Skip to main content
Log in

Vegetative propagation and sexual reproduction in the woodland understorey pseudo-annual Circaea lutetiana L.

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On the forest floor of deciduous woodlands, relative light intensity gradually declines during the early growing season. The woodland understorey pseudo-annual Circaea lutetiana L. completes its life-cycle at the end of summer. These pseudo-annuals are clonal plants which survive the winter only as seeds and as hibernacles produced by the rhizome apices. In this paper, we asked several questions related to the life-history of C. lutetiana. It was found that shoot formation in early spring did not exhaust the old hibernacle. A trade-off between rhizome + hibernacle number and weight might be expected when plants grow under resource limitation. It was hypothesised that both number and weight of rhizomes and hibernacles will be affected by light availability. Since the effect of resource supply on the size number trade-off will depend on the developmental pattern of the rhizome system, rhizome development was studied as well. Soon after the shoots emerged, 1st order rhizomes were formed in May on the nodes of the old hibernacle. First-order rhizomes branched in June and 2nd order rhizomes (side-branches) were continuously produced throughout the growing season. The phenology and developmental rate of plants growing in different light treatments were plastic. On average 30% of rhizome biomass was formed during the vegetative phase, and rhizome and fruit production were only partly separated in time. The ratio of total rhizome biomass to total fruit biomass was not affected by light. Also flower bud removal did not lead to an increase in rhizome production, which suggests that division of biomass to both reproductive modes is rather rigid. The number of 1st order rhizomes was not affected by the light treatments. Under light limitation, both rhizome number and weight of single rhizomes were reduced. In contrast, fruit number, but not weight of single fruits, was limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, W. G. 1980. Demography and vegetative reproduction. Pp. 89-106. In: Solbrig, O. T. (ed.), Demography and evolution in plant populations, Botanical Monograph vol. 15. Blackwell Scientific Publishers., Oxford, London, Edingburgh, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Andel, J., van Baalen, J. & Rozijn, N. A. M. 1991. Population ecology of plant species in disturbed forest and grassland habitats. Pp. 136-148. In: Rozema, J. & Verkleij, J. A. C. (eds), Ecological responses to environmental stresses. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. C. 1964. Studies of the woodland light climate. II Seasonal variation in the light climate. J. Ecol. 52: 643-663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C. & Loucks, O. L. 1973. Aspects of the biology of Trientalis borealisRaf. Ecology 54: 798-808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkham, J. P. 1980. Population dynamics of the wild daffodil (Narcissus pseudonarcissus). I Clonal growth, seed production, mortality and the effects of density. J. Ecology 68: 607-633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boufford, D. E. 1982. The systematics and evolution of Circaea(Onagraceae). Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 69: 804-994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F. S. III, Shulze, E. D. & Mooney, H. A. 1990. The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 21: 423-447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. E. 1985. Growth and development in clonal plant populations. Pp. 259-296. In: Jackson, J. B. C., Buss, L.W. & Cook, R. E. (eds), Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, M., During, H. J. & Werger, M. J. A. 1997. Clonal plasticity in response to nutrient availability in the pseudoannual herb, Trientalis europaeaL.. Plant Ecology 131: 233-239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendael van, J. M. & Habekotté, B. 1988. Cyperus esculentusL. Biology, population dynamics, and possibilities to control this neophyte. Z. PflKrankh. PflSchutz, Sonderh. XI: 61-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J. L. 1977. The population biology of plants. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiirsalmi, H. 1969. Trientalis europaeaL. A study of the reproductive biology, ecology and variation in Finland. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 6: 119-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa, Y., Cohen, D. 1989. Optimal growth schedule of a perennial plant. Am. Nat. 133: 480-505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerling, L. 1988. Clone dynamics, population dynamics and vegetation pattern of Glaux maritimaon a Baltic sea shore meadow. Vegetatio 74: 171-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano, S. 1985. Life history characteristics of temperate woodland plants in Japan. Pp. 515-549. In: White, J. (ed) The population structure of vegetation, Handbook of vegetation science, Vol. 3. Dr W.Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kroon, H. & Hutchings, M. J. 1995. Morphological plasticity in clonal plants: the foraging concept reconsidered. J. Ecology 83: 143-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers, A. E. & Lechowicz, M. J. 1989. Effects of leaf removal on reproduction vs belowground storage in Trillium grandiflorum. Ecology 70: 85-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Meijden, R. 1990. Heukels’ flora van Nederland. 21ste druk. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani, S. & Kimura, M. 1993. Resource allocation to sexual and vegetative reproduction in a forest herb Syneilesis palmata(Compositae). Ecol. Res. 8: 173-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitelka, L. F., Ashmun, J.W. & Brown, R. L. 1985. The relationships between seasonal variation in light intensity, ramet size, and sexual reproduction in natural and experimental populations of Aster acuminatus(Compositae). Am. J. Bot. 72: 311-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pons, T. L. 1976. An ecophysiological study in the field layer of Ash coppice. I. Field measurements. Acta Bot. Neerl. 25: 401-416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pons, T. L. 1983. An ecophysiological study in the field layer of Ash coppice. PhD thesis Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, E. J. 1942. The reproductive capacity of plants. Studies in quantitative biology. G. Bell and Sons, LTD, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, D. A. & Werk, K. S. 1986. Size-dependent effects in the analysis of reproductive effort in plants. Am. Nat. 127: 667-680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS. 1985. SAS/STAT Guide for personal computers Version 6.0.4 Edition. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. & Dixon, E. J. 1968. The automatic determination of original gravity of Beer. Part I. Introduction and determination of reducing sugar after hydrolysis. Analyst 93: 669-679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown, J. 1989. The paradox of seed size and adaptation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4: 24-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry 2nd edition. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, S. C. 1989. Trade-offs in Life-history evolution. Funct. Ecol. 3: 259-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struik, G. J. 1965. Growth patterns of some native annual and perennial herbs in Southern Wisconsin. Ecology 46: 401-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vierssen, W., Mathies, A. & Vermaat, J. E. 1994. Early growth characteristics of Potamogeton pectinatusL.: the significance of the tuber. Pp. 135-143. In: van Vierssen, W., Hootsman, M. J.M. & Vermaat, J. E. (eds), Lake Veluwe, a macrophyte-dominated system under eutrohication stress. Kluwer Academic Publishers, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verburg, R. W., Kwant, R. & Werger, M. J. A. 1996. The effect of plant size on vegetative reproduction in a pseudo-annual. Vegetatio 125: 185-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M. A. 1990. Phenological effects on clone development and demography. Pp. 43-56. In: van Groenendael, J. & de Kroon, H. (eds), Clonal growth in plants: regulation and function SPB Academic Publishers, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werger, M. J. A. & van Laar, E.M. J. 1985. Seasonal changes in the structure of the herb layer of a deciduous woodland. Flora 176: 351-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, L. C. 1993. The effect of inflorescence bud removal on tuber production in Helianthus tuberosusL. (Asteraceae). Ecology 74: 2136-2144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whigham, D. 1974. An ecological life history study of Uvularia perfoliataL. Am. Midl. Nat. 91: 243-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J. K. & Whigham, D. F. 1992. Ecological functions of carbohydrates stored in corms of Tipularia discolor(Orchidaceae). Funct. Ecol. 6: 575-581.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verburg, R.W., During, H.J. Vegetative propagation and sexual reproduction in the woodland understorey pseudo-annual Circaea lutetiana L.. Plant Ecology 134, 211–224 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009741102627

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009741102627

Navigation