Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring Assessment

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scant attention has been paid to the issue of conducting assessment in technology-equipped settings. Often, when assessments have been conducted, standardized achievement tests, constructed to ask questions that may have no relevance for technology-based learning, are used. A wide variety of assessment procedures are available but caution must be taken that the use of such measures is relevant for the situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achenbach, T. (1970) The Children's Associative Responding Test: A possible alternative to group IQ tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 340-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebee, A. (1989) The enterprise we are part of: Learning to teach, in P. Murphy and B. Moon (eds.) Developments in Learning and Assessment. Hodder & Stoughton, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzie, D. (1995) The impact of our questions on Information Technology policies and practices, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Computers in Education VI: Liberating the Learner. J.D. Tinsley and T.J. van Weert (eds.), Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. (1989) Mathematics education in its cultural context, in P. Murphy and B. Moon (eds.), Developments in Learning and Assessment. Hodder & Stoughton, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottino, R. et al. (1999) Activity theory: A framework for design and reporting on research projects based on ICT.Education and Information Technologies 4(3)

  • Broadfoot, P. (1987) Introducing Profiling: A Practical Manual. Macmillan Education Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, R. (1962) Education and the Cult of Efficiency: A Study of Social Forces that Have Shaped the Administration of Public Schools. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, P.H. (1967) The History of Psychometrics. Washington University, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Beat. (1998) Assessing technology. February 13, 1998, p. 2.

  • Goldstein, G. (1962) Development Studies in Analogical Reasoning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KA.

  • Herman, J., Aschenbacher, P. and Winters, L. (1992) A Practical Guide to Alternative Assessment. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, M. (1984) Comprehensive School Mathematics Program: Final Evaluation Report. McRel, Denver, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, M. and Marshall, G. (1981) Evaluation Report 8-C-1: Preliminary Study of CSMP ‘Graduates'.CEMREL, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennewell, S. (1997) The integration of Information Technology into teachers’ decision making, in D. Passey and B. Samways (eds.) Information Technology: Supporting Change Through Teacher Education. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, G. (in progress) Singing new songs: Children learning from technology.

  • Marshall, G. (1995) The ABC's of today's technology decision making in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. A paper presented at the Sixth IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education, Birmingham, UK, July 23–28, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, G. (1994) Cautionary verses: Prospects and problems in achieving the aims of the computer revolution, in J. Wright and D. Benzie, (eds.) Exploring a New Partnership: Children, Teachers and Technology, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, G. (1993) Informatics and changes in learning: The American dilemma and opposing epistemological perspectives and unanswered questions, in D.C. Johnson and B. Samways (eds.) Informatics and Changes in Learning, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, G. (1981) School Achievement Test Contributors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. and Moon, B. (1989) Developments in Learning and Assessment. Hodder & Stoughton, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. and Simon, H. (1972) Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, P. (1995) Constructivist approaches to tackling economic anthropomorphism in Australian IT education. A paper presented at the Sixth IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education, Birmingham, UK, July 23-28, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, M.D., Castine, W.H. & King, F.J. (1988) Assessing the impact of computer-based instruction. Computers in Schools, 5 (3–4).

  • Rosch, E. (1973) On the internal structure and perceptual and semantic categories, in T.E. Mooze (ed.) Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosvik, S. (1998) Information Technology in Norwegian education: Consistency of strategic initiatives implementing IT in primary education, in G. Marshall and M. Ruohonen (eds.) Capacity Building for IT in Education in Developing Countries. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (1991) A Sampler of Mathematics Assessment. California State Department of Education, Sacramento, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1923) The Nature of Intelligence and Principles of Cognition. Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, J. (1975) Implementation and Child Effects of Teaching Practices in Follow Through Classrooms, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40/7,8, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark, J. (1989) Assessment Alternatives in Mathematics: An Overview of Assessment Techniques That Promote Learning. Regents, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Weert, T. (1998) Informatics for secondary education: The UNESCO/IFIP Curriculum as a resource for developed and developing countries, in G. Marshall and M. Ruohonen (eds.) Capacity Building for IT in Education in Developing Countries. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visscher, A.J. (1998) Building capacity for Information Technology in educational management in developing countries, in G. Marshall and M. Ruohonen (eds.) Capacity Building for IT in Education in Developing Countries. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (1998) Blame the technocentric artefact! What research tells us about problems inhibiting teacher use of IT, in G. Marshall and M. Ruohonen (eds.) Capacity Building for IT in Education in Developing Countries.Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marshall, G. Exploring Assessment. Education and Information Technologies 4, 311–327 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009696327264

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009696327264

Navigation