Abstract
Documentation of atrial signals in stored endocardial electrograms of modern implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) is a useful tool to classify the underlying arrhythmia leading to device therapy. Newest generations of ICD provide near- and far-field electrograms derived between various endocardial electrodes. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the quality and long-term stability of atrial signals in different far-field configurations including the active can housing.
Methods and Results:
A total of 300 real-time endocardial electrogram recordings in 60 consecutive patients with a modern ICD in subpectoral position were analysed at the time of implant, pre-hospital discharge, 1, 3 and 12 months<%0> follow-up. Four different configurations were evaluated: right ventricular coil to can housing, can housing to pace/ sense ring, right ventricular coil to pace/sense tip, and pace/ sense tip to pace/sense ring. The best visibility of p-waves at an ECG-resolution of 0.5 mV/mm was seen in the can to coil configuration (77% of the patients). In the can to pace/sense ring electrogram p-waves could be observed in 58% of the patients. No p-waves were visible to pace/sense tip to pace/ sense ring. At a resolution of 1.0 mV/mm p-waves were only visible in 10% of all patients exclusively in the can housing to right ventricular coil configuration. The results were stable (100% of the patients) over a follow-up of one year.
Conclusions:
Endocardial far-field electrograms, derived from the can housing and the right ventricular coil provide a p-wave visibility in 77% of the patients and demonstrate a long-term stability over at least one year, provided that the ECG-resolution is set at 0.5 mV/mm. Since the electrogram resolution of stored electrograms depends on the EGM-range, and the ECG-resolution at an EGM-range of 15 mV would be 1 mV/mm, the EGM-range is recommended to be programmed to 7.5 mV to ensure an ECG-resolution of at least 0,5 mV/mm for stored electrograms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hook BG, Marchlinski FE. Value of ventricular electrogram recordings in the diagnosis of arrhythmias precipitating electrical device shock therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17: 985-990.
Wang PJ, Mandalakas N, Clyne C, et al. Accuracy of rhythm classification using a data log system in implantable cardioverterdefibrillator. PACE 1991;14:1911-1916.
Grimm W, Flores BF, Marchlinski FE, et al. Electrocardiographically documented unnecessary, spontaneous shocks in 241 patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. PACE 1992;15:1667-1673.
Pinski SL, Fahy GJ. The proarrhythmic potential of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Circulation1995;92: 1651-1664.
Hamer ME, Clair WK, Wilkinson WE, et al. Evaluation of outpatients experiencing implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks associated with minimal symptoms. PACE 1994;17:938-943.
Grimm W, Flores F, Marchlinski FE, et al. Complications of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: Follow-up of 241 patients. PACE 1993;16:218-222.
Johnson NJ, Marchlinski FE. Arrhythmias induced by device antitachycardia therapy due to diagnostic nonspecificity. J Am Coll Cardiol1991;18:1418-1425.
Hook BG, Callans DJ, Kleimann RB, et al. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in the absence of significant symptoms. Circulation 1993;87:1897-1906.
Neuzner J, for the European Ventak P2 Investigator Group. Clinical experience with a new cardioverter-defibrillator capable of biphasic waveform pulse and enhanced data storage: Results of a prospective multicenter study. PACE 1994; 17:1243-1255.
Jung W, Korte T, Wolpert C, et al. Evidence of inappropriate and abortive shock delivery: Importance of stored electrograms. PACE 1993;16(Suppl):1166. (Abstract).
Block M, BÖcker D, Clerc G, et al. Electrograms as a diagnostic tool in ICD—Comparison of sensing and defibrillation leads. Herzschr Elektrophys 1993;3:169. (Abstract).
Neuzner J, Pitschner HF, KÖnig S, et al. Stored intracardiac electrograms: Accuracy in arrhythmia classification in patients with cardioverter-defibrillators. Z Kardiol 1993;82: 459-465.
Wolpert C, Jung W, Spehl S, et al. Quality of atrial signals in endocardial electrograms of pectorally implanted cardioverterdefibrillators. PACE 1996;17(Suppl):678. (Abstract).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolpert, C., Jung, W., Spehl, S. et al. Prospective Evaluation of the Quality and Long-Term Stability of Atrial Signals in Non-thoracotomy Defibrillation Electrodes: Comparison of Four Different Endocardial Electrograms. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2, 351–355 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009708604125
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009708604125