Skip to main content
Log in

Technological Change, Market Rivalry, and the Evolution of the Capitalist Engine of Growth

  • Published:
Journal of Economic Growth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the early stages of Western industrialization, innovation was the domain of individuals who devoted their entrepreneurial talents to the development of a new product or process, typically setting up a new firm in order to take the innovation to the market. Today, commercial R&D is almost exclusively carried out by corporate laboratories affiliated with manufacturing firms. The corporate R&D lab, however, did not exist in its modern form until the late nineteenth century. The history of Western industrialization, thus, suggests that a fundamental change in the structure of incentives, and consequently in the nature and the organization of the R&D process, occurred around the turn of the century. Three questions arise. What is the nature of this change? What economic forces caused it? What are its implications? To answer these questions, I construct a model where this change is endogenous to the evolution of the economy toward industrial maturity. The change in the locus of innovation—from R&D undertaken by intventor-entrepreneurs, to R&D undertaken within established firms in close proximity to the production line—results from the interaction of market structure and technological change. This interaction captures the essence of the evolution of the capitalist engine of growth and provides an economic explanation of a “stylized fact” that has received no attention in the theoretical literature. The endogenous market structure generates dynamic feedbacks that shape the growth path of the economy and determine the structural change it undergoes, including the endogenous formation of corporate R&D labs. The evolution of market rivalry explains when and how established firms become the major locus of R&D activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. (1992). “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction.” Econometrica 60, 323–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, W., and J. Scott. (1987). Market Structure and Technological Change. New York: Harwood Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. (1993). Entrepreneurship, Management, and the Structure of Payoffs. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beath, J., and Y. Katsoulacos. (1991). The Economic Theory of Product Differentiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardwell, D. (1995). The Norton History of Technology. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W., and R. Levin. (1989). “Empirical Studies of Market Structure and Innovation.” In Richard Schmalensee and Robert Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crafts, N. (1996). “The First Industrial Revolution: A Guided Tour for Growth Economists.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 86, 197–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., and J. Stiglitz. (1980). “Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity.” Economic Journal 90, 266–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A., and J. Stiglitz. (1977). “Monopolistic Competition and Optimal Product Diversity.” American Economic Review 67, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1988). “Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation.” Journal of Economic Literature 36, 1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fershtman, C., and E. Mueller. (1984). “Capital Accumulation Games of Infinite Duration.” Journal of Economic Theory 33, 322–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., and J. Tirole. (1991). Game Theory. Cambridge: MIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G., and E. Helpman. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge: MIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M., and A. Schwartz. (1982). Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klevorick, A., R. Levin, R. Nelson, and S. Winter. (1995). “On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities.” Research Policy 24, 185–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R., A. Klevorick, R. Nelson, and S. Winter. (1987). “Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3, 783–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. (1982). Phases of Capitalist Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F. (1992). “Learning by Firms and Incremental Technical Change.” Economic Journal 102, 845–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F., and L. Orsenigo. (1995). “Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 19, 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F., and L. Orsenigo. (1996). “On New Innovators and Ex Innovators: An Empirical Analysis of the Patterns of Innovative Natality and Mortality.” Manuscript, Bocconi University.

  • Malerba, F., L. Orsenigo, and P. Peretto. (1997). “Persistence of Innovative Activities, Sectoral Patterns of Innovation, and International Technological Specialization.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 15, 801–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D., and N. Rosenberg. (1989). Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peretto, P. (1994). “Essays on Market Structure and Economic Growth.” Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.

  • Peretto, P. (1995). “Cost Reduction, Entry, and the Dynamics of Market Structure and Economic Growth.” Working Paper 95/48, Department of Economics, Duke University.

  • Peretto, P. (1996a). “Industrialization, Technological Change, and Long-Run Growth.” Working Paper 96/22, Department of Economics, Duke University.

  • Peretto, P. (1996b). “Sunk Costs, Market Structure and Growth.” International Economic Review 37, 895–923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peretto, P. (1996c). “Technological Change and Population Growth.” Working Paper 96/28, Department of Economics, Duke University.

  • Romer, P. (1990). “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98, S71–S102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1996). “Why, Indeed, in America? Theory, History, and the Origins of Modern Economic Growth.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 86, 202–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the Black Box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1994). Exploring the Black Box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. (1984). Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives. Cambridge: MIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F., and D. Ross. (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1928). “The Instability of Capitalism.” Economic Journal 38, 361–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smulders, S., and T. van de Klundert. (1995). “Imperfect Competition, Concentration and Growth with Firm-Specific R&D.” European Economic Review 39, 139–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1984). “Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance.” Econometrica 52, 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. (1991). Sunk Costs and Market Structure. Cambridge: MIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temin, P. (1964). Iron and steel in Nineteenth-Century America. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P., and D. Waldo. (1994). “Growth and Trustified Capitalism.” Journal of Monetary Economics 34, 445–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Klundert, T., and S. Smulders. (1997). “Growth, Competition and Welfare.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 99, 99–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peretto, P.F. Technological Change, Market Rivalry, and the Evolution of the Capitalist Engine of Growth. Journal of Economic Growth 3, 53–80 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009722031825

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009722031825

Navigation