Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective Evaluation of the Quality and Long-Term Stability of Atrial Signals in Non-thoracotomy Defibrillation Electrodes: Comparison of Four Different Endocardial Electrograms

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Documentation of atrial signals in stored endocardial electrograms of modern implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) is a useful tool to classify the underlying arrhythmia leading to device therapy. Newest generations of ICD provide near- and far-field electrograms derived between various endocardial electrodes. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the quality and long-term stability of atrial signals in different far-field configurations including the active can housing.

Methods and Results:

A total of 300 real-time endocardial electrogram recordings in 60 consecutive patients with a modern ICD in subpectoral position were analysed at the time of implant, pre-hospital discharge, 1, 3 and 12 months<%0> follow-up. Four different configurations were evaluated: right ventricular coil to can housing, can housing to pace/ sense ring, right ventricular coil to pace/sense tip, and pace/ sense tip to pace/sense ring. The best visibility of p-waves at an ECG-resolution of 0.5 mV/mm was seen in the can to coil configuration (77% of the patients). In the can to pace/sense ring electrogram p-waves could be observed in 58% of the patients. No p-waves were visible to pace/sense tip to pace/ sense ring. At a resolution of 1.0 mV/mm p-waves were only visible in 10% of all patients exclusively in the can housing to right ventricular coil configuration. The results were stable (100% of the patients) over a follow-up of one year.

Conclusions:

Endocardial far-field electrograms, derived from the can housing and the right ventricular coil provide a p-wave visibility in 77% of the patients and demonstrate a long-term stability over at least one year, provided that the ECG-resolution is set at 0.5 mV/mm. Since the electrogram resolution of stored electrograms depends on the EGM-range, and the ECG-resolution at an EGM-range of 15 mV would be 1 mV/mm, the EGM-range is recommended to be programmed to 7.5 mV to ensure an ECG-resolution of at least 0,5 mV/mm for stored electrograms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hook BG, Marchlinski FE. Value of ventricular electrogram recordings in the diagnosis of arrhythmias precipitating electrical device shock therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17: 985-990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang PJ, Mandalakas N, Clyne C, et al. Accuracy of rhythm classification using a data log system in implantable cardioverterdefibrillator. PACE 1991;14:1911-1916.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grimm W, Flores BF, Marchlinski FE, et al. Electrocardiographically documented unnecessary, spontaneous shocks in 241 patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. PACE 1992;15:1667-1673.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pinski SL, Fahy GJ. The proarrhythmic potential of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Circulation1995;92: 1651-1664.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hamer ME, Clair WK, Wilkinson WE, et al. Evaluation of outpatients experiencing implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks associated with minimal symptoms. PACE 1994;17:938-943.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grimm W, Flores F, Marchlinski FE, et al. Complications of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: Follow-up of 241 patients. PACE 1993;16:218-222.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson NJ, Marchlinski FE. Arrhythmias induced by device antitachycardia therapy due to diagnostic nonspecificity. J Am Coll Cardiol1991;18:1418-1425.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hook BG, Callans DJ, Kleimann RB, et al. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in the absence of significant symptoms. Circulation 1993;87:1897-1906.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Neuzner J, for the European Ventak P2 Investigator Group. Clinical experience with a new cardioverter-defibrillator capable of biphasic waveform pulse and enhanced data storage: Results of a prospective multicenter study. PACE 1994; 17:1243-1255.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jung W, Korte T, Wolpert C, et al. Evidence of inappropriate and abortive shock delivery: Importance of stored electrograms. PACE 1993;16(Suppl):1166. (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Block M, BÖcker D, Clerc G, et al. Electrograms as a diagnostic tool in ICD—Comparison of sensing and defibrillation leads. Herzschr Elektrophys 1993;3:169. (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neuzner J, Pitschner HF, KÖnig S, et al. Stored intracardiac electrograms: Accuracy in arrhythmia classification in patients with cardioverter-defibrillators. Z Kardiol 1993;82: 459-465.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wolpert C, Jung W, Spehl S, et al. Quality of atrial signals in endocardial electrograms of pectorally implanted cardioverterdefibrillators. PACE 1996;17(Suppl):678. (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolpert, C., Jung, W., Spehl, S. et al. Prospective Evaluation of the Quality and Long-Term Stability of Atrial Signals in Non-thoracotomy Defibrillation Electrodes: Comparison of Four Different Endocardial Electrograms. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2, 351–355 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009708604125

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009708604125

Navigation