Skip to main content
Log in

Ground motion modelling with a stochastically perturbed excitation

  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a new hybrid method combining deterministic and stochastic features. The aim is to describe the crustal propagation better than deterministic or stochastic methods can do separately. We start from the deterministic hybrid method based on Discrete- Wavenumber and Finite-Difference techniques (DW–FD). First we modify the DW–FD procedure by introducing topographical variations and a spatially varying Q factor. Then, to take into account effects due to small-scale heterogeneities of the crust, we add a stochastic noise (perturbation) to the deterministic signal propagated through the crust. The stochastic noise is constructed using a kind of Markov-like process generator with two physical constraints: to have the Brune spectrum, and to reproduce the spatial decay of coherence reported in literature for real sites. We have chosen a Markov-like technique because it allows us to get stochastic noise, with the given coherence spatial decay, directly in time domain. This new hybrid method is applied in a numerical test, the parameters of which approximate the case of the 12 June, 1995 Rome earthquake. It is found that the coherence decay with distance at the alluvial valley surface is slower than the prescribed coherence decay inside the bedrock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basili A., Cantore L., Cocco M., Frepoli A., Margheriti L., Nostro C., Selvaggi G., 1996, The June 12, 1995 microearthquake sequence in the city of Rome, Annali di Geofisica XXXIX, 1167–1175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore D.M., 1983, Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on a seismological models of the radiated spectra, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73, 1865–1894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brune J.N., 1970, Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear from earthquakes, J. Geoph. Res. 75, 4997–5009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerjan C., Kosloff D., Kosloff R., Reshef M., 1985, A non-reflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations, Geophysics 50, 705–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerman S.H., Stephen R.A., 1983, Comment on 'Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations', by Calyton R. and Enquist B., Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73, 661–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fäh D., Iodice C., Suhadolc P., Panza G.F., 1993, A new method for the realistic estimation of seismic ground motion in megacities: the case of Rome, Earthquake Spectra 4, 643–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fäh D., Suhadolc P., Mueller St., Panza G.F., 1994, A hybrid method for the estimation of ground motion in sedimentary basins: quantitative modeling for Mexico City, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 383–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima Y., Gariel J., Tanaka R., 1995, Site-dependence attenuation relations of seismic motion parameters at depth using borehole data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 1790–1804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves R.W., 1996, Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using straggered-grid finite differences, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 1091–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough S.E., Field E.H., 1996, On the coherence of ground motion in the San Fernando valley, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 1724–1732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menke W., Lerner-Lam A.L., Dubendroff B., Pacheco J., 1990, Polarization and coherence of 5 to 30 Hz seismic wave fields at hard-rock site and their relevance to velocity heterogeneities in the crust, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 80, 430–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oprsal I., Zahradnik J., 1999, Elastic finite-difference method for irregular grids, Geophysics 64, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovelli A., Caserta A., Malagnini L., Marra F., 1994, Assestement of potential strong ground motions in the city of Rome, Annali di Geofisica XXXVII, 1745–1769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toksöz M.N., Dainty A.M., Charrette E.E., 1991, Coherency of ground motion at regional distances and scattering, Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 10, 53–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toksöz M.N., Dainty A.M., Coates R., 1992, Effects of lateral heterogeneities on seismic motion, Proc. of the International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, Odawara, Japan, pp. 33–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahradnik J., 1995a, Comment on 'A hybrid method for the estimation of ground motion in sedimentary basins: quantitative modelling for Mexico City' by Fäh et al., Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 1268–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahradnik J., 1995b, Simple elastic finite-difference scheme, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 1879–1887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahradnik J., Jech J., Moczo P., 1990, Absorption correction for computations of a seismic ground response, Studia Geoph. et Geod. 34, 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahradnik J., Hron F., 1992, Robust finite-difference scheme for elastic waves on coarse grids, Studia Geoph. et Geod. 36, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahradnik J., Moczo P., 1996, Hybrid seismic modelling based on discrete-wave number and finite-difference methods, Pure Appl. Geophys. 158, 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahradnik J., Priolo E., 1995, Heterogeneous formulation of elastodynamics equations and finite-difference schemes, Geophys. J. Int. 120, 663–676.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caserta, A., Zahradnik, J. & Plicka, V. Ground motion modelling with a stochastically perturbed excitation. Journal of Seismology 3, 45–59 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009782814894

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009782814894

Navigation