Abstract
Scant attention has been paid to the issue of conducting assessment in technology-equipped settings. Often, when assessments have been conducted, standardized achievement tests, constructed to ask questions that may have no relevance for technology-based learning, are used. A wide variety of assessment procedures are available but caution must be taken that the use of such measures is relevant for the situation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achenbach, T. (1970) The Children's Associative Responding Test: A possible alternative to group IQ tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 340-348.
Applebee, A. (1989) The enterprise we are part of: Learning to teach, in P. Murphy and B. Moon (eds.) Developments in Learning and Assessment. Hodder & Stoughton, London.
Benzie, D. (1995) The impact of our questions on Information Technology policies and practices, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Computers in Education VI: Liberating the Learner. J.D. Tinsley and T.J. van Weert (eds.), Chapman & Hall, London.
Bishop, A. (1989) Mathematics education in its cultural context, in P. Murphy and B. Moon (eds.), Developments in Learning and Assessment. Hodder & Stoughton, London.
Bottino, R. et al. (1999) Activity theory: A framework for design and reporting on research projects based on ICT.Education and Information Technologies 4(3)
Broadfoot, P. (1987) Introducing Profiling: A Practical Manual. Macmillan Education Ltd., London.
Callahan, R. (1962) Education and the Cult of Efficiency: A Study of Social Forces that Have Shaped the Administration of Public Schools. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
DuBois, P.H. (1967) The History of Psychometrics. Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Education Beat. (1998) Assessing technology. February 13, 1998, p. 2.
Goldstein, G. (1962) Development Studies in Analogical Reasoning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KA.
Herman, J., Aschenbacher, P. and Winters, L. (1992) A Practical Guide to Alternative Assessment. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.
Herbert, M. (1984) Comprehensive School Mathematics Program: Final Evaluation Report. McRel, Denver, CO.
Herbert, M. and Marshall, G. (1981) Evaluation Report 8-C-1: Preliminary Study of CSMP ‘Graduates'.CEMREL, St. Louis, MO.
Kennewell, S. (1997) The integration of Information Technology into teachers’ decision making, in D. Passey and B. Samways (eds.) Information Technology: Supporting Change Through Teacher Education. Chapman & Hall, London.
Marshall, G. (in progress) Singing new songs: Children learning from technology.
Marshall, G. (1995) The ABC's of today's technology decision making in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. A paper presented at the Sixth IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education, Birmingham, UK, July 23–28, 1995.
Marshall, G. (1994) Cautionary verses: Prospects and problems in achieving the aims of the computer revolution, in J. Wright and D. Benzie, (eds.) Exploring a New Partnership: Children, Teachers and Technology, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
Marshall, G. (1993) Informatics and changes in learning: The American dilemma and opposing epistemological perspectives and unanswered questions, in D.C. Johnson and B. Samways (eds.) Informatics and Changes in Learning, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
Marshall, G. (1981) School Achievement Test Contributors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Murphy, P. and Moon, B. (1989) Developments in Learning and Assessment. Hodder & Stoughton, London.
Newell, A. and Simon, H. (1972) Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Nicholson, P. (1995) Constructivist approaches to tackling economic anthropomorphism in Australian IT education. A paper presented at the Sixth IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education, Birmingham, UK, July 23-28, 1995.
Roblyer, M.D., Castine, W.H. & King, F.J. (1988) Assessing the impact of computer-based instruction. Computers in Schools, 5 (3–4).
Rosch, E. (1973) On the internal structure and perceptual and semantic categories, in T.E. Mooze (ed.) Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. Academic Press, New York.
Rosvik, S. (1998) Information Technology in Norwegian education: Consistency of strategic initiatives implementing IT in primary education, in G. Marshall and M. Ruohonen (eds.) Capacity Building for IT in Education in Developing Countries. Chapman & Hall, London.
Smith, T. (1991) A Sampler of Mathematics Assessment. California State Department of Education, Sacramento, CA.
Spearman, C. (1923) The Nature of Intelligence and Principles of Cognition. Macmillan, London.
Stallings, J. (1975) Implementation and Child Effects of Teaching Practices in Follow Through Classrooms, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40/7,8, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Stenmark, J. (1989) Assessment Alternatives in Mathematics: An Overview of Assessment Techniques That Promote Learning. Regents, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
van Weert, T. (1998) Informatics for secondary education: The UNESCO/IFIP Curriculum as a resource for developed and developing countries, in G. Marshall and M. Ruohonen (eds.) Capacity Building for IT in Education in Developing Countries. Chapman & Hall, London.
Visscher, A.J. (1998) Building capacity for Information Technology in educational management in developing countries, in G. Marshall and M. Ruohonen (eds.) Capacity Building for IT in Education in Developing Countries. Chapman & Hall, London.
Watson, D. (1998) Blame the technocentric artefact! What research tells us about problems inhibiting teacher use of IT, in G. Marshall and M. Ruohonen (eds.) Capacity Building for IT in Education in Developing Countries.Chapman & Hall, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marshall, G. Exploring Assessment. Education and Information Technologies 4, 311–327 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009696327264
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009696327264