Abstract
Can instructors with apparently divergent approaches to the goals and methods of teaching business ethics agree upon a core set of course objectives? Can they agree upon a common method of assessment for measuring student performance against shared standards? This paper reports the results of a project intended to address these questions. The goals of the project were threefold: (1) to identify a shared set of core competencies for all students in business ethics; (2) to adopt a common assessment of ethical reasoning (neutral to disciplinary bias) for measuring student performance in core competencies; (3) to determine whether students show improvement in core competencies over the course of a semester. Our findings suggest that it is possible to find common ground in measurable objectives and to expect instructors to interpret, apply, and teach to these objectives effectively without infringing upon their disciplinary differences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Beuachamp, T. L. and N. E. Bowie: 1993, Ethical Theory and Business, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Collins, D. and S. L. Warwick: 1995, ‘Business and Society/Business Ethics Courses: Twenty Years at the Crossroads’, Business and Society 34(1), 51–89.
Elliot, N., M. Plata and P. Zelhart: 1990, A Program Development Handbook for the Holistic Assessment of Writing, Lanham, University Press of America, p. 96.
Ferrell, O. C., and J. Fraedrich: 1991, Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
Gilbert, J. T.: 1992, ‘Teaching Business Ethics: What, Why, Who, Where, and When’, Journal of Education for Business 68(1), 5–8.
Jennings, M. M.: 1993, Case Studies in Business Ethics, West Publishing Company, St. Paul.
Kavathatzopoulos, I.: 1994, ‘Training Professional Managers in Decision Making About Real Life Business Ethics Problems: The Acquisition of the Autonomous Problem Solving Skill’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 379–386.
Livingston, S. A.: 1994, Tasks in Critical Thinking: Pilot Testing the Tasks in Critical Thinking, Princeton, Higher Education Assessment: Educational Testing Service.
Parmental, G. L.: 1991, ‘The Course in Business Ethics: Why Don't Philosophers Give Business Students What They Need?’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1, 385–394.
Rest, J. R.: 1979, Development in Judging Moral Issues, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press (Available from MMRP, University of Minnesota).
Snarey, J. and K. Keljo, K.: 1994, ‘Revitalizing the Meaning and Measurement of Moral Development. Essay Review of “Moral Maturity: Measuring the Development of Sociomoral Reflection” by J. C. Gibbs, K. S. Basinger and D. Fuller’, Human Development 37(3), 181–186.
Thoma, S. J.: 1994, ‘Trends and Issues in Moral Judgment Research Using the Defining Issues Test’, Moral Education Forum 19(1), 1–7.
White, C. S. and R. S. Dooley: 1993, ‘Ethical or Practical: An Empirical Study of Students' Choices in Simulated Business Scenarios’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 643–651.
White, E. M.: 1985, Teaching and Assessing Writing: Recent Advances in Understanding, Evaluating, and Improving Student Performance, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holt, D., Heischmidt, K., Hill, H.H. et al. When Philosophy and Business Professors Talk: Assessment of Ethical Reasoning in a Cross Disciplinary Business Ethics Course. Teaching Business Ethics 1, 253–268 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009757031900
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009757031900