Skip to main content
Log in

Factors Influencing the Growth in Knowledge of Trainees in General Practice

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: The relation between the content of postgraduate training for general practice and the outcome in terms of the growth in knowledge of trainees was investigated. The training variables included were: (1) the number of patients seen per day, (2) the trainer, (3) the practice and (4) the theoretical curriculum.

Methods: Subjects were 58 trainee-trainer pairs. Growth in knowledge was assessed by two written tests administered with eight months interval. Training variables were evaluated by means of questionnaires and logbook-registration. The correlation was explored between each of the training variables and the knowledge tests scores. To correct for interactional effects, a step-wise multiple regression analysis was performed with the second test as dependent variable and the first test as well as the training variables as independent variables.

Results: Significant growth in knowledge was demonstrated. Non of all training variables investigated explained the variance in scores on the second test equally good or better than the scores on the entry test.

Conclusions: The impact of the separate training-components on the growth in knowledge, remains unclear. We may speculate, that the sort of knowledge assessed with the written literature based true/false test is different from the sort of knowledge transferred during every day training: evidence based knowledge versus experience based knowledge. Equally valid is the conclusion that these findings fit into the theory that in adult learning the outcome is more learner than teacher dependent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blalock, H.M. (1984). Applied Multivariate Analysis and Experimental Designs. SAGE Publications: Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bligh, J.G. (1992). Independent Learning Among General Practice Trainees: An Initial Survey. Medical Education 26: 497-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boerma, W.G.W., De Jong, F.A.J.M. & Mulder, P.H. (1993). Health Care and General Practice Across Europe. NIVEL/NHG: Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordage, G. & Page, G. (1987). An Alternative Approach to PMPs: The ‘Key Features’ Concept. In: Hart, I.R. & Harden, R.M. (eds.) Further Developments in Assessing Clinical Competence. Heal Publications: Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. (1970). How We Should Measure “Change” — or Should We? Psychological Bulletin 74: 68-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, V., Everwijn, S., Van Geldorp, G. et al. (1987). The Construction of a New Curriculum of Vocational Training for General Practice in the Netherlands. Royal Dutch Medical Association: Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J., Roberts, J., Metcalf, D. & Hillier, V. (1982). The Influence of Trainers on Trainees in General Practice. [Occasional paper 21]. Royal College of General Practitioners: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grol, R., Mokkink, H., Helsper-Lucas, A., Tielens, V. & Bulte, J. (1989). Effects of the Vocational Training of General Practice Consultation skills and Medical Performance. Medical Education 23: 512-521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles ME. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Learning. Prentice Hall: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, M. & Pritchard, P. (eds.) (1992). General Practitioner Education; UK and Nordic Perspectives. Springer Verlag: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P.J. & Bass, M.J. (1983). Characteristics of Highly Rated Family Practice Perceptors. Journal of Medical Education 58: 882-893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M.S., Clayton, B.L. & Moreno, R. (1990). How Medical School Faculty Regard Educational Research and Make Pedagogical Decisions. Academic Medicine 65: 122-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. (1991). Can an Examination Predict Competence? The Role of Certification in Maintenance of Competence. Annals RCPSC 2: 121-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris SG, Newman RS (1990). Developmental Aspects of Self-Regulated Learning. Educ. Psychol 25: 87-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira Gray, D.J. (1982). Training for General Practice. Butler & Tanner Ltd: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollemans, M.C. (1984). Kennistoetsing bij huisartsen. [Knowledge testing for general practitioners]. [Thesis]. Maastricht: Datawyse/University Press Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronalds, C., Douglas, A., Pereira Gray, D.J. & Selley, P. (1981). Fourth National Trainee Conference. Report Recommendations and Questionnaire [Occasional paper 18]. Royal College of General Practitioners: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman B.J. & Schunk D.H. (eds.) (1989). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement. Theory, Research and Practice. Springer Verlag: New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Leeuwen, Y.D., Düsman, H., Mol, S.S. et al. Factors Influencing the Growth in Knowledge of Trainees in General Practice. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2, 61–70 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009704332521

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009704332521

Navigation