Abstract
In a recent letter, new representations were proposed for the pair of sequences (γ,δ), as defined formally by Bailey in his famous lemma. Here we extend and prove this result, providing pairs (γ,δ) labelled by the Lie algebra AN − 1, two nonnegative integers ℓ and k and a partition λ, whose parts do not exceed N − 1. Our results give rise to what we call a “higher level” Bailey lemma. As an application it is shown how this lemma can be applied to yield general q-series identities, which generalize some well-known results of Andrews and Bressoud.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A.K. Agarwal, G.E. Andrews, and D.M. Bressoud, “The Bailey lattice,” J. Ind. Math. Soc. 51 (1987), 57-73.
G.E. Andrews, “Some new partition theorems,” J. Combin. Theory 2 (1967), 431-436.
G.E. Andrews, “A generalization of the Göllnitz-Gordon partition theorems,” Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (1967), 954-952.
G.E. Andrews, “An analytic generalization of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities for odd moduli,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 71 (1974), 4082-4085.
G.E. Andrews, “Problems and prospects for basic hypergeometric functions,” in The Theory and Applications of Special Functions (R. Askey, ed.), Academic Press, New York, 1975, pp. 191-224.
G.E. Andrews, “The theory of partitions,” Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Vol. 2, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1976.
G.E. Andrews, “Multiple series Rogers-Ramanujan type identities,” Pacific J. Math. 114 (1984), 267-283.
W.N. Bailey, “Identities of the Rogers-Ramanujan type,” Proc. London Math. Soc. 50(2) (1949), 1-10.
A. Berkovich, “Fermionic counting of RSOS-states and Virasoro character formulas for the unitary minimal series M(v, v + 1). Exact results,” Nucl. Phys. B 431 (1994), 315-348.
A. Berkovich and B.M. McCoy, “Continued fractions and fermionic representations for characters of M(p, p′) minimal models,” Lett. Math. Phys. 37 (1996), 49-66.
A. Berkovich, B.M. McCoy, and W.P. Orrick, “Polynomial identities, indices, and duality for the N = 1 superconformal model SM(2, 4v),” J. Stat. Phys. 83 (1996), 795-837.
A. Berkovich, B.M. McCoy, and A. Schilling, “N = 2 supersymmetry and Bailey pairs,” Physica A 228 (1996), 33-62.
A. Berkovich, B.M. McCoy, and A. Schilling, “Rogers-Schur-Ramanujan type identities for the M(p, p′) minimal models of conformal field theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 191 (1998), 325-395.
A. Berkovich, B.M. McCoy, A. Schilling, and S.O. Warnaar, “Bailey flows and Bose-Fermi identities for the conformal coset models (A (1)1 )N×(A (1)1 )N′/(A (1)1 )N+N′”, Nucl. Phys. B 499 [PM] (1997), 621-649.
D.M. Bressoud, “A generalization of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities for all moduli,” J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 27 (1979), 64-68.
D.M. Bressoud, “An analytic generalization of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities with interpretation,” Quart. J. Maths. (Oxford) 31(2) (1980), 385-399.
D.M. Bressoud, “Analytic and combinatorial generalizations of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities,” Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. 24 (1980), 1-54.
D.M. Bressoud, “The Bailey lattice: An introduction,” in Ramanujan Revisited (G.E. Andrews et al., eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1988, pp. 57-67.
S. Dasmahapatra, R. Kedem, T.R. Klassen, B.M. McCoy, and E. Melzer, “Quasi-particles, conformal field theory, and q-series,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 7 (1993), 3617-3648.
O. Foda, M. Okado, and S.O. Warnaar, “A proof of polynomial identities of type \(s\widehat{l\left( n \right)}_1 \otimes {{s\widehat{l\left( n \right)}_1 } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{s\widehat{l\left( n \right)}_1 } {s\widehat{l\left( n \right)}_2 }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {s\widehat{l\left( n \right)}_2 }}\),” J. Math. Phys. 37 (1996), 965-986.
O. Foda and Y.-H. Quano, “Virasoro character identities from the Andrews-Bailey construction,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12 (1997), 1651-1676.
G. Gaspar and M. Rahman, Basic Hypergeometric Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990, Appendix I.
H. Göllnitz, “Partitionen mit Differenzenbedingungen,” J. Reine Angew. Math. 225 (1967), 154-190.
B. Gordon, “A combinatorial generalization of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities,” Amer. J. Math. 83 (1961), 393-399.
B. Gordon, “Some continued fractions of the Rogers-Ramanujan type,” Duke Math. 31 (1965), 741-748.
M. Jimbo and T. Miwa, “Irreducible decomposition of fundamental modules for A (1)ℓ and C (1)ℓ , and Hecke modular forms,” Adv. Stud. in Pure Math. 4 (1984), 97-119.
M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, and M. Okado, “Local state probabilities of solvable lattice models: An A (1) n-1 family,” Nucl. Phys. B 300 [FS22] (1988), 74-108.
V.G. Kac and D.H. Peterson, “Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras, theta functions and modular forms,” Adv. in Math. 53 (1984), 125-264.
J. Lepowsky and M. Primc, “Structure of the standard modules for the affine Lie algebra A (1)1 ,” Contemp. Math. 46, AMS, Providence, 1985.
G.M. Lilly and S.C. Milne, “The C ℓ Bailey transform and Bailey lemma,” Constr. Approx. 9 (1993), 473-500.
P.A. MacMahon, Combinatory Analysis, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, London and New York, 1916.
S.C. Milne and G.M. Lilly, “The A ℓ and C ℓ Bailey transform and lemma,” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 26 (1992), 258-263.
S.C. Milne and G.M. Lilly, “Consequences of the A ℓ and C ℓ Bailey transform and Bailey lemma,” Discrete Math. 139 (1995), 319-346.
L.J. Rogers, “Second memoir on the expansion of certain infinite products,” Proc. London Math. Soc. 25 (1894), 318-343.
L.J. Rogers and S. Ramanujan, “Proof of certain identities in combinatory analysis,” Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 19 (1919), 211-216.
A. Schilling and S.O. Warnaar, “A higher level Bailey lemma,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 11 (1997), 189-195.
L.J. Slater, “A new proof of Rogers's transformations of infinite series,” Proc. London Math. Soc. 53(2) (1951), 460-475.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schilling, A., Ole Warnaar, S. A Higher Level Bailey Lemma: Proof and Application. The Ramanujan Journal 2, 327–349 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009746932284
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009746932284