissolution of North Carolina phosphate rock in soil. Aust J Soil Res 26: 153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Khasawneh FE & Doll EC (1978) The use of phosphate rock for direct application to soils. Ad Agron 30: 115–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis DC, Clarke AL & Hall WB (1981) Factors affecting the retention of phosphorus applied as superphosphate to the sandy soils in south–eastern South Australia. Aust J Soil Res 19: 167– 174

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveday J (1974) Methods for analysis of irrigated soils. Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, Tech Comm No. 939

  • Murphy J & Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chem Acta 27: 31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozanne PG & Shaw TC (1967) Phosphate sorption by soils as a measure of the phosphate requirements for pasture growth. Aust J Agric Res 18: 601–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozanne PG, Kirton DG & Shaw TC (1961) The loss of phosphorus from sandy soils. Aust J Agric Res 12: 409–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton DF & Loneragan JF (1960) An effect of lime on residual phosphorus in soil. Aust J Agric Res 11: 524–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross GJS (1980) ‘MLP Maximum Likelihood Program’ (Rothamsted Exp Stat: Harpenden, UK)

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman SR, Fuyat RK & Weiser JD (1952) Quantitative determination of calcite associated with carbonate bearing apatites. Am Mineralogist 37: 211–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JP & Lehr JR (1966) An X–ray investigation of carbonate apatites. J Agric Food Chem 14: 342–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth TJ & Sanchez PA (1982) Phosphate rock dissolution and availability in Cerrado soils as affected by phosphorus sorption capacity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46: 339–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Syers JK & MacKay AD (1986) Reactions of Sechura phosphate rock and single superphosphate in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50: 480–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A & Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic and titration method. Soil Sci 37: 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver DM, Pen LJ & Reed AEG (1994) Modifying the phosphorus cycle to achieve management objectives in the Oyster Harbour catchment. Water J 21: 28–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates JS, Deeley DM, Clarke MF & Allen D (1984) Modifying fertilizer practices. J Agric West Aust 25 (4th series): 87–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuen SH & Pollard AG (1954) Determination of nitrogen in agricultural materials by the Nessler reagent. II. Micro–determinations in plant tissue and soil extracts. J Sci Food Agric 5: 364–369

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolland, M., Gilkes, R. The relative effectiveness of superphosphate and rock phosphate for soils where vertical and lateral leaching of phosphate occurs. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 51, 139–153 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009794408746

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009794408746

Navigation